GNU bug report logs - #41715
Guile 3.0.2 crashes with SIGBUS on x86_64 during 'guix pull'

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Severity: important; Reported by: o.rojon@HIDDEN; dated Thu, 4 Jun 2020 19:13:01 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Full text available.
Changed bug title to 'Guile 3.0.2 crashes with SIGBUS on x86_64 during 'guix pull'' from 'The program '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the derivation for guix' Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Full text available.

Message received at 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41715) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2020 14:12:42 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 12 10:12:42 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jjkQD-0004Ov-QL
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:12:42 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51024)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1jjkQA-0004Oc-LC
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:12:40 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36399)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jjkQ5-0002LI-5b; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:12:33 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:6a6c:dc17:fc02:cfda] (port=54396 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jjkQ3-0002K4-QX; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:12:32 -0400
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: o.rojon@HIDDEN
Subject: Re: bug#41715: The program
 '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the derivation
 for guix
References: <54320f33124f0122ed56fb7e15b17ae4@HIDDEN>
 <87sgfa7g9r.fsf@HIDDEN> <6a6c6f638f0a33ec39b9e70843090299@HIDDEN>
 <87mu5h1noe.fsf@HIDDEN> <97da9eb75628d48de3b8ef4abb212bca@HIDDEN>
 <87pnaasloq.fsf@HIDDEN> <e1fcc66a4a7d5f89e7135e0459ead070@HIDDEN>
 <87mu5cia64.fsf@HIDDEN> <47c4e596596303893a847212ffa4da9b@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 25 Prairial an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 16:12:30 +0200
In-Reply-To: <47c4e596596303893a847212ffa4da9b@HIDDEN> (o. rojon's message
 of "Fri, 12 Jun 2020 07:54:32 +0200")
Message-ID: <87zh9874q9.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41715
Cc: 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi Olivier,

o.rojon@HIDDEN skribis:

> I followed the steps you mentioned, the results you find here:
> https://www.mediafire.com/file/g5yz8f3pput8f3w/gdb-output/file  . The
> only part I omitted from the gdb output is the first lines mentioned
> the license. (Will look at IPFS, maybe next time :))

Since it=E2=80=99s a small file, you can send it as an attachment.

GDB shows:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Core was generated by `/gnu/store/0m0vd873jp61lcm4xa3ljdgx381qa782-guile-3.=
0.2/bin/guile --no-auto-com'.
Program terminated with signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
#0  0x00007f90885ccc78 in ?? ()
[Current thread is 1 (LWP 845)]
(gdb) thread apply all bt

Thread 9 (LWP 853):
#0  0x00007f90884d90a4 in ?? ()
#1  0x0000000000000001 in ?? ()
#2  0x0000000000000001 in ?? ()
#3  0x00007f90840c9a30 in ?? ()
#4  0x00007f90840c95a0 in ?? ()
#5  0x00007f90840ca700 in ?? ()
#6  0x00007f90885ac067 in ?? ()
#7  0x00007f90845efa80 in ?? ()
#8  0x00007f90884fed94 in ?? ()
#9  0x0000000000000001 in ?? ()
#10 0x00007f90840c95a0 in ?? ()
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

That means debugging info is lacking.  To address that, could you run:

  guix build $(guix gc --derivers /gnu/store/0m0vd873jp61lcm4xa3ljdgx381qa7=
82-guile-3.0.2)

and then:

  echo 'set debug-file-directory /gnu/store/9lg4gssswn2cwn54p6jjy6nld16ah79=
5-guile-3.0.2-debug/lib/debug' >> ~/.gdbinit

At that point, you can try again to run:

  gdb --core=3D./core

That will hopefully show more useful info.

Thanks in advance!

Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41715; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41715) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2020 05:54:41 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 12 01:54:41 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38740 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jjceH-0006eb-Ft
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 01:54:41 -0400
Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:34683)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jjceF-0006eL-RE
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 01:54:40 -0400
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
 by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A357B16005F
 for <41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 07:54:33 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
 t=1591941273; bh=Ph4+KQFrgn4+6OGkk9p/4AXhDYNtaEjzbWsH0FQxHpU=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From;
 b=GX7cyBNtxCAQcvpylRfqnMmicE0ITXq8mI4G7ObxFhaMNSuXgibq9bhb2d8mdx/Q7
 V8sgPWfOAOUrYuZCq8oMuHAgSYM8DY0qAF4izhZpyniWDST9rLpsk07OPjcTw+/V74
 gB0QyT6sVk6MXCz9kEDsdWA9YsSFHzJnMTP3mteq2eQg3AhA+36U3Y1ergQz5cTz0Z
 xMeU7PNVyJnZQOtci/Eleut/ag6dQvwQ49C2PYoVd+J8XfyOKXqLV0sGYcytDa9Gz1
 nqRrPMIg945OEMNThhuEsySZxyS9D+jLAUuUPps/dCvlQBC1uZpoHRYZcIlT6Ya5C4
 b9W5sCGSrkaVw==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 49jqgF01G6z9rxP;
 Fri, 12 Jun 2020 07:54:32 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 07:54:32 +0200
From: o.rojon@HIDDEN
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#41715: The program
 '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the
 derivation for guix
In-Reply-To: <87mu5cia64.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <54320f33124f0122ed56fb7e15b17ae4@HIDDEN>
 <87sgfa7g9r.fsf@HIDDEN> <6a6c6f638f0a33ec39b9e70843090299@HIDDEN>
 <87mu5h1noe.fsf@HIDDEN> <97da9eb75628d48de3b8ef4abb212bca@HIDDEN>
 <87pnaasloq.fsf@HIDDEN> <e1fcc66a4a7d5f89e7135e0459ead070@HIDDEN>
 <87mu5cia64.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <47c4e596596303893a847212ffa4da9b@HIDDEN>
X-Sender: o.rojon@HIDDEN
User-Agent: Posteo Webmail
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41715
Cc: 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hej Ludo,

