GNU bug report logs - #38267
upgrade brlaser

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:07:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 38267 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 38267 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#38267; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:07:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:07:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: upgrade brlaser
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:06:07 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi, yesterday I notified brlaser maintainer that a package is available on
guix and he asked us to upgrade (https://github.com/pdewacht/brlaser/pull/55),
so here's the patch.

I moved from using the commit # to the released version.
Since the let block was not needed anymore, the patch is unnecessary ugly,
let me know if I need to format it differently

Thanks, Nicolò

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[0001-gnu-packages-printers.scm-brlaser-Update-to-v6.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Reply sent to Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 19 Nov 2019 21:06:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 19 Nov 2019 21:06:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 38267-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms <at> gmail.com>,
 38267-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#38267] upgrade brlaser
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 22:05:09 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hi, yesterday I notified brlaser maintainer that a package is available on
> guix and he asked us to upgrade (https://github.com/pdewacht/brlaser/pull/55),
> so here's the patch.

Nice, applied (with a conventional commit message), thank you!

I will happily accept a follow-up patch that removes all the printer
product names with something like "known to work with a wide array of
Brother printers, consult @url{foo,https://bar} for the full list".

WDYT?  :-)

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 129 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.