Received: (at 38358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2019 12:14:46 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 29 07:14:46 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59656 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iafAc-0007Fj-2l for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 07:14:46 -0500 Received: from mtdac.srv.actiu.net ([91.121.112.95]:35592) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iafAa-0007FY-1w for 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 07:14:44 -0500 Subject: Re: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... To: Ian Kelling <iank@HIDDEN> From: Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <82b44791-6afc-e808-4829-01e4a056090e@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 13:14:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87fti7vnls.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38358 Cc: 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) El 28/11/19 a les 19:53, Ian Kelling ha escrit: > > Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN> writes: > >> El 25/11/19 a les 18:36, Mark H Weaver ha escrit: >>> Hi Narcis, >>> >>> Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> wrote: >>>> El 24/11/19 a les 19:05, Jason Self ha escrit: >>>>> Mailman does add theList-id header, indicating >>>>> >>>>> List-id: GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla.gnu.org> >>>>> >>>>> Which should make it possible for your mail program to do whatever one >>>>> wants with such messages. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I've tried by headers already, and it seems not possible with, for >>>> example, Mozilla Thunderbird (custom header does not work in a filter rule). >>> >>> Are you certain of this? I did a web search found a description of how >>> to filter on custom headers for mail accounts in Thunderbird. I tried >>> it on a friend's instance of Thunderbird. These are the steps I >>> followed: >>> >>> * From the app menu I chose the "Message Filters" menu item, which >>> summoned the Message Filters window. >>> >>> * I clicked the "New..." button, which summoned the Filter Rules window. >>> >>> * I clicked the popup menu of headers to filter on, and down at the >>> bottom of the list I see "Customize...". Choosing it summons the >>> Customize Headers window. I typed "List-id" in the text box and >>> clicked "Add", and then "OK" to dismiss the Customize Headers window. >>> >>> * "List-id" is now an item within the popup menu of headers to filter >>> on. >>> >>> Does this work for you? >> >> No, it doesn't. >> Even worse: replies like yours (not arriving me through list mailer >> because of CC recipient) are impossible to filter with any distinction >> about gnuzilla. >> >> List administrators did become crazy to attend DKIM requirements. If >> DMARC and SPF is used, DKIM doesn't enhance mail at all and list mailers >> can edit subjects and put footers. >> > > Not breaking dkim is the only way we can forward your message and comply > with a strict dmarc policy, well unless you put the gnu lists mail > server into your spf policy. If you use dmarc without dkim (and dont put > us in your spf policy), I consider your server to be misconfigured. > Anyway, many list administrators are getting new policies around DKIM, that will drive mailing lists to death. The new problem is about usability.
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at 38358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2019 18:53:59 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 28 13:53:59 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59129 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iaOvP-0000fx-4H for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:53:59 -0500 Received: from mail.fsf.org ([209.51.188.13]:33279) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <iank@HIDDEN>) id 1iaOvO-0000fp-0i for 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:53:58 -0500 Received: from mail.iankelling.org ([72.14.176.105]:48436) by mail.fsf.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <iank@HIDDEN>) id 1iaOvL-0006CA-Ql; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:53:55 -0500 Received: from iank by mail.iankelling.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <iank@HIDDEN>) id 1iaOvH-0000NA-KY; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:53:51 -0500 References: <e0062443-893d-3e66-36f8-e2863b92c329@HIDDEN> <874kyr26ym.fsf@HIDDEN> <08445696-f26e-a596-8a9a-55ad75e3f95b@HIDDEN> User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50 From: Ian Kelling <iank@HIDDEN> To: Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... In-reply-to: <08445696-f26e-a596-8a9a-55ad75e3f95b@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:53:51 -0500 Message-ID: <87fti7vnls.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by mail.fsf.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38358 Cc: 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN> writes: > El 25/11/19 a les 18:36, Mark H Weaver ha escrit: >> Hi Narcis, >> >> Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> wrote: >>> El 24/11/19 a les 19:05, Jason Self ha escrit: >>>> Mailman does add theList-id header, indicating >>>> >>>> List-id: GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla.gnu.org> >>>> >>>> Which should make it possible for your mail program to do whatever one >>>> wants with such messages. >>>> >>> >>> I've tried by headers already, and it seems not possible with, for >>> example, Mozilla Thunderbird (custom header does not work in a filter rule). >> >> Are you certain of this? I did a web search found a description of how >> to filter on custom headers for mail accounts in Thunderbird. I tried >> it on a friend's instance of Thunderbird. These are the steps I >> followed: >> >> * From the app menu I chose the "Message Filters" menu item, which >> summoned the Message Filters window. >> >> * I clicked the "New..." button, which summoned the Filter Rules window. >> >> * I clicked the popup menu of headers to filter on, and down at the >> bottom of the list I see "Customize...". Choosing it summons the >> Customize Headers window. I typed "List-id" in the text box and >> clicked "Add", and then "OK" to dismiss the Customize Headers window. >> >> * "List-id" is now an item within the popup menu of headers to filter >> on. >> >> Does this work for you? > > No, it doesn't. > Even worse: replies like yours (not arriving me through list mailer > because of CC recipient) are impossible to filter with any distinction > about gnuzilla. > > List administrators did become crazy to attend DKIM requirements. If > DMARC and SPF is used, DKIM doesn't enhance mail at all and list mailers > can edit subjects and put footers. > Not breaking dkim is the only way we can forward your message and comply with a strict dmarc policy, well unless you put the gnu lists mail server into your spf policy. If you use dmarc without dkim (and dont put us in your spf policy), I consider your server to be misconfigured. -- Ian Kelling | Senior Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation GPG Key: B125 F60B 7B28 7FF6 A2B7 DF8F 170A F0E2 9542 95DF https://fsf.org | https://gnu.org