crazy, I wouldn't have thought it would go as deep as gdb as quickly ;-)

I followed the steps you mentioned, the results you find here:=20
https://www.mediafire.com/file/g5yz8f3pput8f3w/gdb-output/file  . The=20
only part I omitted from the gdb output is the first lines mentioned the=20
license. (Will look at IPFS, maybe next time :))

If you need anything else, dont hesitate to specify. Also, should a=20
reinstall become necessary, that would be annoying but not the end of=20
the world. So if we hit a dead end thats fine by me.

Thanks a lot for your help. So far, I received only good from the guix=20
community :)

Greetings,
Olivier

On 09.06.2020 16:30, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> o.rojon@HIDDEN skribis:
>=20
>> here is the log uploaded on mediafire:
>> http://www.mediafire.com/file/ldqoi68y88rzrn9/log.bz2/file (note that
>> if you can recommend another uploading service, feel free to!)
>=20
> I don=E2=80=99t know, maybe you could run IPFS.
>=20
> The log reads:
>=20
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> clone(child_stack=3DNULL,
> flags=3DCLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD,
> child_tidptr=3D0x7f3d44cfee50) =3D 1498
> close(17)                               =3D 0
> read(16, "", 1)                         =3D 0
> close(16)                               =3D 0
> wait4(1498, [{WIFSIGNALED(s) && WTERMSIG(s) =3D=3D SIGBUS}], 0, NULL) =3D=
=20
> 1498
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>=20
> =E2=80=A6 which means the =E2=80=98compute-guix-derivation=E2=80=99 proce=
ss crashed with=20
> SIGBUS.
>=20
> Could you run:
>=20
>   ulimit -c unlimited
>   guix pull
>=20
> That should fail again, but this time there should be a =E2=80=98core=E2=
=80=99 file in
> the current directory (or =E2=80=98core.=E2=80=99 followed by digits).
>=20
> Then you can run:
>=20
>   gdb --core=3D./core
>=20
> and at the GDB prompt, type:
>=20
>   thread apply all bt
>=20
> Could you let me know what that returns?
>=20
> Thanks,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41715; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41715) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2020 14:30:39 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 09 10:30:39 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60536 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jifGx-0002PJ-H4
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:30:39 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48796)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1jifGv-0002P3-Dr
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:30:37 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42423)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jifGq-0002SN-1y; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:30:32 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=60682 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jifGo-0001fr-Hz; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:30:31 -0400
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: o.rojon@HIDDEN
Subject: Re: bug#41715: The program
 '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the derivation
 for guix
References: <54320f33124f0122ed56fb7e15b17ae4@HIDDEN>
 <87sgfa7g9r.fsf@HIDDEN> <6a6c6f638f0a33ec39b9e70843090299@HIDDEN>
 <87mu5h1noe.fsf@HIDDEN> <97da9eb75628d48de3b8ef4abb212bca@HIDDEN>
 <87pnaasloq.fsf@HIDDEN> <e1fcc66a4a7d5f89e7135e0459ead070@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 22 Prairial an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:30:27 +0200
In-Reply-To: <e1fcc66a4a7d5f89e7135e0459ead070@HIDDEN> (o. rojon's message
 of "Mon, 08 Jun 2020 16:55:34 +0200")
Message-ID: <87mu5cia64.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41715
Cc: 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi,

o.rojon@HIDDEN skribis:

> here is the log uploaded on mediafire:
> http://www.mediafire.com/file/ldqoi68y88rzrn9/log.bz2/file (note that
> if you can recommend another uploading service, feel free to!)

I don=E2=80=99t know, maybe you could run IPFS.

The log reads:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
clone(child_stack=3DNULL, flags=3DCLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|S=
IGCHLD, child_tidptr=3D0x7f3d44cfee50) =3D 1498
close(17)                               =3D 0
read(16, "", 1)                         =3D 0
close(16)                               =3D 0
wait4(1498, [{WIFSIGNALED(s) && WTERMSIG(s) =3D=3D SIGBUS}], 0, NULL) =3D 1=
498
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

=E2=80=A6 which means the =E2=80=98compute-guix-derivation=E2=80=99 process=
 crashed with SIGBUS.

