GNU bug report logs -
#39205
date -d '...' should support superset of POSIX 'at' dates
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 39205 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39205
; Package
coreutils
.
(Mon, 20 Jan 2020 16:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 20 Jan 2020 16:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On today's Austin Group meeting, the question of whether some form of
'date -d "..."' should be specified. While there is no way that POSIX
would standardize everything that GNU date can parse, there was an idea
that supporting '@seconds' since Epoch, plus all of the formats already
required to be supported by the 'at' utility
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/at.html might
be acceptable.
But that would imply that we want gnulib's date parser to be a superset
of the grammar required by 'at'. We are already most of the way there;
required support dates such as '2pm + 1 week', '2pm next week', and
'tomorrow' work; but we are lacking at least 'midnight'. Thus, I'm
opening this bug to remind us to add the remaining few items to our date
grammar, so that we can parse everything 'at' is required to support,
and in case POSIX does decide to standardize -d using the 'at' grammar
as a starting point.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 309 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.