GNU bug report logs - #42342
Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 42342 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 42342 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:53:51 +0200

Since commit 065a5ed677cdd1a65acae20f185d7c4bd23b1f2c wine and wine64
are upgraded to version 5.12.  The latter segfaults when doing anything
other than wine --help or wine --version.  (Try for example wine
regedit or winecfg).

The old 5.3 version continues to work after roll-back, and would
probably also work through inferiors.  I am currently checking previous
versions of wine64-staging with guix time-machine to see at which point
the error might have been introduced.  Until now, version 5.6 from
7b23a69d6b97c463cb1ef237931af11c22c19c67 fails with the following
output:

000b:fixme:winediag:__wine_start_process Wine Staging 5.6 is a testing
version containing experimental patches.
000b:fixme:winediag:__wine_start_process Please mention your exact
version when filing bug reports on winehq.org.
0009:err:module:LdrInitializeThunk "kernelbase.dll" failed to
initialize, aborting
0009:err:module:LdrInitializeThunk Initializing dlls for
L"C:\\windows\\system32\\winecfg.exe" failed, status c0000005

Regards, Leo

Message #8 received at 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:24:58 +0200

Interestingly enough 5.8 (ec16aaff5da9eb52b9d762531660f02e785d72de)
works without problems and there is no version packaged between it and
5.12/5.12.1 (wine64 and wine64-staging respectively).  Given this array
of results I'm pretty sure something goes wrong upstream.

I'll use inferiors as a local workaround for the time being and wait
for the problem to be fixed upstream.  I'll also look into 5.9 to 5.11
and perhaps provide a proper downgrade patch later on.

Regards, Leo

Message #11 received at 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org 
Subject: Re: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:01:48 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I can reproduce and indeed, staging 5.8 was working fine for me.

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #14 received at 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>,
 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Subject: Re: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:58:08 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Cc-ing to Tobias and Jakub.

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #17 received at 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
Subject: Re: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:22:43 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Pierre Neidhardt 写道：
> Cc-ing to Tobias and Jakub.

Thanks.  Have you reported this upstream?  It sounds similar to 
[0].

I'm against reverting wine-staging to a previous version though. 
If you want a stable wine, use wine.

Kind regards,

T G-R

[0]: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49380

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
Subject: Re: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:28:17 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> writes:

> [0]: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49380

This issue is about wine being unable to load a dll.
Here our wine segfaults, meaning it does not even get the  chance to
start before looking up the .dlls.

I'm suspecting an issue with us because I doubt that upstream would fail
to notice a completely unusable wine for 3 versions :p

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #23 received at 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
Subject: Re: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:41:43 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Pierre Neidhardt 写道：
> I'm suspecting an issue with us because I doubt that upstream 
> would fail
> to notice a completely unusable wine for 3 versions :p

What about me?

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
~/guix master λ git log gnu/packages/wine.scm | grep -B3 'gnu: 
wine-staging.*: Update'
Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>

   gnu: wine-staging: Update to 5.13.
--
Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>

   gnu: wine-staging: Update to 5.12.1.
--
Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>

   gnu: wine-staging-patchset-data: Update to 5.8.
--
Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>

   gnu: wine-staging-patchset-data: Update to 5.6.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Kind regards,

T G-R

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #26 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
Cc: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#42342: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:53:20 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Leo Prikler 写道：
> I'll use inferiors as a local workaround for the time being and 
> wait
> for the problem to be fixed upstream.  I'll also look into 5.9 
> to 5.11
> and perhaps provide a proper downgrade patch later on.

I admit to being a bit confused.  IIRC on #guix you reported that 
wine-staging was broken, not wine64-staging.  If you only want to 
downgrade the latter, that's all right by me, but I consider that 
one of the risks of using the staging branch to begin with.

Is there a reason you rely on staging, and the 64-bit version to 
boot?

Kind regards,

T G-R

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #32 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#42342: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:36:43 +0200

Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2020, 18:53 +0200 schrieb Tobias Geerinckx-Rice:
> Leo Prikler 写道：
> > I'll use inferiors as a local workaround for the time being and 
> > wait
> > for the problem to be fixed upstream.  I'll also look into 5.9 
> > to 5.11
> > and perhaps provide a proper downgrade patch later on.
> 
> I admit to being a bit confused.  IIRC on #guix you reported that 
> wine-staging was broken, not wine64-staging.  If you only want to 
> downgrade the latter, that's all right by me, but I consider that 
> one of the risks of using the staging branch to begin with.
> 
> Is there a reason you rely on staging, and the 64-bit version to 
> boot?
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> T G-R
I'm referring to the package "wine64-staging", which is on master.  I
may have been confused myself at the time I mentioned this in #guix,
but now I have tested this a bit more thoroughly.

For one, I've historically been using wine64, since (at least on Guix)
it works with both 32bit and 64bit software and I sometimes stumble
upon the latter.  As a result, I have a 64bit wine prefix and using
wine (or wine-staging) does not really work well with that.  I was able
to determine that plain wine is unaffected by running the same commands
on a machine with no existing prefix.  (Note, that regular wine64 still
fails with a fresh prefix.)  My experiments with wine64-staging were
solely meant as a way of finding the point at which wine64 fails, I
have no intent of actually using it for more than that.
I'm not quite sure, what exactly is at fault here.  It could be
upstream, or it could be the magic that we use to merge 32 and 64 bit
wine.

