GNU bug report logs - #35529
libdrm fails to build on armhf-linux

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>; dated Wed, 1 May 2019 21:44:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 35529) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2019 12:47:37 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 07 08:47:37 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58333 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hNzVR-0002NO-7O
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 08:47:37 -0400
Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21352)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rekado@HIDDEN>) id 1hNzVN-0002NC-CU
 for 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 08:47:35 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557162017; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; 
 b=MHVy3bVBWg39IAD6o3bQ/ZFfk89964jykI399PbQw8bcP3K/iiclbG8uy1gMflQfuI7OZb9KGfcJENI2BrtipH/4+4/0dAf5PHDgeF/B0R9UU9xTCv192MtzpcZ2kEhM/WsKOKOSGKsNbFytRMowSX1AS/L9Ol92Ni47XuaMB0E=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com;
 s=zohoarc; t=1557162017;
 h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results;
 bh=ioAgG1gw2GWTuJUAlOq5UL1EpS7ctzsdwkIFQJ+KhdQ=; 
 b=bWeDtL0EU93ioXrsvEtNAsJpD97k0txMiRr+iN4FHa0rsc3iTUZP5frw3syfmC4gTHPgXtehrVeW5umZFtCFceZYELLVjzINjm6JZ0JVOoezvf7Jv8RaAj2TO1FXK567ynl+tLZV8ZExt+HNS2iucBF2ewJyqhe4nk0fwtjH7QM=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass  header.i=elephly.net;
 spf=pass  smtp.mailfrom=rekado@HIDDEN;
 dmarc=pass header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN> header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1557162017; 
 s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@HIDDEN;
 h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
 l=2024; bh=ioAgG1gw2GWTuJUAlOq5UL1EpS7ctzsdwkIFQJ+KhdQ=;
 b=SVQVv1lLuJ8VBWrx9iDK4BlQYJ+KYA1nIdb1Vv84RFd/ENAjHS/E4RILUJH4ORc2
 FuB8Fp5EG0ldtV5gHyqCJKAqHgfSTkN2GQpeasBVsm0mK5BSDLxTB3cttNl3LcrbEQA
 bEVtYBCGFJja/e8Q3eT+tWfdnM2mjYCeNgg9yKfA=
Received: from localhost (p54AD4E59.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.78.89]) by
 mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 155716201691277.6813843785701;
 Mon, 6 May 2019 10:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
References: <87d0l1n97o.fsf@HIDDEN> <87k1f8gl7k.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87imuosew7.fsf@HIDDEN> <874l68qcio.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <8736lsq9ec.fsf@HIDDEN> <8736lrrget.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87a7fz7cyq.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.2
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#35529: libdrm fails to build on armhf-linux
In-reply-to: <87a7fz7cyq.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-URL: https://elephly.net
X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey
X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 19:00:12 +0200
Message-ID: <87a7fzfrhf.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-ZohoMailClient: External
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35529
Cc: 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)


Hi Mark,

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>>>>>> This has built fine on berlin.  We have a completed build for
>>>>>> /gnu/store/3c28p8b07709isd9jlcnnnyrpgz4ndz8-libdrm-2.4.97.
>>>>>
>>>>> What kind of hardware was it built on?
>>>>
>>>> I=E2=80=99m not sure.  We=E2=80=99re using a few Overdrive 1000 machin=
es that have quite
>>>> a bit more RAM than the other armhf nodes.
>>>
>>> Are there any other kinds of build slaves that build armhf binaries for
>>> Berlin?
>>
>> Yes.  We have a Beagleboard (x15.sjd.se), which is set up for 2 parallel
>> builds and we use the Qemu service on 5 of our x86_64 machines to build
>> for armhf.  (We do the same for aarch64, but using 5 different nodes.)
>
> So, many of the armhf builds are done in an emulator.

Since maybe a week or so.  I only added the qemu machines very recently.

> I hope that we will soon phase out the practice of performing builds
> within emulators.

I did this because the extra Overdrive boxen I bought still haven=E2=80=99t=
 been
added to the build farm.  To better deal with the build backlog I added
the Qemu machines.  I also hope that we can soon use dedicated build
machines instead.

> In the meantime, it would be good to know which machine built 'libdrm'
> for armhf.  Was that information recorded?

