GNU bug report logs - #35312
core-update: Handle jar-files with patches

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix-patches; Reported by: Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling@HIDDEN>; dated Thu, 18 Apr 2019 05:07:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix-patches is guix-patches@HIDDEN.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2019 14:17:33 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 27 10:17:33 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39163 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hgVDQ-0002BP-P4
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:17:32 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43744)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <swedebugia@HIDDEN>) id 1hgVDO-0002BH-P1
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:17:31 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45748)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <swedebugia@HIDDEN>) id 1hgVDL-0003BP-P1
 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:17:30 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <swedebugia@HIDDEN>) id 1hgVDH-0002LI-SA
 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:17:26 -0400
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:44278)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <swedebugia@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hgVDD-0001jc-8s
 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:17:21 -0400
Received: from capuchin.riseup.net (capuchin-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.176])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489291B9350
 for <guix-patches@HIDDEN>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1561644953; bh=JpSwoTtDWgFUlboaHqCHdpQlOaJ76LKqdrX5qTNrM04=;
 h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=T548vnLHXaOWIHYcIajUFc7wxogWBQpUEBJXksLp27EqgrkqSs7Ex8wHbLskZqRXU
 mMbg6Nhd01ZvRerlpDpk+vjRFecz55J9G0uBS6mof5zYDg+GpxuSNlzQ+vMC50AZPI
 OXlFPDuQ2+HgSguXUvvWh+FWX0d12X1d3dQ0jpgM=
X-Riseup-User-ID: EC2B49B7F91BFC31B18F4DBE5A73D2C5DF6675F49CB1E6F50B643774CC7AC26D
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by capuchin.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 800B41203F2
 for <guix-patches@HIDDEN>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [bug#35312] core-update: Handle jar-files with patches
To: guix-patches@HIDDEN
References: <20190418070621.09cd7307@alma-ubu>
From: swedebugia <swedebugia@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <30fb000b-35d1-f7ab-f5f5-ceb9bc8a4ab9@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:15:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190418070621.09cd7307@alma-ubu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 198.252.153.129
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

On 2019-04-18 07:06, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote:
> Please review carefully, this is my first work below the gexp-border.
>=20
> This patch is the outcome of my question at:
>=20
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-04/msg00226.html
>=20
> When a jar-file had patches, it was not recognized and wrongly handled
> with "tar xz".
>=20
> There is one open question: For patch-and-repack, the flags defaults
> to '("p1"), but for jar-files we would usually need a "p0". That would
> mean for jar-sources with patches, one would need to manually add the
> patch-flags with "p0" to the origin. This is not nice. On the other
> hand, I would not like to override the patch-flags for jar-files to
> always "p0".
>=20
> WDYT?
>=20
> Bj=C3=B6rn
>=20
This seem to have fallen through the cracks. Can someone with gexp=20
knowledge review this?

--=20
Cheers Swedebugia




Information forwarded to guix-patches@HIDDEN:
bug#35312; Package guix-patches. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Apr 2019 05:06:40 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 18 01:06:39 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41369 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hGzFv-0007ew-Hg
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 01:06:39 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53800)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <bjoern.hoefling@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hGzFs-0007eg-Lz
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 01:06:37 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60993)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bjoern.hoefling@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hGzFn-000259-Hj
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 01:06:31 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39948)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <bjoern.hoefling@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hGzFm-0000vG-26
 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 01:06:31 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64, 
 URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <bjoern.hoefling@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hGzFk-00024H-NF
 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 01:06:30 -0400
Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:35006 helo=bjoernhoefling.de)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <bjoern.hoefling@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hGzFk-000222-3Y
 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 01:06:28 -0400
Received: from alma-ubu (unknown [37.49.7.47])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 073513F943
 for <guix-patches@HIDDEN>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 07:06:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 07:06:21 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= <bjoern.hoefling@HIDDEN>
To: <guix-patches@HIDDEN>
Subject: core-update: Handle jar-files with patches
Message-ID: <20190418070621.09cd7307@alma-ubu>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 boundary="Sig_/EQ+KlU/5e8NC4dsCpY6owft"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 83.151.27.109
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---)

--Sig_/EQ+KlU/5e8NC4dsCpY6owft
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MP_/O_BdbNh.VyB3WSzQcACN=uk"

--MP_/O_BdbNh.VyB3WSzQcACN=uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Please review carefully, this is my first work below the gexp-border.

