GNU bug report logs - #36330
guix-build-branch.sh failed on Fedora 29

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 36330 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 36330 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: guix-build-branch.sh failed on Fedora 29
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:25:44 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

[mwette <at> localhost guix-1.0.1]$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 5.1.11-200.fc29.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 17 
19:30:44 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[mwette <at> localhost guix-1.0.1]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 29 (Twenty Nine)

test-suite.log attached

config.log attached

[config.log (text/x-log, attachment)]

[test-suite.log (text/x-log, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36330: guix-build-branch.sh failed on Fedora 29
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:26:22 +0200

Hi Matt,

Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> FAIL: tests/guix-build-branch
> =============================
>
> accepted connection from pid 18056, user mwette
> + guix build --version
> guix build (GNU Guix) 1.0.1
> Copyright (C) 2019 the Guix authors
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
> + guile -c '(getaddrinfo "www.gnu.org" "80" AI_NUMERICSERV)'
> ++ guix build guile-gcrypt -d
> accepted connection from pid 18073, user mwette
> + orig_drv=/home/mwette/proj/guix/guix-1.0.1/test-tmp/store/18ck9672wax2asspiin305l3drpjq8g3-guile-gcrypt-0.1.0.drv
> ++ guix build guile-gcrypt --with-branch=guile-gcrypt=master -d
> accepted connection from pid 18078, user mwette
> updating checkout of 'https://notabug.org/cwebber/guile-gcrypt.git'...
> guix build: error: cannot fetch branch 'master' from https://notabug.org/cwebber/guile-gcrypt.git: failed to resolve path '/home/mwette/proj/guix/guix-1.0.1/test-tmp/var/18047/cache-18047/guix/checkouts/yxwtks42sv5sew5opm5xd3umk7xmxwfr2vgde5nsbfj6fmb5epmq': No such file or directory

It looks like the directory where Guix was attempting to store the
checkout of guile-gcrypt disappeared under its feet.  I wonder if this
could be due to parallel builds (“make check -j”).

Does it work if you run this test specifically?

  make check TESTS=tests/guix-build-branch.sh

?

Regardless, this is a harmless issue.

Thank you,
Ludo’.

Message #11 received at 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36330: guix-build-branch.sh failed on Fedora 29
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 05:37:56 -0700

On 6/24/19 1:26 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:

> make check TESTS=tests/guix-build-branch.sh

I did not use "-j" and the above fails also.

In addition,

$ guix install glibc-locales

failed as well.  I don't remember the error message.
I will see if I can find a log.

Thanks for responding,
Matt

Message #14 received at 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36330: guix-build-branch.sh failed on Fedora 29
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 20:54:25 +0200

Hello,

Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> On 6/24/19 1:26 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> make check TESTS=tests/guix-build-branch.sh
>
> I did not use "-j" and the above fails also.

Does it fail in the same way?

What does this command return:

  readlink -f /home/mwette/proj/guix/guix-1.0.1/test-tmp/var

?

> In addition,
>
> $ guix install glibc-locales
>
> failed as well.  I don't remember the error message.
> I will see if I can find a log.

Please open a separate bug report when you have more info.

Thank you,
Ludo’.

Message #17 received at 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36330: guix-build-branch.sh failed on Fedora 29
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:31:54 -0700

On 6/24/19 11:54 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:

> readlink -f /home/mwette/proj/guix/guix-1.0.1/test-tmp/var

[mwette <at> localhost ~]$ readlink -f /home/mwette/proj/guix/guix-1.0.1/test-tmp/var

/home/mwette/proj/guix/guix-1.0.1/test-tmp/var

Message #20 received at 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36330: guix-build-branch.sh failed on Fedora 29
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:02:45 +0200

Hello Matt,

Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> On 6/24/19 11:54 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> readlink -f /home/mwette/proj/guix/guix-1.0.1/test-tmp/var
>
> [mwette <at> localhost ~]$ readlink -f /home/mwette/proj/guix/guix-1.0.1/test-tmp/var
>
> /home/mwette/proj/guix/guix-1.0.1/test-tmp/var

Hmm I’m running out of ideas.

Would you like to edit the test, add ‘strace -s 200 -o log’ there before
the “guix build --with-branch” command?

Thanks for helping,
Ludo’.

Message #23 received at 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36330: guix-build-branch.sh failed on Fedora 29
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:13:03 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

> Would you like to edit the test, add ‘strace -s 200 -o log’ there before
> the “guix build --with-branch” command?
>
> Thanks for helping,
> Ludo’.

log attached

[log (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #26 received at 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36330: guix-build-branch.sh failed on Fedora 29
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 17:10:02 +0200

Hi Matt,

Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com> skribis:

>> Would you like to edit the test, add ‘strace -s 200 -o log’ there before
>> the “guix build --with-branch” command?
>>
>> Thanks for helping,
>> Ludo’.
>
> log attached
>
> execve("/home/mwette/proj/guix/guix-1.0.1/scripts/guix", ["guix",
> "build", "--version"], 0x7ffd701d92e0 /* 76 vars

I was interested in the strace log of “guix build --with-branch”, not
that of “guix build --version”.  :-)

Could you send it?

Thanks, and apologies for the delay.

Ludo’.

Message #29 received at 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36330: guix-build-branch.sh failed on Fedora 29
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 20:30:45 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

hoping this does the trick

On 7/2/19 8:10 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>>> Would you like to edit the test, add ‘strace -s 200 -o log’ there before
>>> the “guix build --with-branch” command?
>>>
>>> Thanks for helping,
>>> Ludo’.
>> log attached
>>
>> execve("/home/mwette/proj/guix/guix-1.0.1/scripts/guix", ["guix",
>> "build", "--version"], 0x7ffd701d92e0 /* 76 vars
> I was interested in the strace log of “guix build --with-branch”, not
> that of “guix build --version”.  :-)
>
> Could you send it?
>
> Thanks, and apologies for the delay.
>
> Ludo’.

[log (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #32 received at 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36330: guix-build-branch.sh failed on Fedora 29
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 11:29:15 +0200

Hi Matt,

Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> write(2, "updating checkout of 'https://notabug.org/cwebber/guile-gcrypt.git'...\n", 71) = 71
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib64/libgit2.la", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)

It seems that your installation of Guile-Git fails to load libgit2, and
thus doesn’t work at all.  Could you check if that is the case?

(Besides, unless you want to build from source, I’d recommend using the
binary tarball to get Guix set up quickly:
<https://gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Binary-Installation.html>.)

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Message #35 received at 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 36330 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36330: guix-build-branch.sh failed on Fedora 29
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 07:12:50 -0700

On 7/4/19 2:29 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Matt Wette <matt.wette <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> write(2, "updating checkout of 'https://notabug.org/cwebber/guile-gcrypt.git'...\n", 71) = 71
>> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib64/libgit2.la", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> It seems that your installation of Guile-Git fails to load libgit2, and
> thus doesn’t work at all.  Could you check if that is the case?
>
> (Besides, unless you want to build from source, I’d recommend using the
> binary tarball to get Guix set up quickly:
> <https://gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Binary-Installation.html>.)
>

I will look into the binary.  Thanks for taking the time on this.

Matt

Message #40 received at 36330-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: 36330-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Close
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 19:28:34 +0100

This is a very old issue, and it does not look like we can do anything
more; closing it.

Andreas

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.