GNU bug report logs - #35664
Install snippets with guix

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Amar Singh <nly <at> disroot.org>

Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 01:44:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 35664 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 35664 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#35664; Package guix. (Fri, 10 May 2019 01:44:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Amar Singh <nly <at> disroot.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 10 May 2019 01:44:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Amar Singh <nly <at> disroot.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Install snippets with guix
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 07:12:57 +0530
When Guix includes some Yasnippet snippets for Emacs in its source, why aren't these
installed with package Guix?




Reply sent to Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:59:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Amar Singh <nly <at> disroot.org>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:59:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 35664-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Amar Singh <nly <at> disroot.org>
Cc: 35664-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#35664: Install snippets with guix
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:58:50 -0500
Hi,

Amar Singh <nly <at> disroot.org> writes:

> When Guix includes some Yasnippet snippets for Emacs in its source, why aren't these
> installed with package Guix?

These are meant for hacking on Guix itself, meaning having a git
checkout of the source readily available.  They aren't typically useful
in the context of *using* Guix.  Guix the package also shouldn't be
manually installed to a profile ('guix pull' manages its special profile
for it).

Finally, a better tool has been developed, which lives in the
etc/commiter.scm script.

I'm closing the issue.

Thanks for the report!

Maxim




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:24:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 180 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.