Could you run:

  ulimit -c unlimited
  guix pull

That should fail again, but this time there should be a =E2=80=98core=E2=80=
=99 file in
the current directory (or =E2=80=98core.=E2=80=99 followed by digits).

Then you can run:

  gdb --core=3D./core

and at the GDB prompt, type:

  thread apply all bt

Could you let me know what that returns?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41715; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41715) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jun 2020 14:55:44 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 08 10:55:43 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57630 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jiJBf-0004gZ-NZ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 10:55:43 -0400
Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:58529)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jiJBd-0004gL-SS
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 10:55:42 -0400
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
 by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 895FB2400FE
 for <41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon,  8 Jun 2020 16:55:35 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
 t=1591628135; bh=Su6d7NHWHqsIZoroFbznlGyMNOO9n4mUmw7sEr8+U7Y=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From;
 b=isUOE0apzQJBwSn1sowqGmWogYpOSJORmnzFdwbfGVNQf+Dj3XZNpEb8EKgPbt8g8
 xeWC/aqHG4MwJ9x6bN892KjGvJraGdUCLdkHnpFkkt4cohHhKHGUMSHn3so3AkiOuK
 ywDoZXMYRkRMJYHohT9aN8e8fiUwxlfHkKHGt/ZxiEOR4Zu8OkVNYRAeSyqNljtYZF
 ZUcoYZ31LhP7Ra8lyvirDL2DT4Dqsdd/t493etrv3+GJMa6gSqGfVAkdTiD0aFyviM
 HPzXkNyqPXdVcPqB2fg4Rck4mXtLKJ+kLELzvDMu9zEde0KzWKNMdQpcdGrfE7HAos
 nrDGAabwKYHhQ==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 49gbsM0ZJBz6tmN;
 Mon,  8 Jun 2020 16:55:34 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 16:55:34 +0200
From: o.rojon@HIDDEN
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#41715: The program
 '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the
 derivation for guix
In-Reply-To: <87pnaasloq.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <54320f33124f0122ed56fb7e15b17ae4@HIDDEN>
 <87sgfa7g9r.fsf@HIDDEN> <6a6c6f638f0a33ec39b9e70843090299@HIDDEN>
 <87mu5h1noe.fsf@HIDDEN> <97da9eb75628d48de3b8ef4abb212bca@HIDDEN>
 <87pnaasloq.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <e1fcc66a4a7d5f89e7135e0459ead070@HIDDEN>
X-Sender: o.rojon@HIDDEN
User-Agent: Posteo Webmail
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41715
Cc: 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi Ludo,

here is the log uploaded on mediafire:=20
http://www.mediafire.com/file/ldqoi68y88rzrn9/log.bz2/file (note that if=20
you can recommend another uploading service, feel free to!)

Since the log is in german, let me specify at least two of the recurrent=20
phrases in english:
"Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden" means "file or directory not=20
found"
"Die Ressource ist zur Zeit nicht verf=C3=BCgbar" means "Resource is=20
currently unavailable"

If there is other things that need be translated, dont hesitate to tell=20
me :)

Greetings,
Olivier

On 07.06.2020 21:47, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> o.rojon@HIDDEN skribis:
>=20
>> guix pull --roll-back did not solve the issue. The only thing I
>> believe to have changed is the "host version" portion of the error
>> message.
>=20
> OK, that=E2=80=99s expected.
>=20
>> 'which guix' actually points to
>> ~/.configu/guix/current/bin/guix. Should this command yield a
>> different value?
>=20
> No.
>=20
>> I have actually not done anything regarding either guix-daemon or
>> offloading. The only things I did after the fresh install were a
>> reconfigure and passing a manifest file to 'guix package -m'.
>>=20
>> I may have misunderstood what Jakub wrote because I am unsure what a
>> transient failure is. The portion I believe to have understood
>> essentially says "try again later and it should work".
>=20
> Yes, that=E2=80=99s the essence of it.  :-)
>=20
>> I found the logs of 'compute-guix-derivation', but I was unable to see
>> anything meaningful opening the .drv.bz2 file in emacs. Am I doing
>> something wrong?
>=20
> Could you try this:
>=20
>   strace -s 500 -o log guix pull
>=20
> and post the =E2=80=98log=E2=80=99 file, compressed, somewhere?
>=20
> Thanks,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41715; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41715) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jun 2020 19:47:13 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 07 15:47:13 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54972 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ji1GC-0003Eo-Ph
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 15:47:12 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51820)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1ji1GB-0003Ea-6y
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 15:47:11 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57154)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ji1G5-0004vT-2D; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 15:47:05 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=40086 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ji1G3-0005LC-25; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 15:47:03 -0400
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: o.rojon@HIDDEN
Subject: Re: bug#41715: The program
 '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the derivation
 for guix
References: <54320f33124f0122ed56fb7e15b17ae4@HIDDEN>
 <87sgfa7g9r.fsf@HIDDEN> <6a6c6f638f0a33ec39b9e70843090299@HIDDEN>
 <87mu5h1noe.fsf@HIDDEN> <97da9eb75628d48de3b8ef4abb212bca@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 20 Prairial an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 21:47:01 +0200
In-Reply-To: <97da9eb75628d48de3b8ef4abb212bca@HIDDEN> (o. rojon's message
 of "Sat, 06 Jun 2020 02:57:24 +0200")
Message-ID: <87pnaasloq.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41715
Cc: 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

Hi,

o.rojon@HIDDEN skribis:

> guix pull --roll-back did not solve the issue. The only thing I
> believe to have changed is the "host version" portion of the error
> message.

