GNU logs - #37753, boring messages

Message sent to bug-grep@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#37753: wish for glob(7)-like matcher
Resent-From: "Trent W. Buck" <trentbuck@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-grep@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 01:44:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.37753.B.157110380612621 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 37753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:43:14 +1100
From: "Trent W. Buck" <trentbuck@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <20191015014312.GA2797@HIDDEN>
References: <20160201071906.8528.29704.reportbug@frey>
 <20160201071906.8528.29704.reportbug@frey>
 <20190926150716.GA30404@bartik>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190926150716.GA30404@bartik>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Package: grep
Version: 2.20-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream

This bug was originally reported as
https://bugs.debian.org/813356

I am attempting to upstream it into bugs.gnu.org.

PS: nowadays I also know to mention fnmatch(3).


On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 18:19:06 +1100 "Trent W. Buck" <trentbuck@HIDDEN> wrote:
> Sometimes I want to match globs instead of regexps.
> glob(7) explicitly says:
>   "they match filenames, rather than text"
> I don't see why globs shouldn't be used for text.
>
>
> In bash this is ugly and *SLOW*, e.g.
>
>     # Print log lines that match no "whitelisted" patterns.
>     while read -r line
>     do
>         if ! [[ line = glob1 || line = glob2 || ... ]]
>         then echo "$line"
>         fi
>     done <log
>
> instead of
>
>     grep --basic-glob -vf whitelist log
>
>
> GNU grep already has options for fixed strings (-F),
> and BRE, ERE and PCRE.  Can we have one for glob(7)?
>
> AFAICT nobody has asked for this before; this surprises me,
> because it "feels" like it should be easy to implement.
>
> Am I wrong?
>
> Is there a good reason to WONTFIX this?
>
>
>
> I asked my peers and the only real counterargument I got was
> "just learn regexps, you'll need them eventually".
>
> For my use case, I think globs would be more readable (esp. not having
> to escape dots and parens), and easier to teach to non-technical staff.
> (I haven't trialled it yet, because I don't have a globber that's as
> fast as GNU grep is for regexps.)
>
>
> PS: I'd have directly reported this upstream,
> but https://sv.gnu.org/bugs/?group=grep says I must be a "project member",
> and I'm not.

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: "Trent W. Buck" <trentbuck@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#37753: Acknowledgement (wish for glob(7)-like matcher)
Message-ID: <handler.37753.B.157110380612621.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <20191015014312.GA2797@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 37753
X-Gnu-PR-Package: grep
Reply-To: 37753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 01:44:01 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-grep@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 37753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
37753: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D37753
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-grep@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#37753: glob in grep
References: <20191015014312.GA2797@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <20191015014312.GA2797@HIDDEN>
Resent-From: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-grep@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 04:24:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.37753.B37753.157361902432611 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 37753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 03:17:29 +0000
From: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <20191113031729.GB17080@millbarge>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hello, I know I've wanted this feature before, if for nothing else an easy
way to test various glob patterns against various inputs without having to
create a bunch of files in the filesystem.

Thanks

Message sent to bug-grep@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#37753: wish for glob(7)-like matcher
Resent-From: Stephane Chazelas <stephane.chazelas@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-grep@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:06:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.37753.B.15736683159901 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 37753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Stephane Chazelas <stephane.chazelas@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:00:50 +0000
Message-ID: <20191113180050.zunrwsfjmcxmg4pf@HIDDEN>
References: <20160201071906.8528.29704.reportbug@frey>
 <20160201071906.8528.29704.reportbug@frey>
 <20190926150716.GA30404@bartik> <20191015014312.GA2797@HIDDEN>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191015014312.GA2797@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

2019-10-15 12:43:14 +1100, Trent W. Buck:
[...]
> > GNU grep already has options for fixed strings (-F),
> > and BRE, ERE and PCRE.  Can we have one for glob(7)?
> >
> > AFAICT nobody has asked for this before; this surprises me,
> > because it "feels" like it should be easy to implement.
> >
> > Am I wrong?
[...]

For the record, ast-open's "grep" has 

  -K, --ksh-regexp
	ksh(1) extended file match patterns.

That's ksh93 wildcards, a superset of bash -O extglob ones
(themselves shaped after ksh88's globs) with same feature level
as regexps.

$ echo abcde | ast-grep -Ko '?c?'
bcd


You can always define a POSIX shell function like:

fnmatch() (
  pattern=${1?}; shift
  cat -- "$@" | while IFS= read -r line || [ -n "$line" ]; do
    case $line in ($pattern) printf '%s\n' "$line"
  done
)

(though that will be very slow, especially with shells that
don't have "printf" or "[" builtin; and except in zsh, it won't
work properly with input containing NUL bytes).

Note that there is some variation in wildcard syntax from one
shell to the next and one or from one fnmatch() to the next
(though they generally support the minimum POSIX set at least).

There's also the question of whether you'd want to consider \ as
an escape operator (again YMMV depending on the shell for that
fnmatch() function above).

-- 
Stephane

Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.