This patch is the outcome of my question at:

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-04/msg00226.html

When a jar-file had patches, it was not recognized and wrongly handled
with "tar xz".

There is one open question: For patch-and-repack, the flags defaults
to '("p1"), but for jar-files we would usually need a "p0". That would
mean for jar-sources with patches, one would need to manually add the
patch-flags with "p0" to the origin. This is not nice. On the other
hand, I would not like to override the patch-flags for jar-files to
always "p0".

WDYT?

Bj=C3=B6rn

--MP_/O_BdbNh.VyB3WSzQcACN=uk
Content-Type: text/x-patch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename=0001-guix-Handle-patching-of-jar-files-correctly.patch

=46rom 84098800908c732facea1196cbc51b06128ff2ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =3D?UTF-8?q?Bj=3DC3=3DB6rn=3D20H=3DC3=3DB6fling?=3D
 <bjoern.hoefling@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:27:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] guix: Handle patching of jar-files correctly.

When jar-files are used as origins with patches, they were not
handled correctly and unpacked with the default "tar xz" command.
This fix adds a case for jar-files.

* guix/packages.scm (%standard-inputs): Add entry for jar-files.
(patch-and-repack)(decompression-type): Handle "jar" suffix.
patch-and-repack)(build): Unpack jar-files with unzip.
Don't change into first-file for jar-files.

See discussion at:
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-04/msg00226.html>.
---
 guix/packages.scm | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/guix/packages.scm b/guix/packages.scm
index a961dc3973..5af2c25cd9 100644
--- a/guix/packages.scm
+++ b/guix/packages.scm
@@ -436,6 +436,7 @@ identifiers.  The result is inferred from the file name=
s of patches."
       ("gzip"  ,(ref '(gnu packages compression) 'gzip))
       ("lzip"  ,(ref '(gnu packages compression) 'lzip))
       ("unzip" ,(ref '(gnu packages compression) 'unzip))
+      ("jar" ,(ref '(gnu packages compression) 'unzip))
       ("patch" ,(ref '(gnu packages base) 'patch))
       ("locales" ,(ref '(gnu packages base) 'glibc-utf8-locales)))))
=20
@@ -492,6 +493,7 @@ specifies modules in scope when evaluating SNIPPET."
           ((string-suffix? "bz2" source-file-name) "bzip2")
           ((string-suffix? "lz" source-file-name)  "lzip")
           ((string-suffix? "zip" source-file-name) "unzip")
+          ((string-suffix? "jar" source-file-name) "jar")
           (else "xz")))
=20
   (define original-file-name
@@ -585,12 +587,17 @@ specifies modules in scope when evaluating SNIPPET."
                        (directory (string-drop base (+ 1 dash))))
                   (mkdir directory)
                   (copy-recursively #+source directory))
-                #+(if (string=3D? decompression-type "unzip")
+                #+(if (or
+                       (string=3D? decompression-type "unzip")
+                       (string=3D? decompression-type "jar"))
                       #~(invoke "unzip" #+source)
                       #~(invoke (string-append #+tar "/bin/tar")
                                 "xvf" #+source)))
=20
-            (let ((directory (first-file ".")))
+            ;; jar-files have their contents directly in the root folder
+            (let ((directory (if (string=3D? #+decompression-type "jar")
+                                 "."
+                                 (first-file "."))))
               (format (current-error-port)
                       "source is under '~a'~%" directory)
               (chdir directory)
--=20
2.21.0


--MP_/O_BdbNh.VyB3WSzQcACN=uk--

--Sig_/EQ+KlU/5e8NC4dsCpY6owft
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EARECAB0WIQQiGUP0np8nb5SZM4K/KGy2WT5f/QUCXLgFzQAKCRC/KGy2WT5f
/TGRAJ45ly76SM+G8g+Aeh3WpBYojjRIOwCfdPG6lYuvdTiysK5fMqMWYIzsnIs=
=6EI4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/EQ+KlU/5e8NC4dsCpY6owft--




Acknowledgement sent to Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to guix-patches@HIDDEN:
bug#35312; Package guix-patches. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.