GNU bug report logs -
#38357
babl-0.1.72 build failure (test failure) - dependency for gimp
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 38357 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 38357 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38357
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 24 Nov 2019 03:21:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Christopher Howard <christopher <at> librehacker.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 24 Nov 2019 03:21:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
21/25 transparent OK 4.29 s
22/25 alpha_symmetric_transform FAIL 0.12 s (exit
status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)
23/25 types OK 0.07 s
24/25 concurrency-stress-test OK 0.27 s
25/25 palette-concurrency-stress-test OK 0.42 s
Ok: 24
Expected Fail: 0
Fail: 1
Unexpected Pass: 0
Skipped: 0
Timeout: 0
The output from the failed tests:
22/25 alpha_symmetric_transform FAIL 0.12 s (exit
status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)
--- command ---
BABL_PATH='/tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/extensions'
LD_LIBRARY_PATH='/tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/babl'
GI_TYPELIB_PATH='/tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/babl'
/tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/tests/alpha_symmetric_transform
--- stdout ---
--- stderr ---
../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
separate alpha 10.2: 100000.007812500!=100000.000000000(ref)
../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
separate alpha 11.1: 49999.996093750!=50000.000000000(ref)
../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
separate alpha 11.2: 499999.968750000!=500000.000000000(ref)
../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
associatd-alpha 10.2: 100000.007812500!=100000.000000000(ref)
../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
associatd-alpha 11.1: 49999.992187500!=50000.000000000(ref)
../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
associatd-alpha 11.2: 499999.937500000!=500000.000000000(ref)
-------
Full log written to /tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/meson-
logs/testlog.txt
FAILED: meson-test
/gnu/store/bwwjw6gqp38qi4s9xj1qrbrhzr9r6cl1-meson-for-build-
0.50.1/bin/meson test --no-rebuild --print-errorlogs
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
command "ninja" "test" failed with status 1
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38357
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 24 Nov 2019 13:08:20 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38357
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:11:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 38357 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Christopher,
Thanks for the bug report!
Christopher Howard 写道:
> 22/25 alpha_symmetric_transform FAIL 0.12 s
> (exit
I've built master's babl a few times now, the damned thing keeps
succeeding:
λ guix describe
[…]
guix 39bf4e0
repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
branch: master
commit: 39bf4e0bad499aa6f9388164e73197a501915ff6
λ guix build --no-grafts babl
/gnu/store/qzz0qv5llrfb6ls8018yjkwg55lk26yk-babl-0.1.72
λ guix build --no-grafts babl --check # a few times
[…]
/gnu/store/qzz0qv5llrfb6ls8018yjkwg55lk26yk-babl-0.1.72
λ guix build --no-grafts babl --check --dry-run
The following derivation would be built:
/gnu/store/lxp5a15sz59fyx8lqf1yj68c5040q201-babl-0.1.72.drv
What does the last command return for you? If it's different,
please ‘guix pull’ and try again. If it's the same, you found a
non-deterministic (or hardware-specific) test failure in babl.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38357
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 25 Nov 2019 21:31:28 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38357
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:29:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
skribis:
> Christopher Howard 写道:
>> 22/25 alpha_symmetric_transform FAIL 0.12 s (exit
>
> I've built master's babl a few times now, the damned thing keeps
> succeeding:
It failed on berlin:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/qzz0qv5llrfb6ls8018yjkwg55lk26yk-babl-0.1.72
So the test must be numerically unstable or something.
Does upstream have patches or bug reports?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38357
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:29:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38357
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:43:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 38357 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
> skribis:
>
>> Christopher Howard 写道:
>>> 22/25 alpha_symmetric_transform FAIL 0.12 s (exit
>>
>> I've built master's babl a few times now, the damned thing keeps
>> succeeding:
>
> It failed on berlin:
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/qzz0qv5llrfb6ls8018yjkwg55lk26yk-babl-0.1.72
>
> So the test must be numerically unstable or something.
>
> Does upstream have patches or bug reports?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
>
>
>
This still looks like an on-going issue. I am where Tobias is at, I
can't reproduce this on my machine which lends me to believe you are
right, Ludo'.
Interestingly, the store object hashes are matching.
http://berlin.guixsd.org/log/qzz0qv5llrfb6ls8018yjkwg55lk26yk-babl-0.1.72
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
22/25 alpha_symmetric_transform FAIL 0.17 s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)
23/25 types OK 0.12 s
24/25 concurrency-stress-test OK 0.37 s
25/25 palette-concurrency-stress-test OK 0.62 s
Ok: 24
Expected Fail: 0
Fail: 1
Unexpected Pass: 0
Skipped: 0
Timeout: 0
The output from the failed tests:
22/25 alpha_symmetric_transform FAIL 0.17 s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)
--- command ---
LD_LIBRARY_PATH='/tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/babl' GI_TYPELIB_PATH='/tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/babl' BABL_PATH='/tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/extensions' /tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/tests/alpha_symmetric_transform
--- stdout ---
--- stderr ---
../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
separate alpha 10.2: 100000.007812500!=100000.000000000(ref)
../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
separate alpha 11.1: 49999.996093750!=50000.000000000(ref)
../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
separate alpha 11.2: 499999.968750000!=500000.000000000(ref)
../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
associatd-alpha 10.2: 100000.007812500!=100000.000000000(ref)
../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
associatd-alpha 11.1: 49999.992187500!=50000.000000000(ref)
../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
associatd-alpha 11.2: 499999.937500000!=500000.000000000(ref)
-------
Full log written to /tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/meson-logs/testlog.txt
FAILED: meson-test
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Perhaps we should work around the singular failing test-case and open a
report upstream to include in a comment?
