GNU bug report logs - #36851
[PATCH] Add rclone-browser

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix-patches; Reported by: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@HIDDEN>; Keywords: patch; dated Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:18:01 UTC; Maintainer for guix-patches is guix-patches@HIDDEN.

Message received at 36851 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 36851) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2019 08:44:55 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 05 04:44:55 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34693 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1i5nNv-0001J3-CA
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 04:44:55 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56262)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1i5nNt-0001Iq-Mv
 for 36851 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 04:44:54 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33276)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1i5nNo-0005JZ-I7; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 04:44:48 -0400
Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=53260 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1i5nNn-000291-U3; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 04:44:48 -0400
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#36851] [PATCH] Add rclone-browser
References: <87blxcos1n.fsf@HIDDEN> <87a7bk5jsl.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87a7bkoxjs.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 19 Fructidor an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 10:44:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87a7bkoxjs.fsf@HIDDEN> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
 "Wed, 04 Sep 2019 18:07:03 +0200")
Message-ID: <87y2z3gmip.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36851
Cc: 36851 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hello,

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@HIDDEN> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>>> * gnu/packages/sync.scm (rclone-browser): New variable.
>>
>> LGTM!
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
>> Note that, as noted in =E2=80=98HACKING=E2=80=99, it=E2=80=99s the kind =
of change that you can
>> push quickly if you don=E2=80=99t get any feedback.
>
> Well, this one had a question: should I also propagate `rclone'? Since
> I wasn't sure about it, I didn't applied the patch.

Oh indeed, sorry.  The general rule is that propagation should be
avoided as much as possible.  Is there a way you could =E2=80=98substitute*=
=E2=80=99 the
reference to =E2=80=98rclone=E2=80=99 in =E2=80=98rclone-browser=E2=80=99?

> Also, there is an issue : according to
> <https://martins.ninja/RcloneBrowser/>, the project is no longer active
> nor maintained.
>
> Should we bother anymore and package it?

It depends.  In general we=E2=80=99d rather not package unmaintained softwa=
re.
However, there are cases where people do rely on unmaintained software,
for better or worse.

If you think that there=E2=80=99s no other options that fits the bill for y=
ou as
a user, maybe it=E2=80=99s a sign that we should package it, possibly remov=
ing
it later down the road.  Otherwise, perhaps we shouldn=E2=80=99t bother.

WDYT?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to guix-patches@HIDDEN:
bug#36851; Package guix-patches. Full text available.

Message received at 36851 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 36851) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2019 16:07:11 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 04 12:07:11 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34202 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1i5XoK-0006Dp-Af
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 12:07:11 -0400
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:47815)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1i5XoI-0006Dh-D3
 for 36851 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 12:07:07 -0400
X-Originating-IP: 185.131.40.67
Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67])
 (Authenticated sender: admin@HIDDEN)
 by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 505241C0004;
 Wed,  4 Sep 2019 16:07:04 +0000 (UTC)
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#36851] [PATCH] Add rclone-browser
References: <87blxcos1n.fsf@HIDDEN> <87a7bk5jsl.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 18:07:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87a7bk5jsl.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?=
 =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:26:50 +0200")
Message-ID: <87a7bkoxjs.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36851
Cc: 36851 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

Hello,

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> writes:

>> * gnu/packages/sync.scm (rclone-browser): New variable.
>
> LGTM!

Thank you for the review.

> Note that, as noted in =E2=80=98HACKING=E2=80=99, it=E2=80=99s the kind o=
f change that you can
> push quickly if you don=E2=80=99t get any feedback.

Well, this one had a question: should I also propagate `rclone'? Since
I wasn't sure about it, I didn't applied the patch.

Also, there is an issue : according to
<https://martins.ninja/RcloneBrowser/>, the project is no longer active
nor maintained.

Should we bother anymore and package it?

Regards,

--=20
Nicolas Goaziou




Information forwarded to guix-patches@HIDDEN:
bug#36851; Package guix-patches. Full text available.

Message received at 36851 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 36851) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2019 12:27:00 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 04 08:27:00 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60956 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1i5UNI-0004gC-Ef
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:27:00 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38866)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1i5UNG-0004fx-TD
 for 36851 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:26:59 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44538)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1i5UNB-0002Qf-QI; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:26:53 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=42458 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1i5UN9-0006h6-TB; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:26:52 -0400
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#36851] [PATCH] Add rclone-browser
References: <87blxcos1n.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:26:50 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87blxcos1n.fsf@HIDDEN> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
 "Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:17:08 +0200")
Message-ID: <87a7bk5jsl.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36851
Cc: 36851 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi,

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@HIDDEN> skribis:

>>From d1765e2c4516f27574caa175883b21a7cdb9679f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@HIDDEN>
> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:11:04 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add rclone-browser.
>
> * gnu/packages/sync.scm (rclone-browser): New variable.