I don=E2=80=99t know where I would find that information.

>> =E2=80=9Cnss=E2=80=9D failed its tests when built on x15.sjd.se, but it =
worked fine when
>> building on one of the Overdrives.
>
> Can you find the failed NSS build log from the X15?  It would useful to
> see which tests failed, and whether they're the same ones that failed on
> hydra-slave3, which is a Novena with 4 GB of RAM.  Here's the relevant
> Hydra build page: <https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3484222>.

I didn=E2=80=99t keep track of the log.  I built this manually on berlin to=
 test
a workaround (which failed).  The build log probably still sits on
berlin somewhere, but I cannot find it.

--=20
Ricardo





Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#35529; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 35529) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 16:42:27 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 12:42:27 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hNgh9-0003fv-2a
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 12:42:27 -0400
Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:36156)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1hNgh7-0003fd-Th
 for 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 12:42:26 -0400
Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hNgh1-0004uZ-B9; Mon, 06 May 2019 12:42:19 -0400
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#35529: libdrm fails to build on armhf-linux
References: <87d0l1n97o.fsf@HIDDEN> <87k1f8gl7k.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87imuosew7.fsf@HIDDEN> <874l68qcio.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <8736lsq9ec.fsf@HIDDEN> <8736lrrget.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 12:40:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8736lrrget.fsf@HIDDEN> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Mon,
 06 May 2019 13:06:18 +0200")
Message-ID: <87a7fz7cyq.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35529
Cc: 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi Ricardo,

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> writes:

>>>>> This has built fine on berlin.  We have a completed build for
>>>>> /gnu/store/3c28p8b07709isd9jlcnnnyrpgz4ndz8-libdrm-2.4.97.
>>>>
>>>> What kind of hardware was it built on?
>>>
>>> I=E2=80=99m not sure.  We=E2=80=99re using a few Overdrive 1000 machine=
s that have quite
>>> a bit more RAM than the other armhf nodes.
>>
>> Are there any other kinds of build slaves that build armhf binaries for
>> Berlin?
>
> Yes.  We have a Beagleboard (x15.sjd.se), which is set up for 2 parallel
> builds and we use the Qemu service on 5 of our x86_64 machines to build
> for armhf.  (We do the same for aarch64, but using 5 different nodes.)

So, many of the armhf builds are done in an emulator.  This is exactly
what I was curious about.  One problem with doing this is that tests
performed during these builds do not necessarily reflect what will
happen on real armhf hardware.

I'll give just one example of where this approach will fail badly: tests
of thread synchronization.  The memory models used in ARM and x86_64 are
quite different, and an ARM emulator running on x86_64 will effectively
have a much stronger memory model than real ARM hardware does.

It's much harder to perform safe thread synchronization on ARM than on
x86_64.  Many programmers use idioms that they believe are safe, and
which work on x86_64, but are buggy on many architectures with weaker
memory models.  Those are the kinds of bugs that will *not* be
discovered by test suites when we perform the builds under QEMU.

I hope that we will soon phase out the practice of performing builds
within emulators.

In the meantime, it would be good to know which machine built 'libdrm'
for armhf.  Was that information recorded?

> =E2=80=9Cnss=E2=80=9D failed its tests when built on x15.sjd.se, but it w=
orked fine when
> building on one of the Overdrives.

Can you find the failed NSS build log from the X15?  It would useful to
see which tests failed, and whether they're the same ones that failed on
hydra-slave3, which is a Novena with 4 GB of RAM.  Here's the relevant
Hydra build page: <https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3484222>.

