GNU bug report logs - #42468
[PATCH] gnu: patchelf: Update to 0.11.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Michael Rohleder <mike <at> rohleder.de>

Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:36:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 42468 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 42468 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#42468; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:36:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Michael Rohleder <mike <at> rohleder.de>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:36:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Rohleder <mike <at> rohleder.de>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: patchelf: Update to 0.11.
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:35:12 +0200
[0001-gnu-patchelf-Update-to-0.11.patch (text/x-patch, inline)]
From c2d4b9b77fcc131294e6c2433b706e8401f8cc32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Rohleder <mike <at> rohleder.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:32:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: patchelf: Update to 0.11.

* gnu/packages/elf.scm (patchelf): Update to 0.11.
---
 gnu/packages/elf.scm | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/elf.scm b/gnu/packages/elf.scm
index 3aabc6e927..48558d5f14 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/elf.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/elf.scm
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 ;;; Copyright © 2018 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
 ;;; Copyright © 2018 Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
 ;;; Copyright © 2020 Mark Wielaard <mark <at> klomp.org>
+;;; Copyright © 2020 Michael Rohleder <mike <at> rohleder.de>
 ;;;
 ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
 ;;;
@@ -214,7 +215,7 @@ static analysis of the ELF binaries at hand.")
 (define-public patchelf
   (package
     (name "patchelf")
-    (version "0.10")
+    (version "0.11")
     (source (origin
              (method url-fetch)
              (uri (string-append
@@ -223,7 +224,7 @@ static analysis of the ELF binaries at hand.")
                    "/patchelf-" version ".tar.bz2"))
              (sha256
               (base32
-               "1wzwvnlyf853hw9zgqq5522bvf8gqadk8icgqa41a5n7593csw7n"))))
+               "16ms3ijcihb88j3x6cl8cbvhia72afmfcphczb9cfwr0gbc22chx"))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (arguments
      '(#:phases
-- 
2.27.0

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Reply sent to Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 21 Jul 2020 21:32:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Michael Rohleder <mike <at> rohleder.de>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 21 Jul 2020 21:32:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 42468-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>
To: Michael Rohleder <mike <at> rohleder.de>, 42468-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#42468] [PATCH] gnu: patchelf: Update to 0.11.
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 23:30:55 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Michael Rohleder <mike <at> rohleder.de> writes:

> * gnu/packages/elf.scm (patchelf): Update to 0.11.

Applied, thanks!

Btw, is your email signing key available somewhere?
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#42468; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 21 Jul 2020 23:45:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 42468-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>
To: Michael Rohleder <mike <at> rohleder.de>, 42468-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#42468: [PATCH] gnu: patchelf: Update to 0.11.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 01:44:02 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Michael Rohleder <mike <at> rohleder.de> writes:
>
>> * gnu/packages/elf.scm (patchelf): Update to 0.11.
>
> Applied, thanks!

Uh, I did not realize patchelf had 700+ dependencies (because it is used
for GHC), so I reverted this on 'master' and applied it on 'staging'
instead.

You can check the amount of rebuilds a package change will cause with
'guix refresh -l patchelf'.  It's good practice to use --subject-prefix
with 'PATCH staging' or 'PATCH core-updates' when emailing patches to
prevent overworked reviewers from breaking master on your behalf.  ;-)

Sorry for the mishap!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#42468; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 22 Jul 2020 01:31:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at 42468-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Rohleder <mike <at> rohleder.de>
To: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 42468-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#42468: [PATCH] gnu: patchelf: Update to 0.11.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 03:29:58 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Uh, I did not realize patchelf had 700+ dependencies (because it is used
> for GHC), so I reverted this on 'master' and applied it on 'staging'
> instead.
>
> You can check the amount of rebuilds a package change will cause with
> 'guix refresh -l patchelf'.  It's good practice to use --subject-prefix
> with 'PATCH staging' or 'PATCH core-updates' when emailing patches to
> prevent overworked reviewers from breaking master on your behalf.  ;-)
>
> Sorry for the mishap!
>

Uh, yes, sorry for your wasted time!

I checked the dependencies and wanted to send to staging, but before
sending I got distracted from realworld and then forgot the prefix in
the subject (and was offline till now)... Sorry! I have to be more
careful next time!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#42468; Package guix-patches. (Sat, 25 Jul 2020 14:44:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #19 received at 42468-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>
To: Michael Rohleder <mike <at> rohleder.de>
Cc: 42468-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#42468: [PATCH] gnu: patchelf: Update to 0.11.
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 16:43:00 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Michael Rohleder <mike <at> rohleder.de> writes:

> Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> Uh, I did not realize patchelf had 700+ dependencies (because it is used
>> for GHC), so I reverted this on 'master' and applied it on 'staging'
>> instead.
>>
>> You can check the amount of rebuilds a package change will cause with
>> 'guix refresh -l patchelf'.  It's good practice to use --subject-prefix
>> with 'PATCH staging' or 'PATCH core-updates' when emailing patches to
>> prevent overworked reviewers from breaking master on your behalf.  ;-)
>>
>> Sorry for the mishap!
>>
>
> Uh, yes, sorry for your wasted time!
>
> I checked the dependencies and wanted to send to staging, but before
> sending I got distracted from realworld and then forgot the prefix in
> the subject (and was offline till now)... Sorry! I have to be more
> careful next time!

No worries, we don't really expect contributors to know about these
things.  Sorry if my comment sounded angry, it was late.  ;-)

You've been around a while now, consider applying for commit access so
you can break master all by yourself, by the way!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 23 Aug 2020 11:24:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 218 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.