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at 38358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2019 18:51:20 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 28 13:51:20 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59122 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iaOsq-0000c9-AZ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:51:20 -0500 Received: from mail.fsf.org ([209.51.188.13]:33048) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <iank@HIDDEN>) id 1iaOsn-0000c0-RC for 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:51:19 -0500 Received: from mail.iankelling.org ([72.14.176.105]:48276) by mail.fsf.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <iank@HIDDEN>) id 1iaOsl-0005zx-I2; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:51:15 -0500 Received: from iank by mail.iankelling.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <iank@HIDDEN>) id 1iaOsi-000053-3f; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:51:12 -0500 References: <e0062443-893d-3e66-36f8-e2863b92c329@HIDDEN> <1574618740.21117.2.camel@HIDDEN> User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50 From: Ian Kelling <iank@HIDDEN> To: Jason Self <jself@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... In-reply-to: <1574618740.21117.2.camel@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:51:12 -0500 Message-ID: <87h82nvnq7.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by mail.fsf.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38358 Cc: 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) Jason Self <jself@HIDDEN> writes: > On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 11:34 +0100, Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug > reports wrote: >> Please list administrators: >> Add some visible sign to these mails to distinguish that them come >> by bug-gnuzilla. > > Please see > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnuzilla/2019-10/msg00006.html > > Mailman does add theList-id header, indicating > > List-id: GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla.gnu.org> > > Which should make it possible for your mail program to do whatever one > wants with such messages. The linked change was not supposed to happen for debbugs lists, only discussion lists, I'm guessing it did because debbugs got turned off for bug-gnuzilla accidentally for a little while. The reason it wasn't intended for debbugs lists: The motivation for the change is that because of dmarc, we need to rewrite some sender addresses, orr, remove the subject prefix so that dkim will pass. Well, debbugs, puts in a subject prefix, so there is no need to try removing the subject prefix if debbugs is just going to put one there anyways. Anyways, I just looked about 10 other debbugs lists and none of them have mailman [tag] prefixes, so it seems like other lists are getting along fine without it. Anyways, it's up the list administartors (i'm just a site administrator). -- Ian Kelling | Senior Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation GPG Key: B125 F60B 7B28 7FF6 A2B7 DF8F 170A F0E2 9542 95DF https://fsf.org | https://gnu.org
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at 38358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2019 18:31:16 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 28 13:31:16 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59111 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iaOZQ-00009n-8A for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:31:16 -0500 Received: from mail.iankelling.org ([72.14.176.105]:48402) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ian@HIDDEN>) id 1iaOZN-00009e-J0 for 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:31:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iankelling.org; s=li; h=MIME-Version:Date:In-reply-to:Subject:To:From: References; bh=GGSorWzivM7d33AZRecNtpazUSPV6eWefEh+EPJA5WE=; b=ESOt+fE1Hnp/20 nI/qObDn5UHah7WYI+78SK2c/nHtucs7WFF2Ose+RyhqqBQzlpwND0mtX2Ge6vxVenDN4X98VL9we V/55W4OkPhALmiZduY9rufFS9mRHh/7pjMRD6Xuxx2xONjJpd+iQnEg2D7uUIG1oV0UALYsWPMPRU YCMD9Tloc6MD6RAbzHCN44yeF6+ew36/Rju0nkWi4DCFyQU2SI4tpeOGx0V7he0XZwdF2PhGU/qzW dqbLCbH0806PrvEBoKTwj5oqLTKZfpxiNc6YIZ9OQhLPk8gzKZ56pfCpoM4z8eJo9v15dRis9fzJD lAmannyeo+DKA6vQFYeQ==; Received: from iank by mail.iankelling.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ian@HIDDEN>) id 1iaOZK-00057A-Of; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:31:10 -0500 References: <e0062443-893d-3e66-36f8-e2863b92c329@HIDDEN> <874kyr26ym.fsf@HIDDEN> <08445696-f26e-a596-8a9a-55ad75e3f95b@HIDDEN> User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50 From: Ian Kelling <ian@HIDDEN> To: Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... In-reply-to: <08445696-f26e-a596-8a9a-55ad75e3f95b@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:31:10 -0500 Message-ID: <87imn3vonl.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38358 Cc: 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN> writes: > El 25/11/19 a les 18:36, Mark H Weaver ha escrit: >> Hi Narcis, >> >> Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> wrote: >>> El 24/11/19 a les 19:05, Jason Self ha escrit: >>>> Mailman does add theList-id header, indicating >>>> >>>> List-id: GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla.gnu.org> >>>> >>>> Which should make it possible for your mail program to do whatever one >>>> wants with such messages. >>>> >>> >>> I've tried by headers already, and it seems not possible with, for >>> example, Mozilla Thunderbird (custom header does not work in a filter rule). >> >> Are you certain of this? I did a web search found a description of how >> to filter on custom headers for mail accounts in Thunderbird. I tried >> it on a friend's instance of Thunderbird. These are the steps I >> followed: >> >> * From the app menu I chose the "Message Filters" menu item, which >> summoned the Message Filters window. >> >> * I clicked the "New..." button, which summoned the Filter Rules window. >> >> * I clicked the popup menu of headers to filter on, and down at the >> bottom of the list I see "Customize...". Choosing it summons the >> Customize Headers window. I typed "List-id" in the text box and >> clicked "Add", and then "OK" to dismiss the Customize Headers window. >> >> * "List-id" is now an item within the popup menu of headers to filter >> on. >> >> Does this work for you? > > No, it doesn't. > Even worse: replies like yours (not arriving me through list mailer > because of CC recipient) are impossible to filter with any distinction > about gnuzilla. The list actually avoids sending you email when someone does a reply all. Those are sent directly from the person who did a reply all. There are a few ways to deal with this. Here is one: If you log in to the gnu mailman interface at lists.gnu.org/bug-gnuzilla, and change you person options to turn off the "nodup" feature, then when someone does a reply-all, the list will continue to send you an email. Then you will always get a an email with the list-id header. Then, you can configure your email client to discard the duplicate that is from @debbugs.gnu.org but does not have any list-id header. > > List administrators did become crazy to attend DKIM requirements. If > DMARC and SPF is used, DKIM doesn't enhance mail at all and list mailers > can edit subjects and put footers. > > Best regards.
