GNU bug report logs - #35342
configure.ac: scan also libtinfow for tputs()

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov <at> aegee.org>

Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 13:32:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed

Merged with 33977

Found in version 26.2

Fixed in versions 26.3, 27.1

Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 35342 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 35342 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#35342; Package emacs. (Sat, 20 Apr 2019 13:32:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov <at> aegee.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 20 Apr 2019 13:32:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Дилян Палаузов
 <dilyan.palauzov <at> aegee.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: configure.ac: scan also libtinfow for tputs()
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:20:38 +0000
Hello,

on my system I have no libtinfo, libncruses, libcurses, libterminfo and libtermcap.

But I have libtinfow and libncursesw, and the former contains tputs.

• Tweak ./configure.ac to scan also libtinfow and libncursesw for tputs() before giving up.

With emacs 26.2 this is not the case.

Regards
  Дилян





Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#35342; Package emacs. (Sat, 20 Apr 2019 13:45:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
To: Дилян Палаузов
 <dilyan.palauzov <at> aegee.org>
Cc: 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#35342: configure.ac: scan also libtinfow for tputs()
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 09:44:33 -0400
found 35342 26.2
fixed 35342 27.1
quit

Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov <at> aegee.org> writes:

> on my system I have no libtinfo, libncruses, libcurses, libterminfo and libtermcap.
>
> But I have libtinfow and libncursesw, and the former contains tputs.

> With emacs 26.2 this is not the case.

Yes, when you reported it previously (Bug#33977), it was only fixed on
the master branch (what will become Emacs 27.1).  Should we backport [1:
a3d52b3057] to emacs-26 (so it will be fixed in Emacs 26.3)?

[1: a3d52b3057]: 2019-01-05 10:15:56 -0800
  Port to platforms where tputs is in libtinfow
  https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=a3d52b3057c98bce581bc94912ef3ced6fad6f14




bug Marked as found in versions 26.2. Request was from Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 20 Apr 2019 13:45:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug Marked as fixed in versions 27.1. Request was from Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 20 Apr 2019 13:45:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#35342; Package emacs. (Sat, 20 Apr 2019 14:17:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: dilyan.palauzov <at> aegee.org, 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#35342: configure.ac: scan also libtinfow for tputs()
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 17:16:28 +0300
> From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 09:44:33 -0400
> Cc: 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > on my system I have no libtinfo, libncruses, libcurses, libterminfo and libtermcap.
> >
> > But I have libtinfow and libncursesw, and the former contains tputs.
> 
> > With emacs 26.2 this is not the case.
> 
> Yes, when you reported it previously (Bug#33977), it was only fixed on
> the master branch (what will become Emacs 27.1).  Should we backport [1:
> a3d52b3057] to emacs-26 (so it will be fixed in Emacs 26.3)?

OK, I guess, although I don't really understand whether tputs in
ncursesw is a drop-in replacement for its namesake in ncurses: we
don't use wide characters with the curses APIs, AFAIK.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#35342; Package emacs. (Sat, 20 Apr 2019 14:52:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #18 received at 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Дилян Палаузов
 <dilyan.palauzov <at> aegee.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#35342: configure.ac: scan also libtinfow for tputs()
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 14:51:43 +0000
Hello,

I altered my ./configure to check tinfow/ncursesw, it uses tputs from tinfow and I have not experienced any problems.

I have forgotten, that I have reported that previously.

Regards
  Дилян

On Sat, 2019-04-20 at 17:16 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 09:44:33 -0400
> > Cc: 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > 
> > > on my system I have no libtinfo, libncruses, libcurses, libterminfo and libtermcap.
> > > 
> > > But I have libtinfow and libncursesw, and the former contains tputs.
> > > With emacs 26.2 this is not the case.
> > 
> > Yes, when you reported it previously (Bug#33977), it was only fixed on
> > the master branch (what will become Emacs 27.1).  Should we backport [1:
> > a3d52b3057] to emacs-26 (so it will be fixed in Emacs 26.3)?
> 
> OK, I guess, although I don't really understand whether tputs in
> ncursesw is a drop-in replacement for its namesake in ncurses: we
> don't use wide characters with the curses APIs, AFAIK.





Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#35342; Package emacs. (Sat, 20 Apr 2019 15:33:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #21 received at 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Дилян Палаузов
 <dilyan.palauzov <at> aegee.org>
Cc: npostavs <at> gmail.com, 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#35342: configure.ac: scan also libtinfow for tputs()
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 18:31:44 +0300
> From: Дилян Палаузов
> 	 <dilyan.palauzov <at> aegee.org>
> Cc: 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 14:51:43 +0000
> 
> I altered my ./configure to check tinfow/ncursesw, it uses tputs from tinfow and I have not experienced any problems.

I understand, but the general question still stands.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#35342; Package emacs. (Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:30:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #24 received at 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: dilyan.palauzov <at> aegee.org, 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#35342: configure.ac: scan also libtinfow for tputs()
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:29:09 -0400
tags 35342 fixed
close 35342 26.3
unarchive 33977
merge 35342 33977
quit

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> Yes, when you reported it previously (Bug#33977), it was only fixed on
>> the master branch (what will become Emacs 27.1).  Should we backport [1:
>> a3d52b3057] to emacs-26 (so it will be fixed in Emacs 26.3)?
>
> OK, I guess, although I don't really understand whether tputs in
> ncursesw is a drop-in replacement for its namesake in ncurses: we
> don't use wide characters with the curses APIs, AFAIK.

Pushed to emacs-26.  No clue about the ncursesw vs ncurses though.

531c74e249 2019-04-27T13:17:10-04:00 "Port to platforms where tputs is in libtinfow"
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=531c74e2493cf54dc76238930bb93c6d7112ed3b





Added tag(s) fixed. Request was from Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:30:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug marked as fixed in version 26.3, send any further explanations to 35342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov <at> aegee.org> Request was from Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:30:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Merged 33977 35342. Request was from Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:30:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 26 May 2019 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 335 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.