GNU bug report logs -
#37761
man pages not displaying on Guix System 1.0.1 fresh install
Previous Next
Reported by: Kenan Toker <kenan <at> kdtsh.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:27:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 37761 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 37761 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37761
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:27:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Kenan Toker <kenan <at> kdtsh.net>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:27:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi bug-guix,
I’m emailing about an issue I was having with man pages, where man pages
were not displaying on a fresh install of Guix System 1.0.1 on a
Thinkpad x200 laptop. I did not experience the issue at any point on
another install of Guix, which I had installed using the Guix System
1.0.0 installer in a QEMU virtual machine. I’ve outlined the issue
further along in this email.
The issue:
After I had installed man-db and man-pages, if I ran e.g. `man ls`, I
got an empty man page with the following at the footer of the page:
Manual page ls(1) line ?/? (END) (press h for help or q to quit)
I was able to use the h key to look for help with man. When I pressed q
to quit, I got a message like the following from stdout:
man: command exited with status 255: (cd
/run/current-system/profile/share/man &&
/gnu/store/[...]-man-db-2.8.5/libexec/man-db/zsoelim) | [...]
To replicate the issue:
1. Do a clean install of Guix System using the 1.0.1 installer. The
nurses installation wizard is used with standard settings, no WM/DE,
and with one ext4 filesystem on / with disk encryption and a swap
partition.
2. Install `man-db’, either as a package in a profile or as a package
in the OS configuration - in the case of the latter, do a `guix
system reconfigure’ with the new OS configuration.
3. Run the man command with any input, e.g. `man ls’ or `man pwd’.
4. Install any other package, e.g. emacs, and run the man command with
this too, i.e. `man emacs’.
My `solution’:
My solution was to do a fresh install of Guix System 1.0.0 (using the
ncurses installation wizard and with very similar settings, and doing
the fix for %base-packages) on my x200 laptop and update to the latest
distribution, which has made the issue go away; however, I was never
able to make the issue go away on my original Guix System 1.0.1
installation.
Of course, I can’t blame the issue on the installation image without
having a bigger picture of how the software works, but the installation
image I used is the only difference I could find between the two systems
I installed (with the caveat that I never tried installing Guix System
1.0.1 on a VM). If this can be replicated by anyone else, maybe there is
an issue with the installation image. If not, let me know if there is
any troubleshooting I can do which could be of use - I’m happy to do a
fresh install on my x200 and run any diagnostics you’d like me to.
Thanks,
Kenan
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Reply sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 27 Sep 2022 20:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Kenan Toker <kenan <at> kdtsh.net>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 27 Sep 2022 20:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 37761-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Kenan,
Kenan Toker <kenan <at> kdtsh.net> writes:
> Hi bug-guix,
>
> I’m emailing about an issue I was having with man pages, where man pages
> were not displaying on a fresh install of Guix System 1.0.1 on a
> Thinkpad x200 laptop. I did not experience the issue at any point on
> another install of Guix, which I had installed using the Guix System
> 1.0.0 installer in a QEMU virtual machine. I’ve outlined the issue
> further along in this email.
>
> The issue:
> After I had installed man-db and man-pages, if I ran e.g. `man ls`, I
> got an empty man page with the following at the footer of the page:
>
> Manual page ls(1) line ?/? (END) (press h for help or q to quit)
>
> I was able to use the h key to look for help with man. When I pressed q
> to quit, I got a message like the following from stdout:
>
> man: command exited with status 255: (cd
> /run/current-system/profile/share/man &&
> /gnu/store/[...]-man-db-2.8.5/libexec/man-db/zsoelim) | [...]
>
>
> To replicate the issue:
>
> 1. Do a clean install of Guix System using the 1.0.1 installer. The
> nurses installation wizard is used with standard settings, no WM/DE,
> and with one ext4 filesystem on / with disk encryption and a swap
> partition.
> 2. Install `man-db’, either as a package in a profile or as a package
> in the OS configuration - in the case of the latter, do a `guix
> system reconfigure’ with the new OS configuration.
> 3. Run the man command with any input, e.g. `man ls’ or `man pwd’.
> 4. Install any other package, e.g. emacs, and run the man command with
> this too, i.e. `man emacs’.
Sorry for failing to get back to you earlier; I suppose this is fixed in
newer versions, the latest released one which is 1.3.0, so I'll close
it. Please re-open the issue if it's still actual.
Thank you!
Maxim
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:24:12 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 183 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.