GNU bug report logs - #39990
[PATCH] gnu: Update python-statsmodels to 0.11.1.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 39990 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 39990 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update python-statsmodels to 0.11.1.
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 23:19:06 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear Guix,

I'd like to update python-statsmodels because I'm packaging something
that requires a newer version.

The patch is trivial, but I'm unsure whether it would trigger too many
rebuilds.  How do I check this?

Kind regards,
Roel Janssen

[0001-gnu-Update-python-statsmodels-to-0.11.1.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 39990 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 39990 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#39990] [PATCH] gnu: Update python-statsmodels to 0.11.1.
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:45:49 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 11:19:06PM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote:
> Dear Guix,
> 
> I'd like to update python-statsmodels because I'm packaging something
> that requires a newer version.
> 
> The patch is trivial, but I'm unsure whether it would trigger too many
> rebuilds.  How do I check this?

'guix refresh --list-dependent python-statsmodels' will give you a list of leaf
packages affected by this package. As a python package, you should also
check the python2- variant, so 'guix refresh -l python-statsmodels
python2-statsmodels'

> From d093fc2baac1102685b4d14bd8bfed2d20da2545 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
> Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 23:16:34 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update python-statsmodels to 0.11.1.
> 
> * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (python-statsmodels): Update to 0.11.1.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/statistics.scm | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/statistics.scm b/gnu/packages/statistics.scm
> index 12d8a20766..13d64be498 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/statistics.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/statistics.scm
> @@ -1880,14 +1880,14 @@ building design matrices.")
>  (define-public python-statsmodels
>    (package
>      (name "python-statsmodels")
> -    (version "0.9.0")
> +    (version "0.11.1")
>      (source
>       (origin
>         (method url-fetch)
>         (uri (pypi-uri "statsmodels" version))
>         (sha256
>          (base32
> -         "0fxs8a7sp4d7jvqlm36yi45i2d28kjfvraf9q8i9jr1chhxgjqb4"))))
> +         "1w6mf8b86vizi2895j11szqryr2v1ckjig3wp9fv94aslfh3zpjv"))))
>      (build-system python-build-system)
>      (arguments
>       `(;; The test suite is very large and rather brittle.  Tests often fail
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #11 received at 39990 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 39990 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#39990] [PATCH] gnu: Update python-statsmodels to 0.11.1.
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 12:20:47 +0100

On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 12:45 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 11:19:06PM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote:
> > Dear Guix,
> > 
> > I'd like to update python-statsmodels because I'm packaging
> > something
> > that requires a newer version.
> > 
> > The patch is trivial, but I'm unsure whether it would trigger too
> > many
> > rebuilds.  How do I check this?
> 
> 'guix refresh --list-dependent python-statsmodels' will give you a
> list of leaf
> packages affected by this package. As a python package, you should
> also
> check the python2- variant, so 'guix refresh -l python-statsmodels
> python2-statsmodels'
> 

Thanks!  Is my conclusion correct that, by updating python-statsmodels
(and thus python2-statsmodels), only "ribodiff" will be rebuilt?  And
therefore, the update can be pushed to master directly?

Thanks!

Kind regards,
Roel Janssen

Message #14 received at 39990 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 39990 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#39990] [PATCH] gnu: Update python-statsmodels to 0.11.1.
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:47:49 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 12:20:47PM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 12:45 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 11:19:06PM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote:
> > > Dear Guix,
> > > 
> > > I'd like to update python-statsmodels because I'm packaging
> > > something
> > > that requires a newer version.
> > > 
> > > The patch is trivial, but I'm unsure whether it would trigger too
> > > many
> > > rebuilds.  How do I check this?
> > 
> > 'guix refresh --list-dependent python-statsmodels' will give you a
> > list of leaf
> > packages affected by this package. As a python package, you should
> > also
> > check the python2- variant, so 'guix refresh -l python-statsmodels
> > python2-statsmodels'
> > 
> 
> Thanks!  Is my conclusion correct that, by updating python-statsmodels
> (and thus python2-statsmodels), only "ribodiff" will be rebuilt?  And
> therefore, the update can be pushed to master directly?

Yep, straight to master. Although if ribodiff builds before your patch
and then doesn't after you're on the hook to fix it :)

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #19 received at 39990-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 39990-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#39990] [PATCH] gnu: Update python-statsmodels to 0.11.1.
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 13:04:59 +0100

On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 13:47 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 12:20:47PM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 12:45 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 11:19:06PM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote:
> > > > Dear Guix,
> > > > 
> > > > I'd like to update python-statsmodels because I'm packaging
> > > > something
> > > > that requires a newer version.
> > > > 
> > > > The patch is trivial, but I'm unsure whether it would trigger
> > > > too
> > > > many
> > > > rebuilds.  How do I check this?
> > > 
> > > 'guix refresh --list-dependent python-statsmodels' will give you
> > > a
> > > list of leaf
> > > packages affected by this package. As a python package, you
> > > should
> > > also
> > > check the python2- variant, so 'guix refresh -l python-
> > > statsmodels
> > > python2-statsmodels'
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks!  Is my conclusion correct that, by updating python-
> > statsmodels
> > (and thus python2-statsmodels), only "ribodiff" will be
> > rebuilt?  And
> > therefore, the update can be pushed to master directly?
> 
> Yep, straight to master. Although if ribodiff builds before your
> patch
> and then doesn't after you're on the hook to fix it :)

Hehe.  Well, it ribodiff seems to fail even with the older python-
statsmodels.  I am looking into it right away.

Thanks for your help!  I pushed the update in b6574660e3.

Kind regards,
Roel Janssen

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.