GNU bug report logs - #38491
Evolution is missing GPG

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>; dated Wed, 4 Dec 2019 12:12:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 38491 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 38491) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2019 17:51:38 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 05 12:51:38 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45141 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1icvHu-0005Dm-Hh
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 12:51:38 -0500
Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:21277)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1icvHr-0005Dc-7s
 for 38491 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 12:51:36 -0500
Received: from nijino.local (213-240-64-42.hdsl.highway.telekom.at
 [213.240.64.42])
 by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47TNZB5jLwz1LLyf;
 Thu,  5 Dec 2019 18:51:30 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 47TNZB5jLwz1LLyf
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at;
 s=mailrelay; t=1575568291;
 bh=nphzBq9XNLGuh+NQR/D0g1pYtofxubYlRE96sfQBhcY=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=KHTykh1tN25JCA55KMIbFSoPwk0V0Yv5/iDmfuVM2hDj1QGMCaY+Og8I+BoQSqFhd
 XWbQQvboLfsFGwci3c3EGymftIDylj08tIRwYOoQSTxehUlPnw8s+eFUY2qo0U/aGi
 6YwqtZzWXMvoPvhJ9qNFyroi15G6dRiPnvIL5MKs=
Message-ID: <1412925405263531af01b81301e61d13891752d5.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#38491: Evolution is missing GPG
From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>
To: Jesse Gibbons <jgibbons2357@HIDDEN>, 38491 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 18:51:25 +0100
In-Reply-To: <36bd0ad85c26bdee2d5a957b1f067fa24f67f3e1.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <51e3a6f2bca86b7ad6107ec921c54464f4f6a51e.camel@HIDDEN>
 <36bd0ad85c26bdee2d5a957b1f067fa24f67f3e1.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw
X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 
X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.117
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38491
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Am Donnerstag, den 05.12.2019, 09:53 -0700 schrieb Jesse Gibbons:
> On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 13:11 +0100, Leo Prikler wrote:
> > Hi Guix,
> > 
> > I recently discovered, that Evolution would complain about a
> > missing
> > GPG whenever it encounters a signed message.  For the record, I've
> > only
> > installed evolution-data-server in the operating-system and
> > evolution
> > itself inside my user profile and not installed gpg in either
> > place,
> > thus causing this issue.  Would it make sense to make gpg an input
> > to
> > evolution and hardcode the path in the source?  Or would it perhaps
> > be
> > better to have it as propagated input?  WDYT?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Leo
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> Guix complains that it cannot find gpg when I call "guix import gnu
> <package>". But unless I'm using a function of guix that depends on
> gpg,
> guix is not broken, so gpg is not an input or propagated input of
> guix. I
> think we have the same situation here. Evolution is functional
> without GPG,
> and handles itself fairly well when gpg is not found.
> 
> Try installing gpg locally and see if it stops complaining. If so, we
> have a
> solution. If not, we should consider adding GPG as a propagated input
> to
> Evolution.
That does fix the problem itself, but I personally believe there should
be a better way of handling "optional" inputs -- "optional" because in
at least some if not many cases, people would expect them to exist. 
Guix' emacs has imagemagick as input for instance (even though it is
optional) and a separate emacs-minimal exists as the version without it
and other optional inputs.  I think this pattern could be applied more
broadly.

