GNU bug report logs -
#42591
A minor error in the Elisp manual
Previous Next
Reported by: Jay Bingham <binghamjc <at> msn.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:07:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 42591 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 42591 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#42591
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:07:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Jay Bingham <binghamjc <at> msn.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:07:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
In the Elisp manual in section 9.2 Defining Symbols, the first sentence
in the third paragraph says:
In principle, you can assign a variable value to any symbol with setq,
whether not it has first been defined as a variable.
I believe that the word 'or' is missing between the words 'whether' and
'not', and that the sentence should read:
In principle, you can assign a variable value to any symbol with setq,
whether or not it has first been defined as a variable.
Sincerely,
J C Bingham
- Georgetown, TX USA -
___________________________
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Reply sent
to
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:44:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Jay Bingham <binghamjc <at> msn.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:44:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 42591-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Jay Bingham <binghamjc <at> msn.com> writes:
> In the Elisp manual in section 9.2 Defining Symbols, the first sentence in the third paragraph says:
>
> In principle, you can assign a variable value to any symbol with setq, whether not it has first been defined as a variable.
>
> I believe that the word 'or' is missing between the words 'whether' and 'not', and that the sentence should read:
>
> In principle, you can assign a variable value to any symbol with setq, whether or not it has first been defined as a variable.
Thanks, now fixed on the emacs-27 branch.
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:24:08 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 241 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.