GNU bug report logs -
#35913
[core-updates] Building "doc/guix.de.texi" fails
Previous Next
Reported by: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 06:56:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 35913 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 35913 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35913
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 26 May 2019 06:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 26 May 2019 06:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello!
On the 'core-updates' branch, `make dist-info` fails like so:
$ make dist-info
MAKEINFO doc/guix.de.info
./doc/guix.de.texi:26832: @menu reference to nonexistent node `Vorbereitung, um die Bootstrap-Binrdateien zu verwenden'
./doc/guix.de.texi:26837: warning: node `Vorbereitung' is next for `Reduced Binary Seed Bootstrap' in sectioning but not in menu
./doc/guix.de.texi:26884: Next reference to nonexistent `um die Bootstrap-Binrdateien zu verwenden'
make: *** [Makefile:3929: doc/guix.de.info] Error 1
This may be the result of a bad merge in
57df83e07d4b5e78d9a54c1a88d05b4a9ed65714. But there was no conflicts in
that area, and I don't really understand the error message.
The documentation section in question only exists on the 'core-updates'
branch and was added in commit a243722c5b8d50b4f0e3f9717ca71aa43dfc56a3.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35913
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 06 Jun 2019 07:51:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 35913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> skribis:
> On the 'core-updates' branch, `make dist-info` fails like so:
>
> $ make dist-info
> MAKEINFO doc/guix.de.info
> ./doc/guix.de.texi:26832: @menu reference to nonexistent node `Vorbereitung, um die Bootstrap-Binrdateien zu verwenden'
> ./doc/guix.de.texi:26837: warning: node `Vorbereitung' is next for `Reduced Binary Seed Bootstrap' in sectioning but not in menu
> ./doc/guix.de.texi:26884: Next reference to nonexistent `um die Bootstrap-Binrdateien zu verwenden'
> make: *** [Makefile:3929: doc/guix.de.info] Error 1
I believe this has to do with the fact that, in ‘core-updates’, “Reduced
Binary Seed Bootstrap” is a new node.
Julien, any idea what’s going on?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35913
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 06 Jun 2019 08:10:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 35913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Le 6 juin 2019 09:50:16 GMT+02:00, "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo <at> gnu.org> a écrit :
>Hello,
>
>Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> skribis:
>
>> On the 'core-updates' branch, `make dist-info` fails like so:
>>
>> $ make dist-info
>> MAKEINFO doc/guix.de.info
>> ./doc/guix.de.texi:26832: @menu reference to nonexistent node
>`Vorbereitung, um die Bootstrap-Binrdateien zu verwenden'
>> ./doc/guix.de.texi:26837: warning: node `Vorbereitung' is next for
>`Reduced Binary Seed Bootstrap' in sectioning but not in menu
>> ./doc/guix.de.texi:26884: Next reference to nonexistent `um die
>Bootstrap-Binrdateien zu verwenden'
>> make: *** [Makefile:3929: doc/guix.de.info] Error 1
>
>I believe this has to do with the fact that, in ‘core-updates’,
>“Reduced
>Binary Seed Bootstrap” is a new node.
>
>Julien, any idea what’s going on?
>
>Thanks,
>Ludo’.
Isn't there a comma in a node name? There shouldn't be any, it makes texinfo confused.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35913
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 06 Jun 2019 08:23:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 35913 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 10:09:23AM +0200, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Isn't there a comma in a node name? There shouldn't be any, it makes texinfo confused.
>
>
>
Sorry! Please remove the comma from “Preparing to Use the Bootstrap
Binaries”’ translation.
Reply sent
to
Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 07 Apr 2020 19:37:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 07 Apr 2020 19:37:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 35913-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
This is no longer an issue.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 06 May 2020 11:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 354 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.