Regards,
Leo





Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#38491; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 38491 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 38491) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2019 16:53:59 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 05 11:53:59 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45102 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1icuO6-0003e5-TF
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:53:59 -0500
Received: from mail-il1-f179.google.com ([209.85.166.179]:41711)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <jgibbons2357@HIDDEN>) id 1icuO5-0003dt-RY
 for 38491 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:53:58 -0500
Received: by mail-il1-f179.google.com with SMTP id z90so3584071ilc.8
 for <38491 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 08:53:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=message-id:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:date:mime-version
 :user-agent:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=lV/VoXNQy19JUkX6w/VPmmEcfRIGGxO5rxRXH7c0ql0=;
 b=oZLXIVU3DIPRaAWf1gj9nFMkIromcQTboT47axjGU2KYhSV2PyEv2IsSXSVq511iT1
 f707NGBt3BcNM1jIocKFvkrURwVOGck9MuBfU5H+flcDYId8O6K236Eqlal5J7PTgvSD
 eLIdBHSABWNd4ttMrG0mtjd2XRPzw4XVOrKIE5qQnCNWSR0q6z8eqFcyhjQAGcwmBztd
 JiJJ1mMONGmoFONQSEpQ3sxLRHWGj9Bshut99iBRT8Q9a83xuwqcswGhKhWvpZcExgtM
 jZWtQ5exYfDdo9K9+Xcr+lorn/aEBnAv9W/Waj+I8ZORTBh4buXqbN4K3p1uR1+h9giw
 B+1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:in-reply-to
 :references:date:mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=lV/VoXNQy19JUkX6w/VPmmEcfRIGGxO5rxRXH7c0ql0=;
 b=VNS4VBiGzsT5PpPg1BA1Sk1z6DhVeA7X0FGIm4ienrSFSlUHDiR+G1rqFsCZrM4kAq
 ebmGYSaRWakGX/HXGIa7D4cfaWKZ1d68akQot4gVQewP/fUFuo7xgGavBecZ/wcprbDZ
 OCzZ24k70fWzGrFtc44AdkmQSEEXqfa7mqhWuZPp4g7Vgp0cXxly2j3ch20AcUopiWC8
 I9NhlMrSnExKGsELAgU5jKHjTrpKCOVJdmSeNZt28jGYAi9/Yd/FT2RzaKtJzuXmeY3N
 oLm9C0N9+k013DpDBfdY+J+t3GHgtotd+ze67ICCxwCWElKmtZbef6j592g7YxN80Jg+
 nHUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXup6w+XoP+UuvpWGd/zNpwa2AyQJnKLrioCHBSTez+mdY1V7Yn
 X/fjA5IXyuw82HlN0Y8ejyOOLAoV
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxdrBCQEDec8yKADWghIjfHYq+OAW1rfrJoNuwwfXyIhMkzAeAcN/MZwr8jGC0aNezU9NiBVA==
X-Received: by 2002:a92:6801:: with SMTP id d1mr9049172ilc.15.1575564832242;
 Thu, 05 Dec 2019 08:53:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from piranhaplant.local ([157.201.96.100])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s23sm2976993ild.48.2019.12.05.08.53.51
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Thu, 05 Dec 2019 08:53:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <36bd0ad85c26bdee2d5a957b1f067fa24f67f3e1.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#38491: Evolution is missing GPG
From: Jesse Gibbons <jgibbons2357@HIDDEN>
To: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>, 38491 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <51e3a6f2bca86b7ad6107ec921c54464f4f6a51e.camel@HIDDEN>
References: <51e3a6f2bca86b7ad6107ec921c54464f4f6a51e.camel@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 09:53:50 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38491
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/)

On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 13:11 +0100, Leo Prikler wrote:
> Hi Guix,
> 
> I recently discovered, that Evolution would complain about a missing
> GPG whenever it encounters a signed message.  For the record, I've only
> installed evolution-data-server in the operating-system and evolution
> itself inside my user profile and not installed gpg in either place,
> thus causing this issue.  Would it make sense to make gpg an input to
> evolution and hardcode the path in the source?  Or would it perhaps be
> better to have it as propagated input?  WDYT?
> 
> Regards,
> Leo
> 
> 
> 
> 
Guix complains that it cannot find gpg when I call "guix import gnu
<package>". But unless I'm using a function of guix that depends on gpg,
guix is not broken, so gpg is not an input or propagated input of guix. I
think we have the same situation here. Evolution is functional without GPG,
and handles itself fairly well when gpg is not found.

Try installing gpg locally and see if it stops complaining. If so, we have a
solution. If not, we should consider adding GPG as a propagated input to
Evolution.





Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#38491; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2019 12:11:46 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 04 07:11:46 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41514 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1icTVR-0005YA-Nr
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:11:45 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33869)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1icTVP-0005Y0-D4
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:11:43 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49877)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1icTVN-0004Kw-2e
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:11:42 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
 URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1icTVG-0000gx-JQ
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:11:36 -0500
Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:1437)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>)
 id 1icTVG-00006A-1u
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:11:34 -0500
Received: from nijino.local (213-240-64-42.hdsl.highway.telekom.at
 [213.240.64.42])
 by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47Sd4G6HNmz1LBL5
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Wed,  4 Dec 2019 13:11:26 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 47Sd4G6HNmz1LBL5
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at;
 s=mailrelay; t=1575461486;
 bh=lG4+vBbl7CjtnqY1zDdo0PVmmgyVhCCgel+Q3VK4z6k=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date:From;
 b=f1xTTrFJU914h6kdxUS5WTf3JDJg9qSOU0ymkB+u2fgIUAbmxCN3s9KHuYtSRybSA
 hrIcZFNJ+r8ziA4pXWl/BiDV37Zd1+Nyhi7cP9MmgKaR6td0dfFCiuXA6SAIJG52Dq
 T20b7Jm7AIgijwf0PDRb4WwP4EcYiZgjSw6KhwPU=
Message-ID: <51e3a6f2bca86b7ad6107ec921c54464f4f6a51e.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Evolution is missing GPG
From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 13:11:19 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.117
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
 [fuzzy]
X-Received-From: 129.27.2.202
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

Hi Guix,

I recently discovered, that Evolution would complain about a missing
GPG whenever it encounters a signed message.  For the record, I've only
installed evolution-data-server in the operating-system and evolution
itself inside my user profile and not installed gpg in either place,
thus causing this issue.  Would it make sense to make gpg an input to
evolution and hardcode the path in the source?  Or would it perhaps be
better to have it as propagated input?  WDYT?

Regards,
Leo





Acknowledgement sent to Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#38491; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 18:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.