Wdyt?
--
Brett M. Gilio
GNU Guix, Contributor | GNU Project, Webmaster
[DFC0 C7F7 9EE6 0CA7 AE55 5E19 6722 43C4 A03F 0EEE]
<brettg <at> gnu.org> <brettg <at> posteo.net>
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38357
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:37:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #25 received at 38357 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Brett Gilio <brettg <at> gnu.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. dec. 24., K, 1:43):
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
> > skribis:
> >
> >> Christopher Howard 写道:
> >>> 22/25 alpha_symmetric_transform FAIL 0.12 s (exit
> >>
> >> I've built master's babl a few times now, the damned thing keeps
> >> succeeding:
> >
> > It failed on berlin:
> >
> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/qzz0qv5llrfb6ls8018yjkwg55lk26yk-babl-0.1.72
> >
> > So the test must be numerically unstable or something.
> >
> > Does upstream have patches or bug reports?
Here is the upstream bug report:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/babl/issues/49
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ludo’.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> This still looks like an on-going issue. I am where Tobias is at, I
> can't reproduce this on my machine which lends me to believe you are
> right, Ludo'.
>
> Interestingly, the store object hashes are matching.
>
> http://berlin.guixsd.org/log/qzz0qv5llrfb6ls8018yjkwg55lk26yk-babl-0.1.72
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> 22/25 alpha_symmetric_transform FAIL 0.17 s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)
> 23/25 types OK 0.12 s
> 24/25 concurrency-stress-test OK 0.37 s
> 25/25 palette-concurrency-stress-test OK 0.62 s
>
> Ok: 24
> Expected Fail: 0
> Fail: 1
> Unexpected Pass: 0
> Skipped: 0
> Timeout: 0
>
>
> The output from the failed tests:
>
> 22/25 alpha_symmetric_transform FAIL 0.17 s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)
>
> --- command ---
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH='/tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/babl' GI_TYPELIB_PATH='/tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/babl' BABL_PATH='/tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/extensions' /tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/tests/alpha_symmetric_transform
> --- stdout ---
>
> --- stderr ---
> ../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
> separate alpha 10.2: 100000.007812500!=100000.000000000(ref)
> ../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
> separate alpha 11.1: 49999.996093750!=50000.000000000(ref)
> ../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
> separate alpha 11.2: 499999.968750000!=500000.000000000(ref)
> ../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
> associatd-alpha 10.2: 100000.007812500!=100000.000000000(ref)
> ../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
> associatd-alpha 11.1: 49999.992187500!=50000.000000000(ref)
> ../babl-0.1.72/babl/babl-internal.h:214 babl_log()
> associatd-alpha 11.2: 499999.937500000!=500000.000000000(ref)
> -------
>
> Full log written to /tmp/guix-build-babl-0.1.72.drv-0/build/meson-logs/testlog.txt
> FAILED: meson-test
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Perhaps we should work around the singular failing test-case and open a
> report upstream to include in a comment?
>
> Wdyt?
>
> --
> Brett M. Gilio
> GNU Guix, Contributor | GNU Project, Webmaster
> [DFC0 C7F7 9EE6 0CA7 AE55 5E19 6722 43C4 A03F 0EEE]
> <brettg <at> gnu.org> <brettg <at> posteo.net>
>
>
>
--
OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38357
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 26 Dec 2019 17:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #28 received at 38357 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> Here is the upstream bug report:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/babl/issues/49
Thanks for finding it! The discussion is still on-going, but it seems
that we could perhaps apply
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/babl/commit/84128d538aa4f189c31d296d04084762ce062107
in the meantime?
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38357
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 26 Dec 2019 17:35:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #31 received at 38357 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. dec. 26., Cs, 18:31):
>
> Hi,
>
> Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > Here is the upstream bug report:
> > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/babl/issues/49
>
> Thanks for finding it! The discussion is still on-going, but it seems
> that we could perhaps apply
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/babl/commit/84128d538aa4f189c31d296d04084762ce062107
> in the meantime?
Looks good to me. I also believe it would be the safest bet for
upstream, but that is another story.
>
> Ludo’.
Regards,
g_bor
--
OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38357
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 07 Jan 2020 11:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #34 received at 38357 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Any update on this? :)
Cheers!
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38357
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 07 Jan 2020 12:11:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #37 received at 38357 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. jan. 7.,
K, 12:40):
>
> Any update on this? :)
The upstream discussion has not been touched for a month.
I believe it would be safe to either
- disable the test, as it doesn't
make any sense at all, it requires a too narrow tolerance.
- or apply the patch with the --no-unsafe-math-optimizations,
possibly by the upstream patch, or by doing a setenv.
The second solution would mean more consistent behaviour across
platforms, sacrificing a bit of performance.
>
> Cheers!
>
> --
> Pierre Neidhardt
> https://ambrevar.xyz/
Best regards,
g_bor
--
OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21
Reply sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 13 Oct 2020 03:38:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Christopher Howard <christopher <at> librehacker.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 13 Oct 2020 03:38:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #42 received at 38357-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
We're now at babl 0.1.78 and this is no longer an issue. It was
resolved upstream [0].
Closing.
Thanks,
Maxim
[0] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/babl/-/issues/49
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:24:08 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 166 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.