OK, that=E2=80=99s expected.

> 'which guix' actually points to
> ~/.configu/guix/current/bin/guix. Should this command yield a
> different value?

No.

> I have actually not done anything regarding either guix-daemon or
> offloading. The only things I did after the fresh install were a
> reconfigure and passing a manifest file to 'guix package -m'.
>
> I may have misunderstood what Jakub wrote because I am unsure what a
> transient failure is. The portion I believe to have understood
> essentially says "try again later and it should work".

Yes, that=E2=80=99s the essence of it.  :-)

> I found the logs of 'compute-guix-derivation', but I was unable to see
> anything meaningful opening the .drv.bz2 file in emacs. Am I doing
> something wrong?

Could you try this:

  strace -s 500 -o log guix pull

and post the =E2=80=98log=E2=80=99 file, compressed, somewhere?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41715; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41715) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2020 00:57:39 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 05 20:57:39 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50398 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jhN9Q-0003r1-MI
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:57:39 -0400
Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:35287)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jhN9P-0003qn-22
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:57:31 -0400
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
 by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34FF2400FC
 for <41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat,  6 Jun 2020 02:57:24 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
 t=1591405044; bh=oDva69Btb/lcVxIvjC3OUCDUOMF9u92ny69ftvIaPPs=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From;
 b=fcN4j5TRgVjdPa5Tw9MonuNPow/bSQGAXDbsENyqXBupzQ72MtdnDu2M1CFcQwKhK
 KefAF9JawlNOi7QhU+CN4jfJ5brP+JFjctxIEXP+l4Y4gdow1r9iRjGxywi7Szlf5J
 YLcDK1XxbzDc2Pm8p+JWd0zEHfJ2Ek54zwnYwmJ6AWCU5/R0BvKe1ot8F/abxosPKf
 6GJ4Il6b3JekqXLef0+xoO27Ba7ow37nNIDjgfP7eO1g3dgDnazekbjXOYxiDc2CGP
 E3/gBDGlM+x4aK4u/3/DJkEiWRpWUPTj7m6kqv/VxERNkZ/mKl9fdUGZC8SxpQYjn/
 sW9+h9A5DA7aQ==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 49f1M820tcz9rxK;
 Sat,  6 Jun 2020 02:57:24 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 02:57:24 +0200
From: o.rojon@HIDDEN
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#41715: The program
 '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the
 derivation for guix
In-Reply-To: <87mu5h1noe.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <54320f33124f0122ed56fb7e15b17ae4@HIDDEN>
 <87sgfa7g9r.fsf@HIDDEN> <6a6c6f638f0a33ec39b9e70843090299@HIDDEN>
 <87mu5h1noe.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <97da9eb75628d48de3b8ef4abb212bca@HIDDEN>
X-Sender: o.rojon@HIDDEN
User-Agent: Posteo Webmail
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41715
Cc: 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi Ludo,

guix pull --roll-back did not solve the issue. The only thing I believe=20
to have changed is the "host version" portion of the error message.

'which guix' actually points to ~/.configu/guix/current/bin/guix. Should=20
this command yield a different value?

I have actually not done anything regarding either guix-daemon or=20
offloading. The only things I did after the fresh install were a=20
reconfigure and passing a manifest file to 'guix package -m'.

I may have misunderstood what Jakub wrote because I am unsure what a=20
transient failure is. The portion I believe to have understood=20
essentially says "try again later and it should work".

I found the logs of 'compute-guix-derivation', but I was unable to see=20
anything meaningful opening the .drv.bz2 file in emacs. Am I doing=20
something wrong?

I wont be on my guix machine for some days now but appreciate pointers.=20
:)