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2019 08:13:58 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 26 03:13:58 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50161 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZVyw-0002cn-03 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 03:13:58 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:54928) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iZVyt-0002cf-Ld for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 03:13:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43723) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iZVys-0001VL-EB for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 03:13:55 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iZVjn-00051c-0p for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 02:58:20 -0500 Received: from mtdac.srv.actiu.net ([91.121.112.95]:38290) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iZVjm-00051H-Qq for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 02:58:18 -0500 Subject: Re: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... To: bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN From: Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <0d1107b4-61b7-b8c0-ee7a-3932abb259fd@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:55:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87zhgjzr5t.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 91.121.112.95 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) El 25/11/19 a les 20:33, Mark H Weaver ha escrit: > Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN> wrote: > >> El 25/11/19 a les 18:36, Mark H Weaver ha escrit: >>> * I clicked the popup menu of headers to filter on, and down at the >>> bottom of the list I see "Customize...". Choosing it summons the >>> Customize Headers window. I typed "List-id" in the text box and >>> clicked "Add", and then "OK" to dismiss the Customize Headers window. >>> >>> * "List-id" is now an item within the popup menu of headers to filter >>> on. >>> >>> Does this work for you? >> >> No, it doesn't. > > Well, that might be a bug in Thunderbird, unless you made a mistake. > Did you include ":" in the custom header name? It should _not_ be > included. > > I'm sorry, but I'm reluctant to change every Subject header on this > mailing list in order to work around a bug in your mail program. Among > other things, inserting "[bug-gnuzilla] " in addition to "bug#xxxxx: " > would leave very little space in the subject header to describe what's > being discussed. I often find it difficult to fit the relevant > information within a subject header as it is. [gnuz] >> Even worse: replies like yours (not arriving me through list mailer >> because of CC recipient) are impossible to filter with any distinction >> about gnuzilla. > > Well, that's entirely my fault. The mailing list had rewritten your > From header to be "Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports > <bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN>", and I manually replaced it with your actual > email address. I won't do that again. > >> List administrators did become crazy to attend DKIM requirements. If >> DMARC and SPF is used, DKIM doesn't enhance mail at all and list mailers >> can edit subjects and put footers. > > It's been a while since I looked at this, and I've likely forgotten some > important details, but it seems to me that we had little choice in the > matter. > > The fact is, some prominent GNU developers use DMARC and DKIM for their > personal domains, and some of them feel strongly about it. Before the > recent changes to GNU mailing lists, when these developers would send > mail to a GNU mailing list, the changes made to their emails by mailman > would break the DKIM signatures, and many recipients subscribed to the > mailing list would reject the emails as spam. This had the effect of > causing mail delivery to those recipients to be disabled, and moreover > harmed the reputation of GNU.org as a mail sender. That's how I > remember it, anyway. > > It would be one thing if DMARC or DKIM violated some important ethical > considerations that made them worth launching a campaign to fight > against, but as far as I can see they are reasonable approaches to > reduce spam, and in a way that doesn't require very sophisticated > heuristic filtering. I think that's a good thing, because it makes it > much more practical to run an independent mail server. > > What do you think? Practical to run should include Practical to use, and this new policy around is moving most people to web forums (with labeled subjects, status indicators, context, footers and help...). Structured mind is better represented in a structured and signaled conversation. Chaotic mind is better deployed in a chat thread. (sorry for my bad english)
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at 38358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 19:35:15 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 14:35:15 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49710 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZK8g-0007ut-Oe for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:35:15 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:45142) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1iZK8e-0007ue-NO for 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:35:13 -0500 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1iZK8c-0007FQ-F6; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:35:10 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> To: Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... In-Reply-To: <08445696-f26e-a596-8a9a-55ad75e3f95b@HIDDEN> References: <08445696-f26e-a596-8a9a-55ad75e3f95b@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:33:55 -0500 Message-ID: <87zhgjzr5t.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38358 Cc: 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN> wrote: > El 25/11/19 a les 18:36, Mark H Weaver ha escrit: >> * I clicked the popup menu of headers to filter on, and down at the >> bottom of the list I see "Customize...". Choosing it summons the >> Customize Headers window. I typed "List-id" in the text box and >> clicked "Add", and then "OK" to dismiss the Customize Headers window. >> >> * "List-id" is now an item within the popup menu of headers to filter >> on. >> >> Does this work for you? > > No, it doesn't. Well, that might be a bug in Thunderbird, unless you made a mistake. Did you include ":" in the custom header name? It should _not_ be included. I'm sorry, but I'm reluctant to change every Subject header on this mailing list in order to work around a bug in your mail program. Among other things, inserting "[bug-gnuzilla] " in addition to "bug#xxxxx: " would leave very little space in the subject header to describe what's being discussed. I often find it difficult to fit the relevant information within a subject header as it is. > Even worse: replies like yours (not arriving me through list mailer > because of CC recipient) are impossible to filter with any distinction > about gnuzilla. Well, that's entirely my fault. The mailing list had rewritten your From header to be "Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN>", and I manually replaced it with your actual email address. I won't do that again. > List administrators did become crazy to attend DKIM requirements. If > DMARC and SPF is used, DKIM doesn't enhance mail at all and list mailers > can edit subjects and put footers. It's been a while since I looked at this, and I've likely forgotten some important details, but it seems to me that we had little choice in the matter. The fact is, some prominent GNU developers use DMARC and DKIM for their personal domains, and some of them feel strongly about it. Before the recent changes to GNU mailing lists, when these developers would send mail to a GNU mailing list, the changes made to their emails by mailman would break the DKIM signatures, and many recipients subscribed to the mailing list would reject the emails as spam. This had the effect of causing mail delivery to those recipients to be disabled, and moreover harmed the reputation of GNU.org as a mail sender. That's how I remember it, anyway. It would be one thing if DMARC or DKIM violated some important ethical considerations that made them worth launching a campaign to fight against, but as far as I can see they are reasonable approaches to reduce spam, and in a way that doesn't require very sophisticated heuristic filtering. I think that's a good thing, because it makes it much more practical to run an independent mail server. What do you think? Regards, Mark
