GNU bug report logs -
#37350
[PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align.
Previous Next
Reported by: Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 04:49:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 37350 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 37350 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37350
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 09 Sep 2019 04:49:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 09 Sep 2019 04:49:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
See attached.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[0001-gnu-emacs-interactive-align-Update-to-0.4.2-1.e1308c.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37350
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 37350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> From fcdecc8e29fb4654d44c842a7efd4f266dde47ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:46:32 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-interactive-align: Update to 0.4.2-1.e1308c8.
>
> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-interactive-align): Update to 0.4.2-1.e1308c8.
Should we wait for the next upstream release instead of using what looks
like an arbitrary commit?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37350
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 11 Sep 2019 19:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 37350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Ludo,
I've attached an alternate update, which updates from the current Guix's
0.1.0 to 0.4.2 instead of from 0.1.0 to 0.4.2-some-commit.
I feel like the update to the nonversioned tree is slightly preferable
since of the seven commits where the nonversioned tree is ahead, five are
bugfixes and/or small refactors, one is a Readme change, and only one is a
feature addition. But I don't feel too strongly either way.
Best,
Brian
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:15 PM Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > From fcdecc8e29fb4654d44c842a7efd4f266dde47ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:46:32 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-interactive-align: Update to 0.4.2-1.e1308c8.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-interactive-align): Update to
> 0.4.2-1.e1308c8.
>
> Should we wait for the next upstream release instead of using what looks
> like an arbitrary commit?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[0001-gnu-emacs-interactive-align-Update-to-0.4.2.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Reply sent
to
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Thu, 12 Sep 2019 21:26:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Thu, 12 Sep 2019 21:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 37350-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> I've attached an alternate update, which updates from the current Guix's
> 0.1.0 to 0.4.2 instead of from 0.1.0 to 0.4.2-some-commit.
Applied!
> I feel like the update to the nonversioned tree is slightly preferable
> since of the seven commits where the nonversioned tree is ahead, five are
> bugfixes and/or small refactors, one is a Readme change, and only one is a
> feature addition. But I don't feel too strongly either way.
Yeah, but then I’d argue that upstream should cut a new release.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:24:11 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 170 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.