       Thanks!
         Mark




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#35529; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 35529) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 14:52:16 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 10:52:16 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57189 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hNeyW-0000Ya-3C
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:52:16 -0400
Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21389)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rekado@HIDDEN>) id 1hNeyU-0000YS-GM
 for 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:52:15 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557140784; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; 
 b=l2ZVkWG1IOEPNQAd1OIPRbHd4/dK8WtkATUC7ib1hZ86uMs9DctAlKO1c8ORbL9CYYCwjiD0C82Qfd5ftFB+R0WW7SXHfFmr9nATBGZkUYQNI1sA5MXo5RrdA7NY8qv93uU5ly6m8VIpRrASwjjGbbT4q99be4uodzoZ/ehYEVc=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com;
 s=zohoarc; t=1557140784;
 h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results;
 bh=bxgR3Boe0BNjXyPWSn/0qRrxaw9Vgxufwfu7VeehyVI=; 
 b=PXwZd5nCtGzomZ9F0kgUDcd8/h7L/lPLk1dOvgYL6KWS7SsRyTEaUVxfQ6QmUosVoN5Hf9sXY1Up/C2tdnM3J3D9LwwmCvRZbzQ3ldKl18mwwBA2yAHHKrxJHP1q3THrG+qqBwDEL44yXX5quM26+FnckF3Hq28pShLo3ow3/UY=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass  header.i=elephly.net;
 spf=pass  smtp.mailfrom=rekado@HIDDEN;
 dmarc=pass header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN> header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1557140784; 
 s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@HIDDEN;
 h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
 l=1257; bh=bxgR3Boe0BNjXyPWSn/0qRrxaw9Vgxufwfu7VeehyVI=;
 b=hprmtwBGFEM6DyB0DMym7SX/rpejuUf9J6ZCmfUs8TR538eGWDpQDuZhprm7y+UP
 rPxwfqmx+Lq3om3/TpStnnh6srOYF3sWAkgFK2jGnXjYYOqXKRwLhbISU7GIbAObaa9
 38pYElR442JfSfCxZjevT398cXWE8JbNS2lgSuFw=
Received: from localhost (141.80.245.207 [141.80.245.207]) by mx.zohomail.com
 with SMTPS id 1557140782907503.6788196588468;
 Mon, 6 May 2019 04:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
References: <87d0l1n97o.fsf@HIDDEN> <87k1f8gl7k.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87imuosew7.fsf@HIDDEN> <874l68qcio.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <8736lsq9ec.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.2
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#35529: libdrm fails to build on armhf-linux
In-reply-to: <8736lsq9ec.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-URL: https://elephly.net
X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey
X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 13:06:18 +0200
Message-ID: <8736lrrget.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-ZohoMailClient: External
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35529
Cc: 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)


Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> writes:
>>>
>>>> Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Hydra failed two consecutive attempts to build libdrm on armhf-linux:
>>>>>
>>>>>   https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3481547#tabs-summary
>>>>>
>>>>> Both build attempts were made on hydra-slave2, which is a Wandboard Q=
uad
>>>>> based on the Freescale i.MX6 SOC.
>>>>
>>>> This has built fine on berlin.  We have a completed build for
>>>> /gnu/store/3c28p8b07709isd9jlcnnnyrpgz4ndz8-libdrm-2.4.97.
>>>
>>> What kind of hardware was it built on?
>>
>> I=E2=80=99m not sure.  We=E2=80=99re using a few Overdrive 1000 machines=
 that have quite
>> a bit more RAM than the other armhf nodes.
>
> Are there any other kinds of build slaves that build armhf binaries for
> Berlin?

Yes.  We have a Beagleboard (x15.sjd.se), which is set up for 2 parallel
builds and we use the Qemu service on 5 of our x86_64 machines to build
for armhf.  (We do the same for aarch64, but using 5 different nodes.)

=E2=80=9Cnss=E2=80=9D failed its tests when built on x15.sjd.se, but it wor=
ked fine when
building on one of the Overdrives.

--
Ricardo





Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#35529; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 35529) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 08:24:38 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 04:24:38 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55648 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hNYvO-0004hS-Ax
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 04:24:38 -0400
Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:35004)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1hNYvN-0004hB-0u
 for 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 04:24:37 -0400
Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hNYvG-0000I8-VW; Mon, 06 May 2019 04:24:31 -0400
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#35529: libdrm fails to build on armhf-linux
References: <87d0l1n97o.fsf@HIDDEN> <87k1f8gl7k.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87imuosew7.fsf@HIDDEN> <874l68qcio.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 04:22:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <874l68qcio.fsf@HIDDEN> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Mon,
 06 May 2019 09:15:43 +0200")
Message-ID: <8736lsq9ec.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35529
Cc: 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi Ricardo,

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> writes:

>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> writes:
>>
>>> Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hydra failed two consecutive attempts to build libdrm on armhf-linux:
>>>>
>>>>   https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3481547#tabs-summary
>>>>
>>>> Both build attempts were made on hydra-slave2, which is a Wandboard Qu=
ad
>>>> based on the Freescale i.MX6 SOC.
>>>
>>> This has built fine on berlin.  We have a completed build for
>>> /gnu/store/3c28p8b07709isd9jlcnnnyrpgz4ndz8-libdrm-2.4.97.
>>
>> What kind of hardware was it built on?
>
> I=E2=80=99m not sure.  We=E2=80=99re using a few Overdrive 1000 machines =
that have quite
> a bit more RAM than the other armhf nodes.

Are there any other kinds of build slaves that build armhf binaries for
Berlin?

>> Note that the failure on Hydra was due to a timeout in the test suite:
>>
>>   https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3481547/nixlog/6/tail-reload
>>
>> All of the other tests completed within a few seconds, but the timeout
>> tripped after 1200 seconds.  So, I'm not sure if it's simply that the
>> build hardware is too slow.  It might have actually gotten stuck.
>> Perhaps the test uses /dev/random (as opposed to /dev/urandom) and
>> there's not enough entropy available on the build machine.
>
> My guess is that it ran out of RAM and began trashing.  We=E2=80=99ve had=
 at
> least another build (nss) that worked fine on the Overdrive but failed
> on other armhf machines.

All of the armhf build slaves on hydra.gnu.org have 4 gigabytes of RAM.
So does redhill, the armhf slave hosted by Andreas.

My Thinkpad X200 only has 4 gigabytes, and that's enough to build my
entire GNOME system from source code, including webkitgtk, icecat, rust,
nss, etc.

FWIW, I'd be very surprised if these libdrm test failures are due to
running out of memory.

       Mark




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#35529; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 35529) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 07:16:11 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 03:16:11 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55611 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hNXr8-00030K-Ld
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 03:16:10 -0400
Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21277)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rekado@HIDDEN>) id 1hNXr6-00030B-TF
 for 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 03:16:09 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557126950; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; 
 b=GijhxgZf32vDrzViPiVmMP5huYFOyY7/qSXD35rsXoBl2zq338QflYIP0wg1p18jYFd0CArmO/96Z96H82A27qSOj4g2MKpNRjMm8WKUBSEtF/UucjxLsI+M6dFG2rtpetQCrzS+3vWnaZtlDd1naDzIzsMHfxAhDdy4MCj+eGQ=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com;
 s=zohoarc; t=1557126950;
 h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results;
 bh=1/PeECAJjVcpr8hO9Hs6IPzwfEHbW1/haWVp3ArRVZw=; 
 b=NYvokxRQLepNkwS8cp3E2Vzrd7LLgGVJrngjtv+PF4gzaT6+y/GvrlFnWSK6AAUl1/pjsqJsmewHj31b00qKFemQuKHmJ7Dka+CLXOzhPmioRt9rMbe3bp9E/OrJAY+MtHBGfVDPcjr79wjJp30RYV2pfZDGsRktiPrbS+bLeYI=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass  header.i=elephly.net;
 spf=pass  smtp.mailfrom=rekado@HIDDEN;
 dmarc=pass header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN> header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1557126950; 
 s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@HIDDEN;
 h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
 l=1365; bh=1/PeECAJjVcpr8hO9Hs6IPzwfEHbW1/haWVp3ArRVZw=;
 b=ZEL+g/Qk/I6vKns95gG8x5OxP1gHIcXEuVRl8wCUDezdnwk5tAQVPbiruyC877eI
 sYS1rc0oos3VDeldJGWAeGi4dN/3UCq2ZXv6Hvw00w9DxzgY/MTgsA2/Zh7vTYC3ixQ
 zYn2FrU4zy3rV+/2pwXUtndzqUkEurXtg7hsq80E=
Received: from localhost (p54AD4E59.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.78.89]) by
 mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1557126947232578.2099507387388;
 Mon, 6 May 2019 00:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
References: <87d0l1n97o.fsf@HIDDEN> <87k1f8gl7k.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87imuosew7.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.2
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#35529: libdrm fails to build on armhf-linux
In-reply-to: <87imuosew7.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-URL: https://elephly.net
X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey
X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 09:15:43 +0200
Message-ID: <874l68qcio.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-ZohoMailClient: External
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35529
Cc: 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)