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 19:35:27 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 14:35:27 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49713 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZK8t-0007vN-20 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:35:27 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45675) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1iZK8r-0007vG-B9 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:35:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1iZK8q-00039d-1z for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:35:25 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1iZK8o-0002qC-Re for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:35:23 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:51282) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1iZK8o-0002jh-Nf for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:35:22 -0500 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1iZK8c-0007FQ-F6; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:35:10 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> To: Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... In-Reply-To: <08445696-f26e-a596-8a9a-55ad75e3f95b@HIDDEN> References: <08445696-f26e-a596-8a9a-55ad75e3f95b@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:33:55 -0500 Message-ID: <87zhgjzr5t.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.112.178.59 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN> wrote: > El 25/11/19 a les 18:36, Mark H Weaver ha escrit: >> * I clicked the popup menu of headers to filter on, and down at the >> bottom of the list I see "Customize...". Choosing it summons the >> Customize Headers window. I typed "List-id" in the text box and >> clicked "Add", and then "OK" to dismiss the Customize Headers window. >> >> * "List-id" is now an item within the popup menu of headers to filter >> on. >> >> Does this work for you? > > No, it doesn't. Well, that might be a bug in Thunderbird, unless you made a mistake. Did you include ":" in the custom header name? It should _not_ be included. I'm sorry, but I'm reluctant to change every Subject header on this mailing list in order to work around a bug in your mail program. Among other things, inserting "[bug-gnuzilla] " in addition to "bug#xxxxx: " would leave very little space in the subject header to describe what's being discussed. I often find it difficult to fit the relevant information within a subject header as it is. > Even worse: replies like yours (not arriving me through list mailer > because of CC recipient) are impossible to filter with any distinction > about gnuzilla. Well, that's entirely my fault. The mailing list had rewritten your From header to be "Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN>", and I manually replaced it with your actual email address. I won't do that again. > List administrators did become crazy to attend DKIM requirements. If > DMARC and SPF is used, DKIM doesn't enhance mail at all and list mailers > can edit subjects and put footers. It's been a while since I looked at this, and I've likely forgotten some important details, but it seems to me that we had little choice in the matter. The fact is, some prominent GNU developers use DMARC and DKIM for their personal domains, and some of them feel strongly about it. Before the recent changes to GNU mailing lists, when these developers would send mail to a GNU mailing list, the changes made to their emails by mailman would break the DKIM signatures, and many recipients subscribed to the mailing list would reject the emails as spam. This had the effect of causing mail delivery to those recipients to be disabled, and moreover harmed the reputation of GNU.org as a mail sender. That's how I remember it, anyway. It would be one thing if DMARC or DKIM violated some important ethical considerations that made them worth launching a campaign to fight against, but as far as I can see they are reasonable approaches to reduce spam, and in a way that doesn't require very sophisticated heuristic filtering. I think that's a good thing, because it makes it much more practical to run an independent mail server. What do you think? Regards, Mark
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at 38358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 18:30:20 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 13:30:20 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49668 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZJ7s-0006Dm-22 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:30:20 -0500 Received: from mtdac.srv.actiu.net ([91.121.112.95]:50290) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iZJ7q-0006Dd-B9 for 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:30:19 -0500 Subject: Re: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> From: Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <08445696-f26e-a596-8a9a-55ad75e3f95b@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:30:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <874kyr26ym.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38358 Cc: 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) El 25/11/19 a les 18:36, Mark H Weaver ha escrit: > Hi Narcis, > > Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> wrote: >> El 24/11/19 a les 19:05, Jason Self ha escrit: >>> Mailman does add theĀ List-id header, indicatingĀ >>> >>> List-id: GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla.gnu.org> >>> >>> Which should make it possible for your mail program to do whatever one >>> wants with such messages. >>> >> >> I've tried by headers already, and it seems not possible with, for >> example, Mozilla Thunderbird (custom header does not work in a filter rule). > > Are you certain of this? I did a web search found a description of how > to filter on custom headers for mail accounts in Thunderbird. I tried > it on a friend's instance of Thunderbird. These are the steps I > followed: > > * From the app menu I chose the "Message Filters" menu item, which > summoned the Message Filters window. > > * I clicked the "New..." button, which summoned the Filter Rules window. > > * I clicked the popup menu of headers to filter on, and down at the > bottom of the list I see "Customize...". Choosing it summons the > Customize Headers window. I typed "List-id" in the text box and > clicked "Add", and then "OK" to dismiss the Customize Headers window. > > * "List-id" is now an item within the popup menu of headers to filter > on. > > Does this work for you? No, it doesn't. Even worse: replies like yours (not arriving me through list mailer because of CC recipient) are impossible to filter with any distinction about gnuzilla. List administrators did become crazy to attend DKIM requirements. If DMARC and SPF is used, DKIM doesn't enhance mail at all and list mailers can edit subjects and put footers. Best regards.
