GNU bug report logs - #38894
gnu: Add gssdp.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 38894 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 38894 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Raghav Gururajan <raghavgururajan <at> disroot.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: gnu: Add gssdp.
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 10:43:01 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello Guix!

Please find the attached patch for adding gssdp.

Regards,
RG.

[gssdp.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #8 received at 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
To: Raghav Gururajan <raghavgururajan <at> disroot.org>
Cc: 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#38894] gnu: Add gssdp.
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 23:18:34 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Please use 

  guix lint gssdp

to validate this patch.

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #11 received at 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
To: Raghav Gururajan <raghavgururajan <at> disroot.org>
Cc: 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#38894] gnu: Add gssdp.
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 23:20:26 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

gobject-introspection should be a native-input, and vala too.

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #14 received at 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Raghav Gururajan" <raghavgururajan <at> disroot.org>
To: "Danny Milosavljevic" <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
Cc: 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#38894] gnu: Add gssdp.
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 22:27:51 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello Danny!

> gobject-introspection should be a native-input, and vala too.

Please find the revised patch attached.

Regards,
RG.

[gssdp.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

Message #17 received at 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
To: Raghav Gururajan <raghavgururajan <at> disroot.org>
Cc: 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#38894] gnu: Add gssdp.
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 23:31:21 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

The license is gpl 2 or later, right?

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Raghav Gururajan" <raghavgururajan <at> disroot.org>
To: "Danny Milosavljevic" <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
Cc: 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#38894] gnu: Add gssdp.
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 22:34:55 +0000

Hello Danny!

> The license is gpl 2 or later, right?

It says GPL v2 (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gssdp/blob/master/COPYING).

Regards,
RG.

Message #23 received at 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
To: "Raghav Gururajan" <raghavgururajan <at> disroot.org>
Cc: 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#38894] gnu: Add gssdp.
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 23:40:34 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

That file contains LGPL 2 (not GPL2).

Moreover, the important part is whether the source files contain a comment
header which specifies "or later" or not.

Please provide a license review of the source files that are the source of
files that are installed (only).

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #26 received at 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Raghav Gururajan" <raghavgururajan <at> disroot.org>
To: "Danny Milosavljevic" <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
Cc: 38894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#38894] gnu: Add gssdp.
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 22:53:08 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello Danny!

> That file contains LGPL 2 (not GPL2).
> 
> Moreover, the important part is whether the source files contain a comment
> header which specifies "or later" or not.
> 
> Please provide a license review of the source files that are the source of
> files that are installed (only).

Sorry, I misunderstood the Library<-->Lesser.

Please find the revised patch attached.

Regards,
RG.

[gssdp.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

Message #31 received at 38894-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
To: Raghav Gururajan <raghavgururajan <at> disroot.org>
Cc: 38894-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#38894] gnu: Add gssdp.
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 08:38:01 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Pushed to guix master as commit e2aed29c798711a765dc3cd7e76f423b2447d22c
after moving gtk-doc to native-inputs.

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.