Hi Mark,

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> writes:
>>
>>> Hydra failed two consecutive attempts to build libdrm on armhf-linux:
>>>
>>>   https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3481547#tabs-summary
>>>
>>> Both build attempts were made on hydra-slave2, which is a Wandboard Quad
>>> based on the Freescale i.MX6 SOC.
>>
>> This has built fine on berlin.  We have a completed build for
>> /gnu/store/3c28p8b07709isd9jlcnnnyrpgz4ndz8-libdrm-2.4.97.
>
> What kind of hardware was it built on?

I=E2=80=99m not sure.  We=E2=80=99re using a few Overdrive 1000 machines th=
at have quite
a bit more RAM than the other armhf nodes.

> Note that the failure on Hydra was due to a timeout in the test suite:
>
>   https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3481547/nixlog/6/tail-reload
>
> All of the other tests completed within a few seconds, but the timeout
> tripped after 1200 seconds.  So, I'm not sure if it's simply that the
> build hardware is too slow.  It might have actually gotten stuck.
> Perhaps the test uses /dev/random (as opposed to /dev/urandom) and
> there's not enough entropy available on the build machine.

My guess is that it ran out of RAM and began trashing.  We=E2=80=99ve had at
least another build (nss) that worked fine on the Overdrive but failed
on other armhf machines.

--=20
Ricardo





Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#35529; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 35529) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2019 22:42:57 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 18:42:57 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55149 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hNPqT-0000DM-9Z
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 18:42:57 -0400
Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:33666)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1hNPqR-0000D9-Nj
 for 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 18:42:56 -0400
Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hNPqM-0003Ur-24; Sun, 05 May 2019 18:42:50 -0400
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#35529: libdrm fails to build on armhf-linux
References: <87d0l1n97o.fsf@HIDDEN> <87k1f8gl7k.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 18:41:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87k1f8gl7k.fsf@HIDDEN> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Fri,
 03 May 2019 07:29:03 +0200")
Message-ID: <87imuosew7.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35529
Cc: 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi Ricardo,

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> writes:

> Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> Hydra failed two consecutive attempts to build libdrm on armhf-linux:
>>
>>   https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3481547#tabs-summary
>>
>> Both build attempts were made on hydra-slave2, which is a Wandboard Quad
>> based on the Freescale i.MX6 SOC.
>
> This has built fine on berlin.  We have a completed build for
> /gnu/store/3c28p8b07709isd9jlcnnnyrpgz4ndz8-libdrm-2.4.97.

What kind of hardware was it built on?

Note that the failure on Hydra was due to a timeout in the test suite:

  https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3481547/nixlog/6/tail-reload

All of the other tests completed within a few seconds, but the timeout
tripped after 1200 seconds.  So, I'm not sure if it's simply that the
build hardware is too slow.  It might have actually gotten stuck.
Perhaps the test uses /dev/random (as opposed to /dev/urandom) and
there's not enough entropy available on the build machine.

      Thanks,
        Mark




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#35529; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 35529) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2019 17:42:37 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 13:42:36 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54791 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hNL9o-0004Sl-Kw
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 13:42:36 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:57060)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1hNL9m-0004Sb-KC
 for 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 13:42:35 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6874F891;
 Sun,  5 May 2019 19:42:30 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id prVV6JFwH1c2; Sun,  5 May 2019 19:42:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jurong (unknown [80.214.122.228])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AC88F88B;
 Sun,  5 May 2019 19:42:29 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 19:42:26 +0200
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#35529: libdrm fails to build on armhf-linux
Message-ID: <20190505174226.GA2205@jurong>
References: <87d0l1n97o.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87k1f8gl7k.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87k1f8gl7k.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35529
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>, 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/)

On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 07:29:03AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > Both build attempts were made on hydra-slave2, which is a Wandboard Quad
> > based on the Freescale i.MX6 SOC.
> This has built fine on berlin.  We have a completed build for
> /gnu/store/3c28p8b07709isd9jlcnnnyrpgz4ndz8-libdrm-2.4.97.

And I confirm it fails to build on redhill (a Novena machine) as well
(I have tried it only once, though).