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at 38358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 17:37:58 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 12:37:58 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49645 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZIJC-0004rS-B5 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:37:58 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:42852) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1iZIJA-0004rJ-Cj for 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:37:56 -0500 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1iZIJ8-00065b-3f; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:37:54 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> To: Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... In-Reply-To: <fda6a131-352f-aad1-866a-4ace73089516@HIDDEN> References: <e0062443-893d-3e66-36f8-e2863b92c329@HIDDEN> <fda6a131-352f-aad1-866a-4ace73089516@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:36:38 -0500 Message-ID: <874kyr26ym.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38358 Cc: 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Narcis, Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> wrote: > El 24/11/19 a les 19:05, Jason Self ha escrit: >> Mailman does add the=C2=A0List-id header, indicating=C2=A0 >> >> List-id: GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla.gnu.org> >> >> Which should make it possible for your mail program to do whatever one >> wants with such messages. >> > > I've tried by headers already, and it seems not possible with, for > example, Mozilla Thunderbird (custom header does not work in a filter rul= e). Are you certain of this? I did a web search found a description of how to filter on custom headers for mail accounts in Thunderbird. I tried it on a friend's instance of Thunderbird. These are the steps I followed: * From the app menu I chose the "Message Filters" menu item, which summoned the Message Filters window. * I clicked the "New..." button, which summoned the Filter Rules window. * I clicked the popup menu of headers to filter on, and down at the bottom of the list I see "Customize...". Choosing it summons the Customize Headers window. I typed "List-id" in the text box and clicked "Add", and then "OK" to dismiss the Customize Headers window. * "List-id" is now an item within the popup menu of headers to filter on. Does this work for you? Thanks, Mark
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at 38358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 15:29:20 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 10:29:20 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49551 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZGIh-0001RN-UN for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:29:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51245) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <jself@HIDDEN>) id 1iZGIa-0001QJ-Me for 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:29:12 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <jself@HIDDEN>) id 1iYwGU-0002KX-PO; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 13:05:42 -0500 Received: from 96-66-250-146-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([96.66.250.146]:35206 helo=pc.lan) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <jself@HIDDEN>) id 1iYwGU-0001lR-9u; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 13:05:42 -0500 Message-ID: <1574618740.21117.2.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... From: Jason Self <jself@HIDDEN> To: bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 10:05:40 -0800 In-Reply-To: <e0062443-893d-3e66-36f8-e2863b92c329@HIDDEN> References: <e0062443-893d-3e66-36f8-e2863b92c329@HIDDEN> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-OK5UUnAl/mP2NXCasrtf" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38358 Cc: 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-OK5UUnAl/mP2NXCasrtf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 11:34 +0100, Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports wrote: > Please list administrators: > Add some visible sign to these mails to distinguish that them come > by bug-gnuzilla. Please see=C2=A0 https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnuzilla/2019-10/msg00006.html Mailman does add the=C2=A0List-id header, indicating=C2=A0 List-id: GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla.gnu.org> Which should make it possible for your mail program to do whatever one wants with such messages. --=-OK5UUnAl/mP2NXCasrtf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABCgAGBQJd2sZ0AAoJEJ0NsxtUWjGYgX4P/j7efnAatbk9RfUw1t+h0yRH MRvppvE/TKSkzryZG6c8NomqXVKBeNbYRlS4tSK6LKA5V48MDvi+H5gF1vihrtNf ba8B+dh/0MBwM2RUjFGHq+Kkgh47IPd97BaQvaVGTWKj5TpjZ5bs7SpnwNpDEZhc gWTPrfdxA+1CLIy3e5ruvJ8jhfgqF+TADCqwtqDr+J7NbS6ctZBtRCuesW6e/Kst nu4CZ//BgxmMFSNhP5LK3lnbvVbgubC1HrJuoLH+o4cxPHkUKXoDJN3jnTV8Cvsd 7f9/aaC0SGSVGi8DY+LUJt2TkH7RxHYdMlkVBa1pz5GSw1GxmF5UHHMg4MvmSE5W Vzfg+I5PTPccTddBGYwDhkPTp9nBuRyNbkCZgGbMG7EfP1R9lHzV3C0SrAxlUMIw hojHDY2zLZvJB9fhppnQ4Qx6O0jC5p54tJu9aGtWrrA2XkUCrm1LYYW7YY5dsM5T 0eVXLqklT3RMAfPWBj8w11TYG6C2RlRCN3h6SynSdFd+2Gm1waVGOpiW3t0gPivg YAnDB8WHoSg+1kxDI+75usi6tCQE4t7IRZ5jyOeQUNMZYp8nlYoJwP2JrtW6B2cr a3j4nHWzLDhwjd6o6w2gndDf7m4JwXXkH2dYMr/MjgnjqcdpPQ4wz0T78+Bd/0Fc mzHEfiAqY/BKjWmPE3Ea =S9/f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-OK5UUnAl/mP2NXCasrtf--
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at 38358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 15:02:52 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 10:02:52 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49510 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZFt6-0000jt-1N for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:02:52 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:34925) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <michael.albinus@HIDDEN>) id 1iZFsw-0000jT-Pc for 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:02:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1574694156; bh=aUcWQjgoG1FQAZPszyTVhgqbJemQT5cNPQmLYY6VIyA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=NrstYAlk/P5YH6R3iZFMQcdxreyyPpqsjivx3L+D8jEQeDYHcZQT5/w2kFSYAo5oi c/GlHAD3WcloWKl2bIqBpo2YRX3MDhSSRytpyQAT/PpWluFCJzCz/J3WNUCKrUjVlU zUyzh5DEK6B25KH3P6F2q8nvfHkxuXS0vpCgH8+0= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([213.220.159.61]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MVvL5-1iRAlS3wEn-00Rp0q; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:02:36 +0100 From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@HIDDEN> To: Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... References: <e0062443-893d-3e66-36f8-e2863b92c329@HIDDEN> <d3dc47ca-bc80-32cc-4122-49e2ac9905ca@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:02:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <d3dc47ca-bc80-32cc-4122-49e2ac9905ca@HIDDEN> (Narcis Garcia's message of "Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:40:26 +0100") Message-ID: <87h82s6ltg.