GNU bug report logs - #40081
[PATCH] gnu: bluez: Update to 5.54.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 40081 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 40081 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: bluez: Update to 5.54.
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 19:11:35 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I checked that the CVE patches have been applied upstream.

-- 
Vincent Legoll

[0001-gnu-bluez-Update-to-5.54.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 40081 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
To: 40081 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: bluez: Update to 5.54.
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 19:13:17 +0100

But I have not tested the new version,
I'm in a VM with no bluetooth HW...

-- 
Vincent Legoll

Message #11 received at 40081 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 40081 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#40081] [PATCH] gnu: bluez: Update to 5.54.
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:24:54 -0400

On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 07:13:17PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> But I have not tested the new version,
> I'm in a VM with no bluetooth HW...

That's okay, I think we can expect it to "just work".

Message #16 received at 40081-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 40081-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#40081] [PATCH] gnu: bluez: Update to 5.54.
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:26:07 -0400

On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 07:11:35PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> From a84f040fd88b02b556a0fbd207f8edce1a940924 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 19:07:57 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: bluez: Update to 5.54.
> 
> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (bluez) : Update to 5.54.
> (bluez/fixed): remove variable.
> * gnu/packages/patches/bluez-CVE-2020-0556.patch: Remove file

Thanks!

I also removed the patch from 'gnu/local.mk' and made some small edits
to the commit message.

Pushed as f24aaa81de8c709adfda2e89271c562a5ca8d959

Message #19 received at 40081-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>, Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 40081-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#40081: [PATCH] gnu: bluez: Update to 5.54.
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:45:36 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> writes:

> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 07:11:35PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
>> From a84f040fd88b02b556a0fbd207f8edce1a940924 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 19:07:57 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: bluez: Update to 5.54.
>> 
>> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (bluez) : Update to 5.54.
>> (bluez/fixed): remove variable.
>> * gnu/packages/patches/bluez-CVE-2020-0556.patch: Remove file
>
> Thanks!
>
> I also removed the patch from 'gnu/local.mk' and made some small edits
> to the commit message.
>
> Pushed as f24aaa81de8c709adfda2e89271c562a5ca8d959

BlueZ causes 1000+ rebuilds according to 'guix refresh -l bluez'.
Berlin already failed to build pulseaudio on armhf, leaving ARM users
without substitutes until someone is able to restart all the builds:

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/11627?status=failed
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2390393/details

Should we revert it, or turn it into a graft?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #22 received at 40081-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>, 40081-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#40081: [PATCH] gnu: bluez: Update to 5.54.
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 21:04:38 -0400

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:45:36AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> BlueZ causes 1000+ rebuilds according to 'guix refresh -l bluez'.
> Berlin already failed to build pulseaudio on armhf, leaving ARM users
> without substitutes until someone is able to restart all the builds:
> 
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/11627?status=failed
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2390393/details
> 
> Should we revert it, or turn it into a graft?

Oops! Reverted...

Message #25 received at 40081-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>, 40081-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#40081: [PATCH] gnu: bluez: Update to 5.54.
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 21:07:48 -0400

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:45:36AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> BlueZ causes 1000+ rebuilds according to 'guix refresh -l bluez'.
> Berlin already failed to build pulseaudio on armhf, leaving ARM users
> without substitutes until someone is able to restart all the builds:
> 
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/11627?status=failed
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2390393/details
> 
> Should we revert it, or turn it into a graft?

I pushed the original change to a new 'staging' branch on Savannah.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.