GNU bug report logs - #42649
emacs-27.1-rc1 one failure on x86_64

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: noloader <at> gmail.com

Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 14:01:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed

Merged with 42533

Found in version 28.0.50

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 42649 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 42649 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#42649; Package emacs. (Sat, 01 Aug 2020 14:01:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to noloader <at> gmail.com:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 01 Aug 2020 14:01:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: emacs-27.1-rc1 one failure on x86_64
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 10:00:43 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Everyone,

I'm building emacs-27.1-rc1 on x86_64. I'm seeing one failure in check-doit.

HOME=/nonexistent EMACSLOADPATH= LC_ALL=C
EMACS_TEST_DIRECTORY=/home/jwalton/Build-Scripts/emacs-27.1/test
"../src/emacs" --module-assertions --no-init-file --no-site-file
--no-site-lisp -L ":."  \
  -l ert  -l src/xml-tests \
  --batch --eval '(ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit (quote (not (or (tag
:expensive-test) (tag :unstable)))))' > src/xml-tests.log 2>&1 || {
STAT=$?; cat src/xml-tests.log; exit $STAT; }
make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/jwalton/Build-Scripts/emacs-27.1/test'
Makefile:319: recipe for target 'check-doit' failed
make[2]: [check-doit] Error 2 (ignored)

SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
-----------------------
Files examined: 267
Ran 3885 tests, 3798 results as expected, 1 unexpected, 86 skipped
1 files contained unexpected results:
  lisp/cedet/srecode-utest-template.log
Makefile:319: recipe for target 'check-doit' failed
make[2]: *** [check-doit] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/jwalton/Build-Scripts/emacs-27.1/test'
Makefile:289: recipe for target 'check' failed
make[1]: *** [check] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jwalton/Build-Scripts/emacs-27.1/test'
Makefile:959: recipe for target 'check' failed
make: *** [check] Error 2

And:

emacs-27.1$ cat test/lisp/cedet/srecode-utest-template.log
Running 2 tests (2020-08-01 09:54:44-0400, selector `(not (or (tag
:expensive-test) (tag :unstable)))')
Test srecode-utest-project backtrace:
  signal(ert-test-failed (((should-not "Failed to load app specific te
  ert-fail(((should-not "Failed to load app specific template when ava
  #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode 0x155f75234c75>)()
  ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test
  ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name srecode-utest-project :documentation
  ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector (not (or (tag :expensi
  ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable))) #f(co
  ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable)))
  ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :un
  eval((ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit '(not (or (tag :expensive-test) (
  command-line-1(("-L" ":." "-l" "ert" "-l" "lisp/cedet/srecode-utest-
  command-line()
  normal-top-level()
Test srecode-utest-project condition:
    (ert-test-failed
     ((should-not "Failed to load app specific template when available.")
      :form "Failed to load app specific template when available."
:value "Failed to load app specific template when available."))
   FAILED  1/2  srecode-utest-project (0.061891 sec)
Warning: macro "COMMENT" was not found in the dictionary.
Warning: macro "INPUTNAME" was not found in the dictionary.
Warning: macro "INPUTNAME" was not found in the dictionary.
Warning: macro "COMMENT" was not found in the dictionary.
   passed  2/2  srecode-utest-template-output (0.005450 sec)

Ran 2 tests, 1 results as expected, 1 unexpected (2020-08-01
09:54:45-0400, 0.126763 sec)

1 unexpected results:
   FAILED  srecode-utest-project

jwalton <at> coffee:~/Build-Scripts/emacs-27.1$
[config.log.zip (application/zip, attachment)]
[test-suite.log.zip (application/zip, attachment)]

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#42649; Package emacs. (Sat, 01 Aug 2020 14:43:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 42649 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: noloader <at> gmail.com
Cc: 42649 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#42649: emacs-27.1-rc1 one failure on x86_64
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 17:41:47 +0300
> From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 10:00:43 -0400
> 
> 1 files contained unexpected results:
>   lisp/cedet/srecode-utest-template.log

Thanks.  I don't think this problem is important enough to affect the
release.  This test fails on Hydra as well (and on my system, FWIW).

Patches to fix the test are welcome, of course.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#42649; Package emacs. (Sat, 01 Aug 2020 16:55:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 42649 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Colin Baxter <m43cap <at> yandex.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: , noloader <at> gmail.com, 42649 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#42649: emacs-27.1-rc1 one failure on x86_64
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 17:54:34 +0100
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

    >> From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader <at> gmail.com> Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020
    >> 10:00:43 -0400
    >> 
    >> 1 files contained unexpected results:
    >> lisp/cedet/srecode-utest-template.log

    > Thanks.  I don't think this problem is important enough to affect
    > the release.  This test fails on Hydra as well (and on my system,
    > FWIW).

Debian seems to have no problems:

SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Files examined: 267
Ran 3890 tests, 3842 results as expected, 0 unexpected, 48 skipped

Debian 3.16.84-1 i686 GNU/Linux


Colin Baxter.




Forcibly Merged 42533 42649. Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 09 Aug 2020 21:44:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Added tag(s) fixed. Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:08:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug marked as fixed in version 28.1, send any further explanations to 42533 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Philipp <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com> Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:08:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 222 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.