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:31h1JYXvJZUSNkyD1Q2mPwf/TvMivDKN2SPkfRaqlJMp2OZP7BN x5frfbpZ2RSY/GdVpzrUlV8/XPxEH7G8J2/3HQAa246hcA9xfG8YJc5BDjMB+TTJCGgdgYz aCtTCaivHP3Baeav+bCZzrhgtvQlKEMAHPbZda8G3FzSeUxsi/QHUpftdI2wrlpnutYftfD nkVl5PsyMbYQ64uBy7xsQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:TolL1TtBFvk=:82BZKEHf7Xllm/EZpPu4Xi qo0g+sEeeFaNohj1LtUIAb+8VYs05xqWM5CGg4M5exyXMsSQLDwKsQpz+RSGfJEHmc3OSh03K Kefup+LXtHZPQJB8ic0rUm7mcqY2NfZ2UGkMbmk4NWVKBmLNHw5IeANbspe9qjlrfB3C94aQT UOtWFl3j4jq63knIgg6Ug97llJY9CnkXgnbAfvgC5psrr69q60jDLZIpD/2J1L7xVl7fg+6qt 0r9m6btP3qciify594BYu0nZLmsmFHQO232rZqnwyHS4optqqp+yHmwajKk0ba9/y9E/+DbBR W4gOCyH/hAIHe3SswTtbytjD0sb6kaVxvX96UdpM22cq1cOUmm6oK3w1qM9Af4WIkpFyHw4Gy /DZaGnWKbY0iv5C0L7WWGm70otRiNDiEmTw0e+cNIrB/70tU2jwSy0kImerdzw6R1s3hGwaof TNf2Loi1BDgNPHYh2/mUqtABSelt0yRFFiwbG8CYWBKEj4wg/gmcRaO1tYOiFqzlxn7BE43oy NbEgzZxV3Ej8L3EXHC1ba1mdFSHDCzq5xdxmnWmsFq4QeaVk9X/ro+cWRgG8L6Pw0U63C3pKQ 6FJE4qa72/8w+rSEawpNv3Dpiqu+ra/vX4Ua8qAW+BML3HsEopjxavqadb8bP+qfbT68j1Tqw kTzVrr+evk0v38IHJjFBWx82gigWGRR2zleQJk7tm4AJ22AjhgbSSCx/LvO4VOiWKYVfFxfqw U7j6/HjWm5l8mg5DitqYqpyBLMtpncBSRuAUa8z8cf9P+rpF1ihZzaFfWgkwAPIFFLSUtXb/f Gp/UjYmmP4XZBseRWcRf8U2z23apgPUhKliGw7SfUZ3MmzWcOQxq9/zVjMtYSbVuog18gKQDk iSp2f1cUd+EW3GwFJWIwMb2fgFX8qdrD8aO59oTdHOK4T0Prf9y1OSySp/fgcWfcE8bCRdkCx E0eEoAWW4fn/HJAxCKl0f1VcZu0SK7eqfk3EdnRcNSTPkdm/uVsCkMEAmaKa+KOpdXk7pqywj EKaooCbQFENsWAJr4frXPSlgZqFLriRjs2yl3X/tiDqm/9pJ9ro+/bg9EUldXZoo/mONrO3C8 SSZq/sqrI52r93jiCI47kJUezRBXXCDf0VqlPzmtUxGpzSeNUxp1FmDy8t5v1w3WCViBd/rVr DOtnNFoNVVmPY6y+QROTmEBSvqHbbGR3vgMisiwT1jZTtHLELoF3A9uND8UY8NRwCzlPOQOVq nmOwfaWB7NP089ulu0v82nP+lTEHlbdiJ0EiAbVkd2OmKT5E3vOpNk6YjMvc= X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38358 Cc: 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> writes: Hi, [pls keep me in Cc, I'm not subscribed to the bug-gnuzilla ML] > I was responding to another bug report letter, not created by me. > I just pressed to [Reply list] for a report by Chris Marusich, and > adapted subject title. > Something like a static "gnuzilla" or "icecat" would suffice my request. > I can't create one mail filter for each bug number, and > "debbugs.gnu.org" also cover other scopes. Well, the subject template for emails is fixed for all bugs going through debbugs.gnu.org. I fear we cannot change it w/o disturbing all other projects hosting their bug database on debbugs.gnu.org. > + Where is a mail footer to know where and how are published my > replies?! I want to check if my mail address is marked enough in internet. Hmm, I'm not aware of such a feature on the debbugs server. Maybe your ML configuration allows such a footer, don't know. Best regards, Michael.
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 14:40:42 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 09:40:42 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48015 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZFXe-0008Dv-Gb for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:40:42 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:54442) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iZFXb-0008Dm-AL for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:40:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52915) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iZFXZ-0007Ew-13 for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:40:39 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iZFXV-0006Ct-9l for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:40:34 -0500 Received: from mtdac.srv.actiu.net ([91.121.112.95]:53374) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iZFXV-0006CI-3X for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:40:33 -0500 Subject: Re: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... To: Icecat list <bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN> From: Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <d3dc47ca-bc80-32cc-4122-49e2ac9905ca@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:40:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87y2w46nf7.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 91.121.112.95 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) El 25/11/19 a les 15:27, Michael Albinus ha escrit: > Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> writes: >=20 > Hi, >=20 >>>> Add some visible sign to these mails to distinguish that them come >>>> by bug-gnuzilla. >>> >>> Please see=C2=A0 >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnuzilla/2019-10/msg00006.html >>> >>> Mailman does add the=C2=A0List-id header, indicating=C2=A0 >>> >>> List-id: GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla.gnu.org> >>> >>> Which should make it possible for your mail program to do whatever on= e >>> wants with such messages. >>> >> >> I've tried by headers already, and it seems not possible with, for >> example, Mozilla Thunderbird (custom header does not work in a filter = rule). >> >> Please list administrators: >> Add some VISIBLE sign to these mails to distinguish that them come >> by bug-gnuzilla. >> 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org as recipient is not a true recipient and it's a >> problem to realize WHY am I receiving some concrete letter. >=20 > I cannot speak for the bug-gnuzilla ML. But your bug reports pass the > debbugs.gnu.org server, which adds the bug number "bug#38358". This > subject prefix shall suffice your request. >=20 > Best regards, Michael. >=20 I was responding to another bug report letter, not created by me. I just pressed to [Reply list] for a report by Chris Marusich, and adapted subject title. Something like a static "gnuzilla" or "icecat" would suffice my request. I can't create one mail filter for each bug number, and "debbugs.gnu.org" also cover other scopes. + Where is a mail footer to know where and how are published my replies?! I want to check if my mail address is marked enough in internet= .