Olivier

On 05.06.2020 18:29, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> o.rojon@HIDDEN skribis:
>=20
>> Just to follow up: a roll-back does NOT solve the issue.
>>=20
>> What I have tried:
>> 1) roll-back via guix system roll-back (to the generation that was
>> created upon system installation)
>> 2) roll-back via guix package --roll-back (same)
>> 3) (1) + (2) combined
>> 4) boot into the generation created upon system installation.
>>=20
>> In none of these cases was I able to run 'guix pull'.
>=20
> Thanks for testing this.
>=20
> Note that, if =E2=80=9Cwhich guix=E2=80=9D returns ~/.config/guix/current=
/bin/guix,=20
> then
> none of the rollbacks above can have any effect.  What could make a
> difference (but again, that would seem weird to me) is:
>=20
>   guix pull --roll-back
>=20
> Are you passing extra options to guix-daemon, such as
> =E2=80=98--cache-failures=E2=80=99?  Or did you enable offloading?
>=20
> It could also be that a transient failure is causing a silent build
> failure somewhere, as Jakub suggests.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>=20
> PS: Please keep the bug address Cc=E2=80=99d.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41715; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41715) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2020 16:29:30 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 05 12:29:30 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49720 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jhFDm-0001t1-Id
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:29:30 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52414)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1jhFDk-0001sn-FW
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:29:29 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41010)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jhFDf-0005Af-7n; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:29:23 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=50316 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jhFDe-0006rh-Rl; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:29:23 -0400
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: o.rojon@HIDDEN
Subject: Re: bug#41715: The program
 '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the derivation
 for guix
References: <54320f33124f0122ed56fb7e15b17ae4@HIDDEN>
 <87sgfa7g9r.fsf@HIDDEN> <6a6c6f638f0a33ec39b9e70843090299@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 18 Prairial an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 18:29:21 +0200
In-Reply-To: <6a6c6f638f0a33ec39b9e70843090299@HIDDEN> (o. rojon's message
 of "Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:26:00 +0200")
Message-ID: <87mu5h1noe.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41715
Cc: 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi,

o.rojon@HIDDEN skribis:

> Just to follow up: a roll-back does NOT solve the issue.
>
> What I have tried:
> 1) roll-back via guix system roll-back (to the generation that was
> created upon system installation)
> 2) roll-back via guix package --roll-back (same)
> 3) (1) + (2) combined
> 4) boot into the generation created upon system installation.
>
> In none of these cases was I able to run 'guix pull'.

Thanks for testing this.

Note that, if =E2=80=9Cwhich guix=E2=80=9D returns ~/.config/guix/current/b=
in/guix, then
none of the rollbacks above can have any effect.  What could make a
difference (but again, that would seem weird to me) is:

  guix pull --roll-back

Are you passing extra options to guix-daemon, such as
=E2=80=98--cache-failures=E2=80=99?  Or did you enable offloading?

It could also be that a transient failure is causing a silent build
failure somewhere, as Jakub suggests.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.

PS: Please keep the bug address Cc=E2=80=99d.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41715; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41715) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2020 16:26:17 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 05 12:26:17 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49714 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jhFAf-0001od-1R
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:26:17 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51954)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jhFAd-0001oQ-Ey
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:26:15 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40813)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jhFAX-0004cH-Qx
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:26:09 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=50314 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jhFAX-0008AB-4U
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:26:09 -0400
Resent-To: 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 18:26:08 +0200
Resent-Message-ID: <87zh9h1ntr.fsf@HIDDEN>
Received: from solo.fdn.fr ([unix socket])
 by solo (Cyrus 2.5.10-Debian-2.5.10-3.2) with LMTPA;
 Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:26:50 +0200
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.4
Received: by solo.fdn.fr (Postfix)
 id C39E7D0E5D; Fri,  5 Jun 2020 10:26:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by solo.fdn.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC519D0E52
 for <ludovic.courtes@HIDDEN>; Fri,  5 Jun 2020 10:26:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48812)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jh7ge-0007EA-3U
 for ludovic.courtes@HIDDEN; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 04:26:48 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60858)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jh7gd-0005r6-4M
 for ludo@HIDDEN; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 04:26:47 -0400
Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:44173)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jh7gb-0007Dy-9S for ludo@HIDDEN; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 04:26:46 -0400
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
 by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA532400FC
 for <ludo@HIDDEN>; Fri,  5 Jun 2020 10:26:41 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
 t=1591345601; bh=nlRPf+jl2+F8SFYakRn0h5jTjrrmzIxPkyOUKhiCRI8=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
 b=YoLAuF02rt3bfFulQ8Qi7Y+y8Xib6gK/6SYZ+0x4Ie6XVM5LSYSyCC/d2dAgViiCU
 AnK+5T/Nv4FY6M6uZCwVCWCc/68hLMwYu6pgkJtxlUNTzdwkI+aF2wiNff+Ux05ptH
 yPO0FAE+QNidVX5GifzfHzO60+lAowJCtAdDkND/FlguN+pk+CnMGWIHUE1KRRA3UI
 8/ueX7Z6W7CcSWUATIWFiutOVVVnZ6I+KHNu3iTvi1JeLjV4P/BU1NsU2NJr48oSVG
 0aB3imUflwvk2xJdvdZc4uA1tbcRKQysSQ/c8g2L3Rs47DG6H4WMnblzH6Z3PXU9gD
 ryu0uZnDlhK7w==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 49dbMD49kdz9s0w
 for <ludo@HIDDEN>; Fri,  5 Jun 2020 10:26:00 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:26:00 +0200
From: o.rojon@HIDDEN
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#41715: The program
 '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the
 derivation for guix
In-Reply-To: <87sgfa7g9r.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <54320f33124f0122ed56fb7e15b17ae4@HIDDEN>
 <87sgfa7g9r.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <6a6c6f638f0a33ec39b9e70843090299@HIDDEN>
X-Sender: o.rojon@HIDDEN
User-Agent: Posteo Webmail
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=o.rojon@HIDDEN;
 helo=mout02.posteo.de
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/05 04:26:42
X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS   = Linux 3.11 and newer
X-Spam_score_int: -43
X-Spam_score: -4.4
X-Spam_bar: ----
X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41715
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

Just to follow up: a roll-back does NOT solve the issue.

