Received: (at 36992) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2019 21:17:20 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 09 17:17:20 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43309 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hwCGG-0004NP-1f for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 17:17:20 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21225) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rekado@HIDDEN>) id 1hwCGE-0004NC-Ax for 36992 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 17:17:19 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565385432; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=Jc2PhHXZpN49a5f2q9QHhIYXJBa+ANpuzmNPV0kiXS1gY96zdVhiojiWhgyUFYwFVqkgQK1fICJlfQrcOu5tPQoIlsk+a2J8vrNjNclj3Rz2AIq0GWrtIWu9A686RBInCgANhPefu+akcu7LbyD8ljHD0jJQvJXhKdmL3olT9FA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1565385432; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=oIQVzMGr0tf8YejdfWGsf0U07UFTZrSW21or0Qf22R4=; b=LhrGwvahjIZPFNfMKzz1Q9vMlboM37lEJBi/3YLIbTOt/4qA1abc3zOXYZKEa4j16nD6rrhE+B+GE/BBVHf1dWWFjtNbteMfdWH6L/dFijJjPhHV3WjMY+lcjirbRxrLBfTLAdwEDalxZHAHE5ca1TbnIglAA8dK5MFaFSq1ojE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@HIDDEN; dmarc=pass header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN> header.from=<rekado@HIDDEN> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1565385432; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@HIDDEN; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=1393; bh=oIQVzMGr0tf8YejdfWGsf0U07UFTZrSW21or0Qf22R4=; b=BiiugISAFR0c2avrMT3a/ezfv811zD4kAgiV7cQ5iUdC81XF98dak1lOgvDvegir jWUez/ua/1zqdr0mrm/jYG9upISDMQfUoYuuXQfGQMIcWP6ZKUQHZ9HDry++A4eDjtf +6LKLTU1iaXffZ8gdnFO3dt5NbCkmC6cNdmU66lc= Received: from localhost (p54AD4F42.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.79.66]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1565385430866607.5465878879648; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 14:17:10 -0700 (PDT) References: <87ftmafa6u.fsf@HIDDEN> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.2 From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN> To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#36992: linux-libre-5.2.7 failed to build on armhf and aarch64; why? In-reply-to: <87ftmafa6u.fsf@HIDDEN> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 23:17:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhkiujho.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36992 Cc: 36992 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Mark, > linux-libre-5.2.7 failed to build on Berlin due to a dependency failure: > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=3Dlinux-libre-5 > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1556871/details > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1556831/details > > I guess that the deblobbing derivation probably failed, but I don't see > a way to confirm this, or to find out what specifically went wrong. > > Specifically, I'd like to know: > > (1) Which derivations failed, that caused these dependency failures? Some time ago I added a feature to Cuirass that allowed us to see what dependency was responsible. This worked through a somewhat awkward processing of derivation files. I guess that this no longer works since the representation of derivation inputs has changed. I=E2=80=99ll try to verify this later and fix this if possible. It would be great if we didn=E2=80=99t have to do this and Cuirass were abl= e to record enough information when the build failed=E2=80=A6 > (2) Were the failed build logs saved, and if so, how can I see them? This also used to work before. I=E2=80=99ll also look into that. Previous= ly there would be a link to the logs on the details page. > (3) Did the failed derivations time out, or was it another kind of failur= e? I guess the logs =E2=80=94 once available =E2=80=94 will help us answer thi= s question. -- Ricardo
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#36992
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2019 18:47:01 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 09 14:47:01 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43271 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hw9un-0000SS-0u for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:47:01 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56912) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1hw9ul-0000SH-FU for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:47:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50711) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1hw9uk-0004hW-AE for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:46:59 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1hw9uj-0005ne-5Y for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:46:58 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:44136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1hw9uj-0005nP-2G for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:46:57 -0400 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1hw9uh-0004sh-C5; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:46:55 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Subject: linux-libre-5.2.7 failed to build on armhf and aarch64; why? Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:46:38 -0400 Message-ID: <87ftmafa6u.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 64.112.178.59 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) linux-libre-5.2.7 failed to build on Berlin due to a dependency failure: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=linux-libre-5 https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1556871/details https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1556831/details I guess that the deblobbing derivation probably failed, but I don't see a way to confirm this, or to find out what specifically went wrong. Specifically, I'd like to know: (1) Which derivations failed, that caused these dependency failures? (2) Were the failed build logs saved, and if so, how can I see them? (3) Did the failed derivations time out, or was it another kind of failure? Can someone help me find out what's going on here? Thanks, Mark
Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
:bug-guix@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#36992
; Package guix
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.