GNU bug report logs - #39651
/software/guile/docs/ lacks 3.0

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 39651 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 39651 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Shigorin <mike <at> altlinux.org>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Cc: Sergey B Kirpichev <skirpichev <at> gmail.com>
Subject: /software/guile/docs/ lacks 3.0
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:11:19 +0300

	Hello,
a forum commenter has brought my attention to the fact that
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/ page mentions "Preview
Reference Manual for unreleased Guile 2.2 (development branch)"
and fails to mention 3.0 completely (even if it's been released
recently).

So please refer to Sergey if any kind of reference is due :-)

-- 
 ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin / http://altlinux.org
  ------ http://opennet.ru / http://anna-news.info

Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sergey B Kirpichev <skirpichev <at> gmail.com>
To: Michael Shigorin <mike <at> altlinux.org>
Cc: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: /software/guile/docs/ lacks 3.0
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:02:25 +0300

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:11:19AM +0300, Michael Shigorin wrote:
> a forum commenter has brought my attention to the fact that
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/ page mentions "Preview
> Reference Manual for unreleased Guile 2.2 (development branch)"
> and fails to mention 3.0 completely (even if it's been released recently).

No.  I was mentioned, that you provide link to the old
release (as a stable version).  Guile docs seems fine for
me: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/learn/

Message #13 received at 39651-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> igalia.com>
To: Michael Shigorin <mike <at> altlinux.org>
Cc: 39651-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Sergey B Kirpichev <skirpichev <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#39651: /software/guile/docs/ lacks 3.0
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:40:44 +0100

Michael Shigorin <mike <at> altlinux.org> writes:

> 	Hello,
> a forum commenter has brought my attention to the fact that
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/ page mentions "Preview
> Reference Manual for unreleased Guile 2.2 (development branch)"
> and fails to mention 3.0 completely (even if it's been released
> recently).
>
> So please refer to Sergey if any kind of reference is due :-)

Thanks for the report!  Turns out that page was stale and AFAIU
unreachable; I have garbage-collected it and put in a forwarding pointer
to /learn :)

Cheers,

Andy

Message #16 received at 39651-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Shigorin <mike <at> altlinux.org>
To: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> igalia.com>
Cc: 39651-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Sergey B Kirpichev <skirpichev <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#39651: /software/guile/docs/ lacks 3.0
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:07:40 +0300

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:40:44PM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> > a forum commenter has brought my attention to the fact that
> > https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/ page mentions "Preview
> > Reference Manual for unreleased Guile 2.2 (development branch)"
> > and fails to mention 3.0 completely (even if it's been released
> > recently).
> Thanks for the report!  Turns out that page was stale and AFAIU
> unreachable; I have garbage-collected it and put in a
> forwarding pointer to /learn :)

Thank you, updated the link from http://altlinux.org/scheme
(our Russian wiki) accordingly ;-) (that's basically what
was proposed by Sergey either)

-- 
 ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin / http://altlinux.org
  ------ http://opennet.ru / http://anna-news.info

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.