What I have tried:
1) roll-back via guix system roll-back (to the generation that was=20
created upon system installation)
2) roll-back via guix package --roll-back (same)
3) (1) + (2) combined
4) boot into the generation created upon system installation.

In none of these cases was I able to run 'guix pull'.

Does it help for you to see my system configuration file? Because there=20
isnt much in there apart from very basic packages (ncdu, recutils, some=20
fonts, some icon packs) and a few services (GDM->SDDM login manager,=20
MATE desktop, TOR). Also note that before the re-installation, I have=20
not experienced problems with this configuration (MINUS mate desktop and=20
TOR).

On 04.06.2020 22:00, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> o.rojon@HIDDEN skribis:
>=20
>> on a freshly installed and reconfigured machine, I receive the
>> following error:
>> # guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
>> '/gnu/store/kpxami25fi3mrxb37sfbbx2s366chpk5-compute-guix-derivation'
>> # failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
>> "790ada9168e0689c1c4607c61cdc1d2dbc327abf"; system: "x86_64-linux";
>> # host version: "398ec3c1e265a3f89ed07987f33b264db82e4080";
>> pull-version: 1).
>=20
> Is there more info above these lines?
>=20
> I tried to reproduce it with:
>=20
>   guix time-machine --commit=3D398ec3c1e265a3f89ed07987f33b264db82e4080 \
>     -- time-machine --commit=3D790ada9168e0689c1c4607c61cdc1d2dbc327abf \
>     -- describe
>=20
> but it works for me.
>=20
>> I'm not entirely sure if, in this case, it is about RAM, as has been
>> mentioned in this thread: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/41710 . I do
>> have 24gb ram, but currently a small swap file, but that might be
>> totally unrelated.
>=20
> 24=C2=A0GiB is more than enough.
>=20
> Is the problem reproducible if you try again now?
>=20
> Thanks for reporting the issue,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41715; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41715) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2020 16:22:30 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 05 12:22:30 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49704 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jhF70-0001if-5g
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:22:30 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51374)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jhF6y-0001iS-O6
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:22:29 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40693)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jhF6t-0003OL-HC
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:22:23 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=50284 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jhF6s-0007gq-3v
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:22:22 -0400
Resent-To: 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 18:22:21 +0200
Resent-Message-ID: <874krp32ki.fsf@HIDDEN>
Received: from solo.fdn.fr ([unix socket])
 by solo (Cyrus 2.5.10-Debian-2.5.10-3.2) with LMTPA;
 Fri, 05 Jun 2020 07:54:14 +0200
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.4
Received: by solo.fdn.fr (Postfix)
 id CB88CD0E5D; Fri,  5 Jun 2020 07:54:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by solo.fdn.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2DF9D0E52
 for <ludovic.courtes@HIDDEN>; Fri,  5 Jun 2020 07:54:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47385)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jh5Iz-0001rg-AZ
 for ludovic.courtes@HIDDEN; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 01:54:13 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46980)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jh5Iz-0007UA-04
 for ludo@HIDDEN; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 01:54:13 -0400
Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:60627)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jh5Ix-0001rG-E4 for ludo@HIDDEN; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 01:54:12 -0400
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
 by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24FE82400FB
 for <ludo@HIDDEN>; Fri,  5 Jun 2020 07:54:07 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
 t=1591336447; bh=l1zehOMA2QMuKTPpEv8BCYIKvi+nHUyaFwFUbP+K5Tk=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
 b=PDrpE8KIXspgSJYXYBm5hgfnx6ZS1q8rJWbl2RFPAcDK/k79fiILpHadCAkK+k/Z1
 rd6Qk0hHRmapIPKBZkhPspZKBToGxioqNvYswJ3cjNq5Lv2gy6KJNvCEcP+uXFcKlj
 xP+1lZKTN1RY9S/u3zmsL3kYAHUFazIIRelpAU1pDM6s9cfivNNH/iv4SbO5LjN+wb
 vPmUElSm950bl9ASTlnCxdzTf24t0l87wt4UphxZ4q62VWhf9+SMx68P2YvxYt1b9m
 U5gyuJwwMbzuOu+QEvTCxZ4eYIprZNk9fLPxe0FOiYnb+AHWj7bdP1IN2OtVFXwste
 uSnWO00gx2bSg==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 49dWzy4BKNz9rxW
 for <ludo@HIDDEN>; Fri,  5 Jun 2020 07:54:06 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 07:54:06 +0200
From: o.rojon@HIDDEN
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#41715: The program
 '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the
 derivation for guix
In-Reply-To: <87sgfa7g9r.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <54320f33124f0122ed56fb7e15b17ae4@HIDDEN>
 <87sgfa7g9r.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <3b6810281efe6055d52232975fd44c91@HIDDEN>
X-Sender: o.rojon@HIDDEN
User-Agent: Posteo Webmail
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=o.rojon@HIDDEN;
 helo=mout02.posteo.de
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/05 01:54:07
X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS   = Linux 3.11 and newer
X-Spam_score_int: -43
X-Spam_score: -4.4
X-Spam_bar: ----
X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41715
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

Hej Ludo,

thanks for the quick reply!

