GNU bug report logs - #35736
geiser-edit-symbol-at-point (M-.) does not work on fork+exec-command

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Package: guix-patches; Reported by: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>; dated Tue, 14 May 2019 20:31:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix-patches is guix-patches@HIDDEN.

Message received at 35736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 35736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2019 09:53:50 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 16 05:53:50 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54298 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hRD5B-0007kX-Oj
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 05:53:49 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60045)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1hRD5A-0007kG-04
 for 35736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 05:53:48 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47059)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hRD54-0003xF-1g; Thu, 16 May 2019 05:53:42 -0400
Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=40940 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hRD53-0004wH-G3; Thu, 16 May 2019 05:53:41 -0400
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#35736] geiser-edit-symbol-at-point (M-.) does not work on
 fork+exec-command
References: <cu7a7fo93vf.fsf@HIDDEN> <87y337vql5.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <cu74l5u98v7.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 27 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 11:53:40 +0200
In-Reply-To: <cu74l5u98v7.fsf@HIDDEN> (Arun Isaac's message of "Thu, 
 16 May 2019 12:36:04 +0530")
Message-ID: <87a7fmiv2z.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35736
Cc: 35736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN> skribis:

>> What about proposing this change to =E2=80=98scheme-mode=E2=80=99 to Ema=
cs upstream?
>>
>> Alternately, or in the meantime, we could carry that fix in Geiser
>> maybe?
>
> I don't think reporting this to scheme-mode or geiser would help. They
> are justified in classifying ?+ as a symbol constituent character
> (_). It is we (the Guix project) who have reclassified ?+ as an
> expression prefix character (') in a "non-standard" way for our use in
> gexps. WDYT?

Oh true, sorry!

Well I don=E2=80=99t know, I=E2=80=99m confused now.  I vaguely remember pr=
ior
discussions about this with Alex Kost, but I forgot what the conclusions
were.  :-/

Ludo=E2=80=99.
Information forwarded to guix-patches@HIDDEN:
bug#35736; Package guix-patches. Full text available.

Message received at 35736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 35736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2019 07:06:30 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 16 03:06:30 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54085 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hRATF-0003bQ-Tw
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 03:06:30 -0400
Received: from mugam.systemreboot.net ([139.59.75.54]:50678)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>) id 1hRATC-0003bA-0Z
 for 35736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 03:06:28 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=systemreboot.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:
 References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:
 Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:
 List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=KfAzdSZYvwp4LPQCxu8egtG+MWuBRcpV7pZQM+BGJZU=; b=EC3AGpNu1r1uSnxmLGLOvprrE
 uJJPrecxISjdXVketGQNDCE/vY3scficE1qQWDTL9oSYuN2z4zsSaGfUU5T4UYVCZ4rYs1OY1U1/E
 C8Qn5gkNhSIeWQPjTAlQJr0DyPRWyL6hErycQQHH607FUuFCX8IwV+/7ChnIOzXxwsAEE=;
Received: from [14.139.128.10] (helo=steel)
 by systemreboot.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hRAT8-00053E-8h; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:36:22 +0530
From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#35736] geiser-edit-symbol-at-point (M-.) does not work on
 fork+exec-command
In-Reply-To: <87y337vql5.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <cu7a7fo93vf.fsf@HIDDEN> <87y337vql5.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 12:36:04 +0530
Message-ID: <cu74l5u98v7.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35736
Cc: 35736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


> What about proposing this change to =E2=80=98scheme-mode=E2=80=99 to Emac=
s upstream?
>
> Alternately, or in the meantime, we could carry that fix in Geiser
> maybe?

I don't think reporting this to scheme-mode or geiser would help. They
are justified in classifying ?+ as a symbol constituent character
(_). It is we (the Guix project) who have reclassified ?+ as an
expression prefix character (') in a "non-standard" way for our use in
gexps. WDYT?

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEf3MDQ/Lwnzx3v3nTLiXui2GAK7MFAlzdC9wACgkQLiXui2GA
K7M9fQf+LEM/nPo7ryeMktDeg3WGbMj0gKjjJFjC7NH9mL7bOMwjXzFBjfSyYdKW
ADUPrara+HYiiyH4jDf1tuyF0UxQHq36FC/T3xH6X2E1mtxzKT/POP3yssYXDpk2
Ip8yQGslTLynze1PjbN8kgHxWJBCviBAEC2bteCWW/DU9ZD+iHdcEjxRapskVv9e
6fwlRzi0Iy7Y4LXpUMr1N/pocAeU7yeLfRH7IVAtId/tncC+jsrvqki7IZ5p7e4g
B6yxbRlN/d5tDqDprjojgd1Oncvxm08CKkDhQwpFhP6Oq7FV4RHnsfOFGalyLELJ
ILSxQqgK3CNug/GEKvOEczWndxstJw==
=oGKr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
Information forwarded to guix-patches@HIDDEN:
bug#35736; Package guix-patches. Full text available.