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at 38358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 14:28:06 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 09:28:06 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48011 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZFLS-0007tx-8X for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:28:06 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:35093) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <michael.albinus@HIDDEN>) id 1iZFLQ-0007te-IO for 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:28:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1574692077; bh=4YBX/UA5umK0FQ5nf4yDaOLVBykO5/dWccdIJdGJ0js=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=kFEeisM3qQD783OQVtFBe4Z4B1XIGp1Jtk3qE1OcDe7DoA35b/YKBOmAHbrlP0xtw sHLJYVE6i0vGsjb+OVxVsw3i7L8IUI1u7qnxttKgQMM1t42ABgsGBXCH9XFQUaeapw ADoIMoyNYKqZ/w7ef2FILgLhNbhCSuLaluPJRMQw= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([213.220.159.61]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M72oB-1iSwkc12o3-008csj; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:27:57 +0100 From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@HIDDEN> To: Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... References: <e0062443-893d-3e66-36f8-e2863b92c329@HIDDEN> <fda6a131-352f-aad1-866a-4ace73089516@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:27:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <fda6a131-352f-aad1-866a-4ace73089516@HIDDEN> (Narcis Garcia's message of "Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:28:08 +0100") Message-ID: <87y2w46nf7.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:uCdbZ8AK5wicfeeBuVz4qRyzLRFAgwS9m2p20T6JIu2nEZ2wc2x 8YhUjYvjWiIQbrD2EReqnwAvz068RMXgGWwVeTrQgazUrqFvvGDhlI5DLAF+d4mfgo7kwqz g9wfq+Qla2wardsCTleCJVyksG6SuAoHE9Ige9D7UgKjsA14+vN4jzsO/gZOdXKriWR4dGD P1u7czbnkwmntWdL56Puw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:x8ViK+shrd0=:oHTcdFIfKpkRPFUBLMmc2U C8QetsX7xueT7bV1mrKX+Uh22QNLJm55a6/56jQZYLdIhuejaXPnpeDlCCHqkODLGCL52KM25 YgafmbcH3JaebM8BhnCWChSD7+pVRSoYANeI/JWev3iyXG4DYv+YRDorBPZitdGfr3uQHG8k5 ojzp13Ijfh0klnLWkk5vrWQpkduXMzd1wxvpOJ95xEOpXlMhXXjnD5wGYGvZM6vQKhy/ZikwD 9Zsacluno/9qfvpr3db6SEZx+aL8y9BXTjaQ9QI47zswkaC/AXCFQ0bWv4oa923Q+IAXA8tMT 8E+fA6KlvUXn3A0Ik6pVVykQbYpnQhJPNHPLvNbV6cPqmKpDR2Sr6k1XmmR3CyWdi5J9pxa3C 0pydJgfVUAoyKIxEWDDM2zUCezP3HxQlQSz5BR5z22xUd3EuJfVOK2o6XVoOEA0PrU7cLRUgK T08JbM4xttn/MdVX2xppU7DROF1/Rp8LZ7hPLrFm5nqtUv7/3wqK1GIxYYAmI9hnOCR10dbJz X6Z8bPdbE5LQfIjdOi3ik5BncLLb7+8S05hcXVx1v2XxCLk5/pwUt4d/cb1ahdj8zCmXc8MYQ rl8PhKyT6xkFVqbyQKgbJM8VJL+o1BgjVEI2uffE3wQRtMdjbOimrB2FhYvaFVMaI7F+qzYXy xnW37pJXMWKZH0KNENpFad90rGlIul/rRLAjL8Uwt5nBAUNOGpouLU+35yl9pBni04brlkVC3 lD48BRa1e9YNbHT6G8gyGaFoZDtqdnRM4Om/ZvMKpU6eJrVWELJGN+5+7dendnK1Xi0L0wuMu rVI+o5ikc0O3dqkHe5GuJpHonq6cvUZTuLn+9wcN6qichKHGxuM3U/OfbLL5LI6E04Vs0PaIh tqlfBOBxHU0HcYFnv8MADVETi+SMYyrGZrKfaXxLtcs6HoJ+c8K4ceBlKINUDDRau+rMBmfr9 aUAn6m4JFXE6G7EePOoQGv7kVeWQeXWFxcvvo/Lqi21dj3k0uwgYALvsfXEdfvklw+3UVczEu S/H4Yd9Tcr5IPZdNDbvzOMD44e5MwlYAvD6aQQbiKrMCzvF0Arw0yU3vP+QAr22rkUu/tj1IA wHcwPNnFQJzlS6QALpStP6caXaxx+icpkID1eSbGyK6wBj9qD8Rr+jIMhK+3s+gTHZeqafPbQ 9leEHkg6p6FuPjX3Vxp+iSNOdh/mVgUk97orHW5CwElU/TwMjgQ0CFfwJOzfoXQWA9GOkIf4T DqrN+Cu3zbiff5le+SRCiaWUtCA2aIpDK3tiO/LK/Y8ExyiTMIyl+NflwNz8= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38358 Cc: 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> writes: Hi, >>> Add some visible sign to these mails to distinguish that them come >>> by bug-gnuzilla. >>=20 >> Please see=C2=A0 >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnuzilla/2019-10/msg00006.html >>=20 >> Mailman does add the=C2=A0List-id header, indicating=C2=A0 >>=20 >> List-id: GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla.gnu.org> >>=20 >> Which should make it possible for your mail program to do whatever one >> wants with such messages. >>=20 > > I've tried by headers already, and it seems not possible with, for > example, Mozilla Thunderbird (custom header does not work in a filter rul= e). > > Please list administrators: > Add some VISIBLE sign to these mails to distinguish that them come > by bug-gnuzilla. > 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org as recipient is not a true recipient and it's a > problem to realize WHY am I receiving some concrete letter. I cannot speak for the bug-gnuzilla ML. But your bug reports pass the debbugs.gnu.org server, which adds the bug number "bug#38358". This subject prefix shall suffice your request. Best regards, Michael.
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 13:28:25 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 08:28:25 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47942 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZEPh-0006LL-2A for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:28:25 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46442) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iZEPe-0006LD-KG for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:28:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iZEPc-0004rE-Bx for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:28:22 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iZEPZ-0003Y6-1z for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:28:18 -0500 Received: from mtdac.srv.actiu.net ([91.121.112.95]:52436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iZEPY-0003XW-SG for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:28:17 -0500 Subject: Re: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... To: bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN From: Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <fda6a131-352f-aad1-866a-4ace73089516@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:28:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1574618740.21117.2.camel@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 91.121.112.95 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) El 24/11/19 a les 19:05, Jason Self ha escrit: > On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 11:34 +0100, Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug > reports wrote: >> Please list administrators: >> Add some visible sign to these mails to distinguish that them come >> by bug-gnuzilla. >=20 > Please see=C2=A0 > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnuzilla/2019-10/msg00006.html >=20 > Mailman does add the=C2=A0List-id header, indicating=C2=A0 >=20 > List-id: GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla.gnu.org> >=20 > Which should make it possible for your mail program to do whatever one > wants with such messages. >=20 I've tried by headers already, and it seems not possible with, for example, Mozilla Thunderbird (custom header does not work in a filter rul= e). Please list administrators: Add some VISIBLE sign to these mails to distinguish that them come by bug-gnuzilla. 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org as recipient is not a true recipient and it's a problem to realize WHY am I receiving some concrete letter.