I just tried to pull again and yielded the same result.

Actually, no, there is nothing above these lines. Yet, let me copy/paste=20
the whole command in/output. It is in german but I guess the steps are=20
so common by now that it shouldnt be a problem to understand :)

# user@computer ~$ guix pull
# Kanal =E2=80=9Eguix=E2=80=9C wird vom Git-Repository auf=20
=E2=80=9Ehttps://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git=E2=80=9C aktualisiert =
=E2=80=A6
# Von diesen Kan=C3=A4len wird erstellt:
#   guix      https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git   0713929
# guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program=20
'/gnu/store/kpxami25fi3mrxb37sfbbx2s366chpk5-compute-guix-derivation'
# failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:=20
"0713929685d2fd1970df1b1ce238ee7bd6e892f8"; system: "x86_64-linux";
# host version: "398ec3c1e265a3f89ed07987f33b264db82e4080";=20
pull-version: 1).
# Please report it by email to <bug-guix@HIDDEN>.

Also, now I am sure it has nothing to do with ram. Apart from the=20
already available ram, I resized my swapdevice.

Is there anything else I should test? One thing I could do is to=20
roll-back (I did a upgrade/reconfigure cycle after installation). Should=20
I do that and then pull again?

Greetings,
Olivier

On 04.06.2020 22:00, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> o.rojon@HIDDEN skribis:
>=20
>> on a freshly installed and reconfigured machine, I receive the
>> following error:
>> # guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
>> '/gnu/store/kpxami25fi3mrxb37sfbbx2s366chpk5-compute-guix-derivation'
>> # failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
>> "790ada9168e0689c1c4607c61cdc1d2dbc327abf"; system: "x86_64-linux";
>> # host version: "398ec3c1e265a3f89ed07987f33b264db82e4080";
>> pull-version: 1).
>=20
> Is there more info above these lines?
>=20
> I tried to reproduce it with:
>=20
>   guix time-machine --commit=3D398ec3c1e265a3f89ed07987f33b264db82e4080 \
>     -- time-machine --commit=3D790ada9168e0689c1c4607c61cdc1d2dbc327abf \
>     -- describe
>=20
> but it works for me.
>=20
>> I'm not entirely sure if, in this case, it is about RAM, as has been
>> mentioned in this thread: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/41710 . I do
>> have 24gb ram, but currently a small swap file, but that might be
>> totally unrelated.
>=20
> 24=C2=A0GiB is more than enough.
>=20
> Is the problem reproducible if you try again now?
>=20
> Thanks for reporting the issue,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41715; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41715) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2020 22:15:40 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 04 18:15:40 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47644 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jgy9D-0004It-UM
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 18:15:40 -0400
Received: from pat.zlotemysli.pl ([37.59.186.212]:55288)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <kuba@HIDDEN>) id 1jgy9C-0004Ik-GG
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 18:15:39 -0400
Received: (qmail 29772 invoked by uid 1009); 5 Jun 2020 00:15:36 +0200
Received: from 188.123.215.55 (kuba@HIDDEN@188.123.215.55) by
 pat.zlotemysli.pl (envelope-from <kuba@HIDDEN>,
 uid 1002) with qmail-scanner-2.08st 
 (clamdscan: 0.98.6/25832. spamassassin: 3.4.0. perlscan: 2.08st.  
 Clear:RC:1(188.123.215.55):. 
 Processed in 0.03808 secs); 04 Jun 2020 22:15:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gravity) (kuba@HIDDEN@188.123.215.55)
 by pat.zlotemysli.pl with SMTP; 5 Jun 2020 00:15:36 +0200
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 00:15:34 +0200
From: Jakub =?utf-8?B?S8SFZHppb8WCa2E=?= <kuba@HIDDEN>
To: 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: The program '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed
 to compute the derivation for guix
Message-ID: <20200604221534.ctileqxszheqs22b@gravity>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cz2ecnuaxjzw2kz6"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41715
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)


--cz2ecnuaxjzw2kz6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

I encountered a similar error message today, but it worked fine after
retrying. After digging around in /var/log/guix/drvs, I found these
lines in an appropriately-timestamped log file:

substitute: guix substitute: warning: ci.guix.gnu.org: connection failed: C=
onnection timed out
@ build-started /gnu/store/klyq05c1q8jzwnwrlmvy4ma6m2h6hbk0-compute-guix-de=
rivation.drv - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/kl//yq05c1q8jzwnwrlmvy4ma6m2=
h6hbk0-compute-guix-derivation.drv.bz2 3907994
@ build-succeeded /gnu/store/klyq05c1q8jzwnwrlmvy4ma6m2h6hbk0-compute-guix-=
derivation.drv -

I do recall seeing the Connection timed out message, I'd even say it's
probably the reason why I decided to retry the pull without much
investigation.

