GNU bug report logs - #40073
Checksum mismatch on python-llvmlite patch

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>

Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 12:26:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 40073 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 40073 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#40073; Package guix. (Sun, 15 Mar 2020 12:26:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Sun, 15 Mar 2020 12:26:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Checksum mismatch on python-llvmlite patch
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:25:43 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

python-llvmlite fails to build because it tries to download a patch that
has the wrong checksum.

Starting download of /gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch
From https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/conda-recipes/D47188-svml-VF.patch...
downloading from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/conda-recipes/D47188-svml-VF.patch...
 D47188-svml-VF.patch  73KiB                             1.5MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0%
sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch:
  expected hash: 0wxhgb61k17f0zg2m0726sf3hppm41f8jar2kkg2n8sl5cnjj9mr
  actual hash:   0dlr2kmzjrif0wgqql1s3f6pmmsa8fjwjpm08ni68wwvjjx2lcli
hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch'
build of /gnu/store/vgni0s5mqdyc8pijaz1pdb6pirqd7ddh-D47188-svml-VF.patch.drv failed

This is likely a regression from
6608727262f45d351c55cd1ae40414db7768a374 and would go unnoticed if you
already had the previous patch in your store with the expected checksum.

I tried to simply update the patch, but the updated patch fails to apply
on LLVM 7, and the *other* patch fails to apply if I change to LLVM 8.

There is a new version of python-llvmlite out too, but no changes to the
patches.

Not sure what to do from here, help wanted!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Reply sent to Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Mon, 30 Nov 2020 04:36:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Mon, 30 Nov 2020 04:36:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 40073-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: 40073-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#40073: Checksum mismatch on python-llvmlite patch
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 23:35:51 -0500
Hello,

Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> python-llvmlite fails to build because it tries to download a patch that
> has the wrong checksum.
>
> Starting download of /gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch
> From https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/conda-recipes/D47188-svml-VF.patch...
> downloading from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/conda-recipes/D47188-svml-VF.patch...
>  D47188-svml-VF.patch  73KiB                             1.5MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0%
> sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch:
>   expected hash: 0wxhgb61k17f0zg2m0726sf3hppm41f8jar2kkg2n8sl5cnjj9mr
>   actual hash:   0dlr2kmzjrif0wgqql1s3f6pmmsa8fjwjpm08ni68wwvjjx2lcli
> hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch'
> build of /gnu/store/vgni0s5mqdyc8pijaz1pdb6pirqd7ddh-D47188-svml-VF.patch.drv failed
>
> This is likely a regression from
> 6608727262f45d351c55cd1ae40414db7768a374 and would go unnoticed if you
> already had the previous patch in your store with the expected checksum.
>
> I tried to simply update the patch, but the updated patch fails to apply
> on LLVM 7, and the *other* patch fails to apply if I change to LLVM 8.
>
> There is a new version of python-llvmlite out too, but no changes to the
> patches.
>
> Not sure what to do from here, help wanted!

I fixed this in commit 8a34f292923cc4b6487e39570a9c6e0526b094e1, earlier
this month.

Closing,

Thanks for the report!

Maxim




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:24:12 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 112 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.