GNU bug report logs - #39160
TeX Live 2019 wanted

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>

Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:54:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 39160 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 39160 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#39160; Package guix. (Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:54:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:54:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: Mikhail Kryshen <mikhail <at> kryshen.net>
Cc: guix-devel <at> gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>, bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: TeX Live 2019 wanted
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 09:53:00 +0100
Mikhail Kryshen <mikhail <at> kryshen.net> writes:

> - font files are missing from texlive-latex-lh (shouldn't it be called
>   texlive-lh?).

Thank you, that’s a good one.  Generally, the texlive-latex-* packages
are of the old type that may very well be incomplete.  I’ll replace this
one with texlive-lh which will include all the source files as it
should.

Thanks for the report!

--
Ricardo





Reply sent to Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:27:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:27:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 39160-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: 39160-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Mikhail Kryshen <mikhail <at> kryshen.net>,
 mail <at> ambrevar.xyz
Subject: Re: bug#39160: TeX Live 2019 wanted
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 09:25:49 -0500
Hi,

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> writes:

> Mikhail Kryshen <mikhail <at> kryshen.net> writes:
>
>> - font files are missing from texlive-latex-lh (shouldn't it be called
>>   texlive-lh?).
>
> Thank you, that’s a good one.  Generally, the texlive-latex-* packages
> are of the old type that may very well be incomplete.  I’ll replace this
> one with texlive-lh which will include all the source files as it
> should.
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
> --
> Ricardo

This appears to have been fixed with commit
7899a10e8e868936adec9f4fe9cef7ea2d125682.

Thanks for the report!

Closing.

Maxim




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 03 Mar 2021 12:24:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 54 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.