GNU bug report logs - #39976
next browser fails to build

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 39976 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 39976 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tomáš Čech <sleep_walker <at> gnu.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Cc: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: next browser fails to build
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 16:28:31 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

what is the status of next browser?

When I noticed there is such thing I was happy as it could be
replacement for Conkeror and even with better language to use....

I used to have crashes pretty often and usually blamed WebKit for that...

But for some time I'm not able even to build it.

It seems that I have the same issue as can be seen here:

 https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/91snb4sd5c6xrp930s3v5a5yrxfr0n3h-next-1.5.0


Thanks in advance,

Tomáš Čech

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: Tomáš Čech <sleep_walker <at> gnu.org>, bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: next browser fails to build
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 17:13:00 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi!

Glad to see you are interested in Next! :)

Next 1.5.0 should work rather well on Guix.

However the SBCL 2.0.2 update broke it.  But no worries, I've just
pushed a fix so you should able to install Next after a `guix pull'.

I'm hard at work with Next 2.0 and it should fix some long standing
issues that are still in Next 1.5.0.

Stay tuned!

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #13 received at 39976-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tomáš Čech <sleep_walker <at> gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 39976-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: next browser fails to build
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 17:39:45 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi!

On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 05:13:00PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Glad to see you are interested in Next! :)
>
>Next 1.5.0 should work rather well on Guix.
>
>However the SBCL 2.0.2 update broke it.  But no worries, I've just
>pushed a fix so you should able to install Next after a `guix pull'.
>
>I'm hard at work with Next 2.0 and it should fix some long standing
>issues that are still in Next 1.5.0.

Thanks for swift response and reaction. I can confirm that new pull
fixes the issue for me.

>Stay tuned!

I will, good luck with 2.0!

Best regards,

Tomáš Čech


PS: I used bug-tracker e-mail in initial e-mail but you got the e-mail
   without assigned bug. So your response probably opened new one -
   please, be so kind and close it.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #16 received at 39976-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: Tomáš Čech <sleep_walker <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 39976-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: next browser fails to build
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 17:52:26 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Tomáš Čech <sleep_walker <at> gnu.org> writes:

> PS: I used bug-tracker e-mail in initial e-mail but you got the e-mail
>     without assigned bug. So your response probably opened new one -
>     please, be so kind and close it.

I don't see a second bug.  Do you have a link?

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #19 received at 39976 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: mike <at> rohleder.de
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: sleep_walker <at> gnu.org, 39976 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#39976: next browser fails to build
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 17:58:09 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> writes:
> However the SBCL 2.0.2 update broke it.  But no worries, I've just
> pushed a fix so you should able to install Next after a `guix pull'.

Thank you very much!

I can also confirm that it builds now.

Regards
mike

-- 
Happiness does not depend on what you have or who your are.
It solely relies on what you think.
   Buddha

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.