LGTM!

Note that, as noted in =E2=80=98HACKING=E2=80=99, it=E2=80=99s the kind of =
change that you can
push quickly if you don=E2=80=99t get any feedback.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to guix-patches@HIDDEN:
bug#36851; Package guix-patches. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jul 2019 08:17:18 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 30 04:17:18 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49500 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hsNJu-0004WI-Ae
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 04:17:18 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36693)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1hsNJs-0004WA-Dm
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 04:17:17 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50737)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1hsNJr-0007W4-4J
 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 04:17:16 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1hsNJp-0006KB-RA
 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 04:17:15 -0400
Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:42943)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>)
 id 1hsNJp-0006Hp-C6
 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 04:17:13 -0400
Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67])
 (Authenticated sender: admin@HIDDEN)
 by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DDB4200004
 for <guix-patches@HIDDEN>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:17:09 +0000 (UTC)
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@HIDDEN>
To: guix-patches@HIDDEN
Subject: [PATCH] Add rclone-browser
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:17:08 +0200
Message-ID: <87blxcos1n.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 217.70.178.232
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Hello,

The following patch adds Rclone-browser, a simple GUI for Rclone.

Note: I added Rclone as a propagated input, but I'm not sure about this.
I.e., it builds without that input, but it is then unusable. Do we
consider users are responsible for installing Rclone themselves anyway?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/x-diff
Content-Disposition: inline; filename=0001-gnu-Add-rclone-browser.patch
Content-Description: Add rclone-browser

From d1765e2c4516f27574caa175883b21a7cdb9679f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:11:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add rclone-browser.

* gnu/packages/sync.scm (rclone-browser): New variable.
---
 gnu/packages/sync.scm | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/sync.scm b/gnu/packages/sync.scm
index 1c80b7978e..57421114a3 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/sync.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/sync.scm
@@ -285,3 +285,83 @@ Features include:
 @end itemize")
     (home-page "https://rclone.org/")
     (license license:expat)))
+
+(define-public rclone-browser
+  (package
+    (name "rclone-browser")
+    (version "1.2")
+    (source (origin
+              (method git-fetch)
+              (uri (git-reference
+                    (url "https://github.com/mmozeiko/RcloneBrowser.git")
+                    (commit version)))
+              (file-name (git-file-name name version))
+              (sha256
+               (base32
+                "1ldradd5c606mfkh46y4mhcvf9kbjhamw0gahksp9w43h5dh3ir7"))))
+    (build-system cmake-build-system)
+    (arguments
+     `(#:tests? #f                      ;no test
+       #:phases
+       (modify-phases %standard-phases
+         (add-after 'unpack 'fix-hard-coded-paths
+           (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
+             (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")))
+               (substitute* "scripts/rclone-browser.desktop"
+                 (("/usr/") (string-append out "/")))
+               #t))))))
+    (inputs
+     `(("qtbase" ,qtbase)))
+    (propagated-inputs
+     `(("rclone" ,rclone)))
+    (home-page "https://martins.ninja/RcloneBrowser/")
+    (synopsis "Simple cross platfrom GUI for rclone command line tool")
+    (description "RcloneBrowser is a GUI for Rclone.
+
+Its features are:
+
+@itemize
+
+@item Allows to browse and modify any Rclone remote, including
+encrypted ones;
+
+@item Uses same configuration file as Rclone, no extra configuration
+required;
+
+@item Supports custom location and encryption for @file{.rclone.conf}
+configuration file;
+
+@item Simultaneously navigate multiple repositories in separate tabs;
+
+@item Lists files hierarchically with file name, size and modify date;
+
+@item All Rclone commands are executed asynchronously, no freezing
+GUI;
+
+@item File hierarchy is lazily cached in memory, for faster traversal
+of folders;
+
+@item Allows to upload, download, create new folders, rename or delete
+files and folders;
+
+@item Allows to calculate size of folder, export list of files and
+copy Rclone command to clipboard;
+
+@item Can process multiple upload or download jobs in background;
+
+@item Drag & drop support for dragging files from local file explorer
+for uploading;
+
+@item Streaming media files for playback in player like mpv or
+similar;
+
+@item Mount and unmount folders;
+
+@item Optionally minimizes to tray, with notifications when
+upload/download finishes;
+
+@item Supports portable mode (create @file{.ini} file next to
+executable with same name), Rclone and @file{.rclone.conf} path now
+can be relative to executable.
+@end itemize")
+    (license license:unlicense)))
-- 
2.22.0


--=-=-=--




Acknowledgement sent to Nicolas Goaziou <mail@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to guix-patches@HIDDEN:
bug#36851; Package guix-patches. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.