Regards,
Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka

--cz2ecnuaxjzw2kz6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=QACt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cz2ecnuaxjzw2kz6--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41715; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 41715) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2020 20:00:44 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 04 16:00:44 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47522 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jgw2e-00016g-0l
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:00:44 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34660)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1jgw2b-00016T-Vz
 for 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:00:42 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39465)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jgw2V-0001Sk-IU; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:00:35 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=46262 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jgw2U-0007iQ-8D; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:00:35 -0400
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: o.rojon@HIDDEN
Subject: Re: bug#41715: The program
 '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the derivation
 for guix
References: <54320f33124f0122ed56fb7e15b17ae4@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 22:00:32 +0200
In-Reply-To: <54320f33124f0122ed56fb7e15b17ae4@HIDDEN> (o. rojon's message
 of "Thu, 04 Jun 2020 21:12:45 +0200")
Message-ID: <87sgfa7g9r.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41715
Cc: 41715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hello,

o.rojon@HIDDEN skribis:

> on a freshly installed and reconfigured machine, I receive the
> following error:
> # guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
> '/gnu/store/kpxami25fi3mrxb37sfbbx2s366chpk5-compute-guix-derivation'
> # failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
> "790ada9168e0689c1c4607c61cdc1d2dbc327abf"; system: "x86_64-linux";
> # host version: "398ec3c1e265a3f89ed07987f33b264db82e4080";
> pull-version: 1).

Is there more info above these lines?

I tried to reproduce it with:

  guix time-machine --commit=3D398ec3c1e265a3f89ed07987f33b264db82e4080 \
    -- time-machine --commit=3D790ada9168e0689c1c4607c61cdc1d2dbc327abf \
    -- describe

but it works for me.

> I'm not entirely sure if, in this case, it is about RAM, as has been
> mentioned in this thread: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/41710 . I do
> have 24gb ram, but currently a small swap file, but that might be
> totally unrelated.

24=C2=A0GiB is more than enough.

Is the problem reproducible if you try again now?

Thanks for reporting the issue,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41715; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2020 19:12:53 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 04 15:12:53 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47485 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jgvIL-0008G7-E7
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 15:12:53 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47752)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>) id 1jgvIK-0008G0-Ck
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 15:12:52 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42986)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jgvIK-0006kT-6Y
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 15:12:52 -0400
Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:38111)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <o.rojon@HIDDEN>)
 id 1jgvIH-0007vm-Mw
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 15:12:51 -0400
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
 by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED814160061
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Thu,  4 Jun 2020 21:12:45 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
 t=1591297966; bh=X83Ub+Ma2zcfZhwP19XngCQFXbJSuZwZvKLZH0s65ZA=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
 b=T3LGWme/vRGyrieXzWrZJ+cisI59F9KGyWE3nq0tTkEhiG9Wrpqql/vo+tckESU6p
 sj8lgu+wnezZs/E8d/EgAYsa+hmn6mtEOM2CKHXx/2mKkNceia1+6fqS2G7NIjTqfE
 DlqOFYJQmZEtexGbTCcznYE0RPCtR07WKzLqx+NIG8Ru/VHqDae8B3e9Oi5UDtmo24
 ppIRzxUsE8xyNKF8fcA6JngUVEm7AEhuSHGzLDi0Ndbvn0e8DEbaOvcDf2oa+le99F
 bM8QWhEVy3g2Tm+8g5G6gV1av71tkpTDtvTLOoLSWRHaAb1vLJBaDKI3JFSC5jUItC
 g4nv3uRnsgcZg==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 49dFlx498Tz9rxP
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Thu,  4 Jun 2020 21:12:45 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 21:12:45 +0200
From: o.rojon@HIDDEN
To: Bug guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Subject: The program '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to
 compute the derivation for guix
Message-ID: <54320f33124f0122ed56fb7e15b17ae4@HIDDEN>
X-Sender: o.rojon@HIDDEN
User-Agent: Posteo Webmail
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=o.rojon@HIDDEN;
 helo=mout01.posteo.de
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/04 15:04:40
X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS   = Linux 3.11 and newer
X-Spam_score_int: -43
X-Spam_score: -4.4
X-Spam_bar: ----
X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

Hello everyone,

on a freshly installed and reconfigured machine, I receive the following 
error:
# guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program 
'/gnu/store/kpxami25fi3mrxb37sfbbx2s366chpk5-compute-guix-derivation'
# failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: 
"790ada9168e0689c1c4607c61cdc1d2dbc327abf"; system: "x86_64-linux";
# host version: "398ec3c1e265a3f89ed07987f33b264db82e4080"; 
pull-version: 1).

I'm not entirely sure if, in this case, it is about RAM, as has been 
mentioned in this thread: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/41710 . I do have 
24gb ram, but currently a small swap file, but that might be totally 
unrelated.

If I can supply you with more information, please do not hesitate to 
specify how I can aid fixing the issue.

Have a good day,
Olivier




Acknowledgement sent to o.rojon@HIDDEN:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#41715; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:15:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.