GNU bug report logs -
#39298
re-exporting local variable: iota
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 39298 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 39298 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39298
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 26 Jan 2020 20:49:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 26 Jan 2020 20:49:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Since the upgrade to Guile 3.0 I can no longer upgrade my profile. The
module-import-compiled derivation can no longer be built. It fails with
a backtrace involving only Guile modules, no Guix modules.
The error is:
ice-9/boot-9.scm:752:25: In procedure dispatch-exception:
re-exporting local variable: iota
This happens when compiling guix/build/utils.scm, srfi/srfi-1.scm, and
srfi/srfi-26.scm, i.e. /gnu/store/p4lwp5ghh4vsna72k7if132k2321hhw1-module-import.
I have only just reconfigured the system and have not rebooted since.
--
Ricardo
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39298
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 26 Jan 2020 21:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 39298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
This happens even after a reboot, so that’s reassuring.
This is tied to building the derivation for the “sicp” package, which
has this arguments field:
(arguments
`(#:modules ((guix build utils)
(srfi srfi-1)
(srfi srfi-26))
#:builder
(begin
(use-modules (guix build utils)
(srfi srfi-1)
(srfi srfi-26))
…)))
That’s where utils and the srfis come from.
--
Ricardo
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39298
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:47:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 39298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> writes:
> Since the upgrade to Guile 3.0 I can no longer upgrade my profile. The
> module-import-compiled derivation can no longer be built. It fails with
> a backtrace involving only Guile modules, no Guix modules.
>
> The error is:
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:752:25: In procedure dispatch-exception:
> re-exporting local variable: iota
>
> This happens when compiling guix/build/utils.scm, srfi/srfi-1.scm, and
> srfi/srfi-26.scm, i.e. /gnu/store/p4lwp5ghh4vsna72k7if132k2321hhw1-module-import.
>
> I have only just reconfigured the system and have not rebooted since.
>
> --
> Ricardo
Hi,
This happens on
$ guix build gajim
with
Generation 23 janv. 27 2020 11:03:29 (current)
guix 4a0e492
repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
branch: master
commit: 4a0e49279ddc53655f593796b0b1e170369d2a08
Clément
Reply sent
to
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 39298-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello!
clement <at> lassieur.org (Clément Lassieur) skribis:
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> writes:
>
>> Since the upgrade to Guile 3.0 I can no longer upgrade my profile. The
>> module-import-compiled derivation can no longer be built. It fails with
>> a backtrace involving only Guile modules, no Guix modules.
>>
>> The error is:
>>
>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:752:25: In procedure dispatch-exception:
>> re-exporting local variable: iota
>>
>> This happens when compiling guix/build/utils.scm, srfi/srfi-1.scm, and
>> srfi/srfi-26.scm, i.e. /gnu/store/p4lwp5ghh4vsna72k7if132k2321hhw1-module-import.
>>
>> I have only just reconfigured the system and have not rebooted since.
>>
>> --
>> Ricardo
>
> Hi,
>
> This happens on
>
> $ guix build gajim
Fixed in 5e61de242156cdb3314abac168d9682ca7a4c28f.
Ricardo, does it also solve the problem for you? If not, please let us
know how to reproduce it.
Let’s see if there are other instances of mistakes like this one.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39298
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:47:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 39298-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Fixed in 5e61de242156cdb3314abac168d9682ca7a4c28f.
Thank you for the quick fix!
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 25 Feb 2020 12:24:09 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 62 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.