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2019 12:58:09 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 07:58:09 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47860 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iZDwP-0005Xw-A4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:58:09 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49370) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <jself@HIDDEN>) id 1iZDqb-0005JQ-FM for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:52:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56269) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <jself@HIDDEN>) id 1iYwGU-0006xk-Ud for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 13:05:44 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <jself@HIDDEN>) id 1iYwGU-0002KX-PO; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 13:05:42 -0500 Received: from 96-66-250-146-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([96.66.250.146]:35206 helo=pc.lan) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <jself@HIDDEN>) id 1iYwGU-0001lR-9u; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 13:05:42 -0500 Message-ID: <1574618740.21117.2.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#38358: Subject prefix, true recipient... From: Jason Self <jself@HIDDEN> To: bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 10:05:40 -0800 In-Reply-To: <e0062443-893d-3e66-36f8-e2863b92c329@HIDDEN> References: <e0062443-893d-3e66-36f8-e2863b92c329@HIDDEN> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-OK5UUnAl/mP2NXCasrtf" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 38358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-OK5UUnAl/mP2NXCasrtf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 11:34 +0100, Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports wrote: > Please list administrators: > Add some visible sign to these mails to distinguish that them come > by bug-gnuzilla. Please see=C2=A0 https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnuzilla/2019-10/msg00006.html Mailman does add the=C2=A0List-id header, indicating=C2=A0 List-id: GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla.gnu.org> Which should make it possible for your mail program to do whatever one wants with such messages. --=-OK5UUnAl/mP2NXCasrtf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABCgAGBQJd2sZ0AAoJEJ0NsxtUWjGYgX4P/j7efnAatbk9RfUw1t+h0yRH MRvppvE/TKSkzryZG6c8NomqXVKBeNbYRlS4tSK6LKA5V48MDvi+H5gF1vihrtNf ba8B+dh/0MBwM2RUjFGHq+Kkgh47IPd97BaQvaVGTWKj5TpjZ5bs7SpnwNpDEZhc gWTPrfdxA+1CLIy3e5ruvJ8jhfgqF+TADCqwtqDr+J7NbS6ctZBtRCuesW6e/Kst nu4CZ//BgxmMFSNhP5LK3lnbvVbgubC1HrJuoLH+o4cxPHkUKXoDJN3jnTV8Cvsd 7f9/aaC0SGSVGi8DY+LUJt2TkH7RxHYdMlkVBa1pz5GSw1GxmF5UHHMg4MvmSE5W Vzfg+I5PTPccTddBGYwDhkPTp9nBuRyNbkCZgGbMG7EfP1R9lHzV3C0SrAxlUMIw hojHDY2zLZvJB9fhppnQ4Qx6O0jC5p54tJu9aGtWrrA2XkUCrm1LYYW7YY5dsM5T 0eVXLqklT3RMAfPWBj8w11TYG6C2RlRCN3h6SynSdFd+2Gm1waVGOpiW3t0gPivg YAnDB8WHoSg+1kxDI+75usi6tCQE4t7IRZ5jyOeQUNMZYp8nlYoJwP2JrtW6B2cr a3j4nHWzLDhwjd6o6w2gndDf7m4JwXXkH2dYMr/MjgnjqcdpPQ4wz0T78+Bd/0Fc mzHEfiAqY/BKjWmPE3Ea =S9/f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-OK5UUnAl/mP2NXCasrtf--
bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2019 10:46:21 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 24 05:46:15 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58102 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iYpOT-0001Fs-V2 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 05:45:35 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43440) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iYpE3-00010E-Ru for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 05:37:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iYpE2-00037R-MK for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 05:34:43 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iYpDz-00021j-ES for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 05:34:40 -0500 Received: from mtdac.srv.actiu.net ([91.121.112.95]:60534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <informatica@HIDDEN>) id 1iYpDz-0001p1-70 for bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 05:34:39 -0500 Subject: Subject prefix, true recipient... To: Icecat list <bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN> From: Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN> Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <e0062443-893d-3e66-36f8-e2863b92c329@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 11:34:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1911231102550.11560@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 91.121.112.95 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Please list administrators: Add some visible sign to these mails to distinguish that them come by bug-gnuzilla. El 23/11/19 a les 17:10, Jack Hill ha escrit: > On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, Chris Marusich wrote: >=20 >> Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@HIDDEN> writes: >> I have successfully built IceCat using the Guix preview source (guix >> build -S icecat) on a foreign GNU/Linux distro.=C2=A0 Things I noticed= : >> >> - When IceCat 68 is built from source on this foreign distro (without >> =C2=A0using any software from Guix to do the build), the built IceCat = 68 >> =C2=A0works.=C2=A0 The "Unknown U2F Error" does not occur.=C2=A0 This = means that the >> =C2=A0system is configured correctly to allow me to use my security to= ken, >> =C2=A0and IceCat is built correctly to use it. >> >> - However, on the same foreign distro, when I install IceCat 68 from >> =C2=A0Guix, it doesn't work.=C2=A0 I get an "Unknown U2F Error". >> >> - Reminder: Firefox also works on this foreign distro.=C2=A0 The "Unkn= own U2F >> =C2=A0Error" does not occur. >=20 > Great work. What dependencies did you have to provide on the non-Guix > system? >=20 > [=E2=80=A6] >> If anyone has any advice about how to determine what code is actually >> emitting the "Unknown U2F Error", that would really help me narrow >> down the possibilities quite a bit. >=20 > I don't know if this will be helpful, but as I understand webauthn, > browsers provide a new JavaScript API for interacting with security > tokens. I suspect that the error is being generated some code the > browser calls a JavaScript program it has loaded calls that API. The > text may not be in the IceCat source, but presented by the JavaScript > program in response to and error in its API call. I was thinking, but > haven't had the time, to set up my own webauthn-using app, so I can > control the JavaScript. >=20 > That's my best guess at least, but it could be wrong, so don't let me > lead you astray :) >=20 > Best, > Jack
Narcis Garcia <informatica@HIDDEN>
:bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-gnuzilla@HIDDEN
:bug#38358
; Package gnuzilla
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.