GNU bug report logs -
#38700
Yoshimi 1.6.1 source hash mismatch
Previous Next
Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 16:34:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 38700 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 38700 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
rekado <at> elephly.net, bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38700
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 21 Dec 2019 16:34:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
rekado <at> elephly.net, bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 21 Dec 2019 16:34:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi!
We’re getting a hash mismatch for Yoshimi and ci.guix.gnu.org doesn’t
have it in cache:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix build yoshimi -S
La jena derivo estos konstruata:
/gnu/store/iz0h16wnnz4jf3h2fj8y6dzbkchw71g7-yoshimi-1.6.1.tar.bz2.drv
building /gnu/store/iz0h16wnnz4jf3h2fj8y6dzbkchw71g7-yoshimi-1.6.1.tar.bz2.drv...
Starting download of /gnu/store/sa6iyx1as4z7y12dzr94rr37rv76fzw0-yoshimi-1.6.1.tar.bz2
From http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/yoshimi/1.6/yoshimi-1.6.1.tar.bz2...
following redirection to `https://iweb.dl.sourceforge.net/project/yoshimi/1.6/yoshimi-1.6.1.tar.bz2'...
downloading from http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/yoshimi/1.6/yoshimi-1.6.1.tar.bz2...
yoshimi-1.6.1.tar.bz2 9.2MiB 1.3MiB/s 00:07 [##################] 100.0%
sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/sa6iyx1as4z7y12dzr94rr37rv76fzw0-yoshimi-1.6.1.tar.bz2:
expected hash: 1shnz429zgl0b4y5bpb61frk1747jwqfahq4hx44c972580zghzh
actual hash: 044k2pcdsb43znc8q63mc4niggpain7wl9s5c4sgsfmrjh0bjapj
hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/sa6iyx1as4z7y12dzr94rr37rv76fzw0-yoshimi-1.6.1.tar.bz2'
build of /gnu/store/iz0h16wnnz4jf3h2fj8y6dzbkchw71g7-yoshimi-1.6.1.tar.bz2.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/iz/0h16wnnz4jf3h2fj8y6dzbkchw71g7-yoshimi-1.6.1.tar.bz2.drv.bz2'.
guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/iz0h16wnnz4jf3h2fj8y6dzbkchw71g7-yoshimi-1.6.1.tar.bz2.drv' failed
$ guix describe
Generacio 120 Dec 16 2019 23:52:03 (nuna)
guix d08c3e5
repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
branch: master
commit: d08c3e51ab62575e722aec24fba42a0cb84198cc
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Ricardo or anyone who might have the previous Yoshimi tarball, could you
take a look?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38700
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 21 Dec 2019 17:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 38700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> We’re getting a hash mismatch for Yoshimi and ci.guix.gnu.org doesn’t
> have it in cache: […]
> Ricardo or anyone who might have the previous Yoshimi tarball, could you
> take a look?
I ran guix gc earlier today, so I no longer have the tarball :(
It’s a new release, so my guess is that they made a mistake somewhere
and quickly published an updated tarball.
--
Ricardo
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#38700
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 28 May 2020 13:36:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 38700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> We’re getting a hash mismatch for Yoshimi and ci.guix.gnu.org doesn’t
>> have it in cache: […]
>> Ricardo or anyone who might have the previous Yoshimi tarball, could you
>> take a look?
>
> I ran guix gc earlier today, so I no longer have the tarball :(
>
> It’s a new release, so my guess is that they made a mistake somewhere
> and quickly published an updated tarball.
The yoshimi package version is now at 1.7.0.1 (and it fails to build for
me, but that's another issue).
Closing!
Maxim
Reply sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Thu, 28 May 2020 13:36:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Thu, 28 May 2020 13:36:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 38700-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> We’re getting a hash mismatch for Yoshimi and ci.guix.gnu.org doesn’t
>> have it in cache: […]
>> Ricardo or anyone who might have the previous Yoshimi tarball, could you
>> take a look?
>
> I ran guix gc earlier today, so I no longer have the tarball :(
>
> It’s a new release, so my guess is that they made a mistake somewhere
> and quickly published an updated tarball.
The yoshimi package version is now at 1.7.0.1 (and it fails to build for
me, but that's another issue).
Closing!
Maxim
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 305 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.