Message received at 35736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 35736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2019 12:40:32 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 15 08:40:32 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51435 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hQtCx-0007cr-NX
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:40:32 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48140)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1hQtCv-0007ca-HC
 for 35736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:40:30 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55435)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hQtCg-0001tD-D2; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:40:16 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=42010 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hQtCc-0001re-7Z; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:40:10 -0400
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#35736] geiser-edit-symbol-at-point (M-.) does not work on
 fork+exec-command
References: <cu7a7fo93vf.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 14:40:06 +0200
In-Reply-To: <cu7a7fo93vf.fsf@HIDDEN> (Arun Isaac's message of "Wed, 
 15 May 2019 01:59:24 +0530")
Message-ID: <87y337vql5.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35736
Cc: 35736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi,

Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN> skribis:

> geiser-edit-symbol-at-point (M-.) does not work on
> fork+exec-command. geiser wrongly tries to lookup fork instead of
> looking up fork+exec-command. This is because (thing-at-point 'symbol)
> does not correctly identify the whole symbol. And, that, in turn, is
> because ?+ has been reclassified as an expression prefix character (')
> in .dir-locals.el. It should be a symbol constituent character (_) which
> is the default for scheme mode.
>
> (modify-syntax-entry ?+ "'")

What about proposing this change to =E2=80=98scheme-mode=E2=80=99 to Emacs =
upstream?

Alternately, or in the meantime, we could carry that fix in Geiser
maybe?

Thoughts?

Ludo=E2=80=99.
Information forwarded to guix-patches@HIDDEN:
bug#35736; Package guix-patches. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2019 20:30:11 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 14 16:30:11 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49961 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hQe3v-0004Wx-F0
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 16:30:11 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48759)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>) id 1hQe3s-0004Vk-L5
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 16:30:09 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:48683)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hQe3m-0008E2-4R
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 16:30:03 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34901)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>) id 1hQe3l-00039P-6I
 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Tue, 14 May 2019 16:30:02 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,URIBL_BLOCKED
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>) id 1hQe3j-0008BA-KC
 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Tue, 14 May 2019 16:30:01 -0400
Received: from mugam.systemreboot.net ([139.59.75.54]:58794)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hQe3f-0007zb-S5; Tue, 14 May 2019 16:29:56 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=systemreboot.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:
 Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
 :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=Pnc9AIyP4kEY2kAuarjsUjRhhYfoCwk33TcnxT5oYeE=; b=Ux0M4FVl6Ix5EOGewhAWv+f1Xe
 KuxEbfmBQBOwDABJNk4LrKSd8ABEH1gY9ywWopq1yrNp6X0NQFqeZItSuzeP//QIlZfOJUbPjv/i9
 mjFtPZiQtNFRjmPhhS+gBLxt8yc1UjO0+6yeALLNR5e2EtvsZaKirewPILiwJEI3dUu8=;
Received: from [49.206.13.189] (helo=steel)
 by systemreboot.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hQe3b-0000Ov-1a; Wed, 15 May 2019 01:59:51 +0530
From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
To: guix-patches@HIDDEN
Subject: geiser-edit-symbol-at-point (M-.) does not work on fork+exec-command
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 01:59:24 +0530
Message-ID: <cu7a7fo93vf.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 139.59.75.54
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


geiser-edit-symbol-at-point (M-.) does not work on
fork+exec-command. geiser wrongly tries to lookup fork instead of
looking up fork+exec-command. This is because (thing-at-point 'symbol)
does not correctly identify the whole symbol. And, that, in turn, is
because ?+ has been reclassified as an expression prefix character (')
in .dir-locals.el. It should be a symbol constituent character (_) which
is the default for scheme mode.

(modify-syntax-entry ?+ "'")

This is a rather trivial bug. But, I thought I'll just document it
here. I'm not sure if we should fix it. I can't think of any easy way
out.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEf3MDQ/Lwnzx3v3nTLiXui2GAK7MFAlzbJSUACgkQLiXui2GA
K7Ohuwf/SVeW6Ml2ctmmCVyBiSJ7Kk6G7+ivch8NWzV+HpSkHxZ2xCqKwCvZI53p
C0hI8801fd7p/55w65C8MgKhiuQl0TboOsh3djmlGCgZ5O7WsVGB27xpurwxwDWz
l1jWDA4vW9IVGeHXDMHwVnVatYTWny7WkbznyfVOjGwK+3VHaBt6Q1piMpjsK8pi
5NFVx8T+OQI01Esc7a+iHiR67aAaPgKpHnnGsBKGj6+AXiEsOzMDU175uXDagpwF
rdAeaydM9ExNE3TpLMre8Uo8946RabbiU4OJjiprT/YYFpRBNxQwQfwcKxKNH4LO
Cnj+iXW6NKnd8TPe1gxeshb/Ay88RA==
=bn5T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
Acknowledgement sent to Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to guix-patches@HIDDEN:
bug#35736; Package guix-patches. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.