GNU bug report logs - #42591
A minor error in the Elisp manual

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jay Bingham <binghamjc <at> msn.com>

Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:07:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 42591 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 42591 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#42591; Package emacs. (Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:07:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jay Bingham <binghamjc <at> msn.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:07:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jay Bingham <binghamjc <at> msn.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: A minor error in the Elisp manual
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:45:28 -0500
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
In the Elisp manual in section 9.2 Defining Symbols, the first sentence 
in the third paragraph says:

In principle, you can assign a variable value to any symbol with setq, 
whether not it has first been defined as a variable.

I believe that the word 'or' is missing between the words 'whether' and 
'not', and that the sentence should read:

In principle, you can assign a variable value to any symbol with setq, 
whether or not it has first been defined as a variable.

Sincerely,
J C Bingham
   - Georgetown, TX USA -
___________________________



-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Reply sent to Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>:
You have taken responsibility. (Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:44:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Jay Bingham <binghamjc <at> msn.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:44:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 42591-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
To: Jay Bingham <binghamjc <at> msn.com>
Cc: 42591-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#42591: A minor error in the Elisp manual
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:43:06 +0200
Jay Bingham <binghamjc <at> msn.com> writes:

> In the Elisp manual in section 9.2 Defining Symbols, the first sentence in the third paragraph says:
>
> In principle, you can assign a variable value to any symbol with setq, whether not it has first been defined as a variable.
>
> I believe that the word 'or' is missing between the words 'whether' and 'not', and that the sentence should read:
>
> In principle, you can assign a variable value to any symbol with setq, whether or not it has first been defined as a variable.

Thanks, now fixed on the emacs-27 branch.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:24:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 241 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.