TL;DR: The affected packages are wine64 and wine64-staging, the latter
of which is broken beyond 5.8 (though 5.9 would work as well).  Since
this affects the 64bit version of wine specifically, we either have to
fix something in our build (not sure what) or desync wine and wine64
(same with -staging variants)

Regards,
Leo

Message #38 received at 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
Subject: Re: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:33:46 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Is it working for you?

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #41 received at 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Subject: Re: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:54:45 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 05:58:08PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Cc-ing to Tobias and Jakub.
> 
> -- 
> Pierre Neidhardt
> https://ambrevar.xyz/

Hi,

I can't reproduce this. I usually use 32-bit wine, so when it complained
about the bitness of the wineprefix, I did

$ mv ~/.wine ~/.wine32

then

$ guix environment --ad-hoc wine64 -- wine64 regedit

fired up the registry editor just fine.

Regards,
Jakub Kądziołka

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #44 received at 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
To: Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
Cc: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: bug#42342: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:37:29 +0200

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 04:54:45PM +0200, Jakub Kądziołka wrote:
> $ guix environment --ad-hoc wine64 -- wine64 regedit
> 
> fired up the registry editor just fine.


Indeed, when running pure 64-bit applications (like VLC’s 64-bit
Windows build), using wine64 instead of wine works fine.  I did not
even know this command existed.

It seems the issue is only with WoW64, i.e. supporting both 32-bit and
64-bit programs.  The synopsis of wine64 claims it’s a WoW64 version.

For example, the installer of VLC’s 32-bit or 64-bit Windows version
fails to run.  The installer is claimed by binutils’ objdump program
to be a 32-bit i386 executable instead of i386:x86-64.

Regards,
Florian

Message #47 received at 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>, Jakub
 Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
Cc: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#42342: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 15:38:58 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Now that wine stable is 5.12, I can't use start 32-bit applications
anymore.  I tried from a clean wine prefix and I only get this error:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Segmentation fault
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Here is the end of the strace:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/gnu/store/fhxjkwnv9w8a283f5qaiqq8hcmfmdap9-wine64-5.12/bin/../lib/wine32/wine/ntdll.dll.so", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/gnu/store/ajyl64ycr9vv51q2np68agwz2ad9lxqs-wine-5.12/lib/wine32/wine/ntdll.dll.so", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0P\360\302{4\0\0\0"..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0555, st_size=941360, ...}) = 0
mmap2(0x7bc00000, 864996, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) = 0x7bc00000
mmap2(0x7bc1e000, 487424, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x1e000) = 0x7bc1e000
mmap2(0x7bc95000, 200704, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x95000) = 0x7bc95000
mmap2(0x7bcc6000, 49152, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0xc5000) = 0x7bcc6000
mmap2(0x7bcd2000, 4836, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7bcd2000
close(3)                                = 0
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/gnu/store/ajyl64ycr9vv51q2np68agwz2ad9lxqs-wine-5.12/lib/wine32/libm.so.6", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/gnu/store/z4li262il798hbl0l1h1k3a5g7r6bffa-glibc-2.31/lib/libm.so.6", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0p\241\0\0004\0\0\0"..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0555, st_size=1109456, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 1048680, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) = 0x7eeff000
mmap2(0x7ef09000, 774144, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0xa000) = 0x7ef09000
mmap2(0x7efc6000, 229376, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0xc7000) = 0x7efc6000
mmap2(0x7effe000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0xfe000) = 0x7effe000
close(3)                                = 0
mprotect(0x7effe000, 4096, PROT_READ)   = 0
mprotect(0x7bc00000, 122880, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
mprotect(0x7bc1e000, 487424, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
mprotect(0x7bc95000, 200704, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
mprotect(0x7bc95000, 200704, PROT_READ) = 0
mprotect(0x7bc1e000, 487424, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0
mprotect(0x7bc00000, 122880, PROT_READ) = 0
mprotect(0x7bcc6000, 4096, PROT_READ)   = 0
--- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SEGV_MAPERR, si_addr=0x30} ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Segmentation fault
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Are 32-bit applications really working for some of you?

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #50 received at 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>, Jakub
 Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
Cc: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#42342: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 16:03:07 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

OK, I think I got it.  I had to have _both_ wine and wine64 (staging or
not) in my profile.

Previously, the "wine" executable (for 32-bit apps) used to work when
wine64 alone was in the profile.  Now it looks like we need both.  Any
idea what changed?

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #53 received at 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
Subject: Re: bug#42342: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2020 17:03:50 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 04:03:07PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> OK, I think I got it.  I had to have _both_ wine and wine64 (staging or
> not) in my profile.

Interesting. Perhaps we should merge the two packages, then? We'd need
to take care to make it work right on i686-linux, but I don't think
that's unsurmountable...

> Previously, the "wine" executable (for 32-bit apps) used to work when
> wine64 alone was in the profile.  Now it looks like we need both.  Any
> idea what changed?

Perhaps loading 32-bit programs with the wine64 wasn't supposed to work
in the first place, and we were relying on some implementation quirk?
Alternatively, cross-compiling from 64 to 32 bit is less tested by
upstream than compiling natively on 64 or 32 bit, and we're hitting an
upstream bug?

Regards,
Jakub Kądziołka

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #56 received at 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: 42342 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: PATCH [0/2] Update wine to 5.21
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:54:39 +0100

Hi Guix,

the following patch updates wine to version 5.21.  An attempt is also
made to fix #42342 by copying wine32 libraries into wine64.

Regards, Leo

Message #61 received at 42342-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: 42342-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging)
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 17:40:11 +0200

We are currently at wine 6.8/6.6-staging and from my own estimates my
fix proved useful.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.