Andreas





Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#35529; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 35529) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2019 05:17:39 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 01:17:39 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52868 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hN9Wt-0004M3-06
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 01:17:39 -0400
Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21300)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rekado@HIDDEN>) id 1hN9Wq-0004Lt-K2
 for 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 01:17:37 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556861348; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; 
 b=hTO0D0P4PC/M5ZgnjVqpLKAsh1xwk1ajt941ivnJMAhLTEDg9NzxOi1vm7KNCEMC9nQIc0xN4u7vg3O8qqndYIRzVAwV1fCqvjEoIhS6dNnZgGukzCSmnU324ksbHTKH3o59bEyJgCy7r0+WJaoH45tfNCV5R4XkEfOFF/cCgqQ=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com;
 s=zohoarc; t=1556861348;
 h=Content-Type:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results;
 bh=3PDe9DDMGEvheT7eHtp5jq4zSt90c2kEi/tqmbQZ92A=; 
 b=iG2s0SMVki0/TQ6O1p3lTICUC6aTNkQuwpjwKk7z0OOu8BhGyLTKdRPAzHFrR/cJWc1zAxtzfbBvPdhUDvxhBr6HFyrRSvrFBcwaDLymbZraRJswf1dzb/30rQRb5gaZdcjHwSVlUTZ4P1GQGob6Y7+Wiknc1FleduTBpQYn8II=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass  header.i=elephly.net;
 spf=pass  smtp.mailfrom=rekado@HIDDEN;
 dmarc=pass header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN> header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1556861348; 
 s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@HIDDEN;
 h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
 l=427; bh=3PDe9DDMGEvheT7eHtp5jq4zSt90c2kEi/tqmbQZ92A=;
 b=C99BEYRBaG/xiHe9ud9E5codmaXIUKxRFC/djBgobQN22/XiyuBCaol0EG/nRksY
 CUU4SrMu0UbyOR5xA2D52USSkzYUqhZHx8yBmoFUPCYMIqarXJeCSm9j3FV4S510dk8
 Jnh2JXlrgeOGLR22hgk0snoS0J/jMBNtdBZqsHXM=
Received: from localhost (p54AD4EB5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.78.181]) by
 mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1556861346057407.7636702667065;
 Thu, 2 May 2019 22:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
References: <87d0l1n97o.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#35529: libdrm fails to build on armhf-linux
In-reply-to: <87d0l1n97o.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-URL: https://elephly.net
X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey
X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 07:29:03 +0200
Message-ID: <87k1f8gl7k.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-ZohoMailClient: External
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35529
Cc: 35529 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)


Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hydra failed two consecutive attempts to build libdrm on armhf-linux:
>
>   https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3481547#tabs-summary
>
> Both build attempts were made on hydra-slave2, which is a Wandboard Quad
> based on the Freescale i.MX6 SOC.

This has built fine on berlin.  We have a completed build for
/gnu/store/3c28p8b07709isd9jlcnnnyrpgz4ndz8-libdrm-2.4.97.

--
Ricardo





Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#35529; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2019 21:43:25 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 01 17:43:25 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45098 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hLx0e-00020o-Vg
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 17:43:25 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55064)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1hLx0d-00020a-GR
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 17:43:23 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34627)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1hLx0Y-0002R0-Bf
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 17:43:18 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41183)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1hLx0X-0003Rh-3S
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 01 May 2019 17:43:18 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1hLx0W-0002Ls-5S
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 01 May 2019 17:43:17 -0400
Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:54524)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1hLx0W-00022K-18
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 01 May 2019 17:43:16 -0400
Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hLx0K-00031r-3j; Wed, 01 May 2019 17:43:04 -0400
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: libdrm fails to build on armhf-linux
Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 17:41:20 -0400
Message-ID: <87d0l1n97o.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 64.112.178.59
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

Hydra failed two consecutive attempts to build libdrm on armhf-linux:

  https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3481547#tabs-summary

Both build attempts were made on hydra-slave2, which is a Wandboard Quad
based on the Freescale i.MX6 SOC.

Collateral damage includes several hundred dependency failures,
including emacs-26.

       Mark




Acknowledgement sent to Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#35529; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Tue, 7 May 2019 13:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.