GNU bug report logs -
#42681
[PATCH core-updates] gnu: bootstrap-gcc: Don't use CPATH search paths.
Previous Next
Reported by: Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 20:35:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 42681 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 42681 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#42681
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 02 Aug 2020 20:35:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 02 Aug 2020 20:35:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
This updates the bootstrap-gcc to use the same search path strategy as
the main compilers, making the bootstrap environment more similar across
architectures, and fixing the bootstrap path on non-x86 architectures
again.
This is a follow up to commit 7cde865f12dd67e55946a52a21103e71f447eced.
* gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm (%bootstrap-gcc)[native-search-paths]: Use
C_INCLUDE_PATH and CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH instead of CPATH.
---
Note: because I don't have any non-x86 machines on hand, I haven't
actually tested the patch yet.
Efraim, you have helped me investigate this with your ARM board, perhaps
you could test this patch?
Regards,
Jakub Kądziołka
gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm b/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm
index c39e60ec8b..fd6c2e099c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm
@@ -740,8 +740,11 @@ exec ~a/bin/.gcc-wrapped -B~a/lib \
"1m5miqkyng45l745n0sfafdpjkqv9225xf44jqkygwsipj2cv9ks")))))))))
(native-search-paths
(list (search-path-specification
- (variable "CPATH")
+ (variable "C_INCLUDE_PATH")
(files '("include")))
+ (search-path-specification
+ (variable "CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH")
+ (files '("include/c++" "include")))
(search-path-specification
(variable "LIBRARY_PATH")
(files '("lib" "lib64")))))
--
2.28.0
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#42681
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 03 Aug 2020 06:42:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 10:34:21PM +0200, Jakub Kądziołka wrote:
> This updates the bootstrap-gcc to use the same search path strategy as
> the main compilers, making the bootstrap environment more similar across
> architectures, and fixing the bootstrap path on non-x86 architectures
> again.
>
> This is a follow up to commit 7cde865f12dd67e55946a52a21103e71f447eced.
>
> * gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm (%bootstrap-gcc)[native-search-paths]: Use
> C_INCLUDE_PATH and CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH instead of CPATH.
> ---
>
> Note: because I don't have any non-x86 machines on hand, I haven't
> actually tested the patch yet.
>
> Efraim, you have helped me investigate this with your ARM board, perhaps
> you could test this patch?
>
> Regards,
> Jakub Kądziołka
> gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm b/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm
> index c39e60ec8b..fd6c2e099c 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm
> @@ -740,8 +740,11 @@ exec ~a/bin/.gcc-wrapped -B~a/lib \
> "1m5miqkyng45l745n0sfafdpjkqv9225xf44jqkygwsipj2cv9ks")))))))))
> (native-search-paths
> (list (search-path-specification
> - (variable "CPATH")
> + (variable "C_INCLUDE_PATH")
> (files '("include")))
> + (search-path-specification
> + (variable "CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH")
> + (files '("include/c++" "include")))
> (search-path-specification
> (variable "LIBRARY_PATH")
> (files '("lib" "lib64")))))
> --
> 2.28.0
>
I'm building out to hello on my aarch64 board now, starting from
make-boot0 apparently. Guile is only listed once so hopefully it won't
take too long.
I assume this doesn't break anything on x86_64?
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#42681
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 03 Aug 2020 11:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 09:40:26AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 10:34:21PM +0200, Jakub Kądziołka wrote:
> > This updates the bootstrap-gcc to use the same search path strategy as
> > the main compilers, making the bootstrap environment more similar across
> > architectures, and fixing the bootstrap path on non-x86 architectures
> > again.
> >
> > This is a follow up to commit 7cde865f12dd67e55946a52a21103e71f447eced.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm (%bootstrap-gcc)[native-search-paths]: Use
> > C_INCLUDE_PATH and CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH instead of CPATH.
> > ---
> >
> > Note: because I don't have any non-x86 machines on hand, I haven't
> > actually tested the patch yet.
> >
> > Efraim, you have helped me investigate this with your ARM board, perhaps
> > you could test this patch?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jakub Kądziołka
> > gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm b/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm
> > index c39e60ec8b..fd6c2e099c 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm
> > @@ -740,8 +740,11 @@ exec ~a/bin/.gcc-wrapped -B~a/lib \
> > "1m5miqkyng45l745n0sfafdpjkqv9225xf44jqkygwsipj2cv9ks")))))))))
> > (native-search-paths
> > (list (search-path-specification
> > - (variable "CPATH")
> > + (variable "C_INCLUDE_PATH")
> > (files '("include")))
> > + (search-path-specification
> > + (variable "CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH")
> > + (files '("include/c++" "include")))
> > (search-path-specification
> > (variable "LIBRARY_PATH")
> > (files '("lib" "lib64")))))
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >
>
> I'm building out to hello on my aarch64 board now, starting from
> make-boot0 apparently. Guile is only listed once so hopefully it won't
> take too long.
Thanks!
> I assume this doesn't break anything on x86_64?
I don't have hello built on current core-updates (it also wants to start
from make-boot0), but I have confirmed that guix build --no-grafts -d
hello returns the same derivation path before and after the commit.
%bootstrap-gcc is not present at all in the package graph on x86.
Regards,
Jakub Kądziołka
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#42681
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 04 Aug 2020 06:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 01:03:52PM +0200, Jakub Kądziołka wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 09:40:26AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 10:34:21PM +0200, Jakub Kądziołka wrote:
> > > This updates the bootstrap-gcc to use the same search path strategy as
> > > the main compilers, making the bootstrap environment more similar across
> > > architectures, and fixing the bootstrap path on non-x86 architectures
> > > again.
> > >
> > > This is a follow up to commit 7cde865f12dd67e55946a52a21103e71f447eced.
> > >
> > > * gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm (%bootstrap-gcc)[native-search-paths]: Use
> > > C_INCLUDE_PATH and CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH instead of CPATH.
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Note: because I don't have any non-x86 machines on hand, I haven't
> > > actually tested the patch yet.
> > >
> > > Efraim, you have helped me investigate this with your ARM board, perhaps
> > > you could test this patch?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jakub Kądziołka
> > > gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm | 5 ++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm b/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm
> > > index c39e60ec8b..fd6c2e099c 100644
> > > --- a/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm
> > > +++ b/gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm
> > > @@ -740,8 +740,11 @@ exec ~a/bin/.gcc-wrapped -B~a/lib \
> > > "1m5miqkyng45l745n0sfafdpjkqv9225xf44jqkygwsipj2cv9ks")))))))))
> > > (native-search-paths
> > > (list (search-path-specification
> > > - (variable "CPATH")
> > > + (variable "C_INCLUDE_PATH")
> > > (files '("include")))
> > > + (search-path-specification
> > > + (variable "CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH")
> > > + (files '("include/c++" "include")))
> > > (search-path-specification
> > > (variable "LIBRARY_PATH")
> > > (files '("lib" "lib64")))))
> > > --
> > > 2.28.0
> > >
> >
> > I'm building out to hello on my aarch64 board now, starting from
> > make-boot0 apparently. Guile is only listed once so hopefully it won't
> > take too long.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > I assume this doesn't break anything on x86_64?
>
> I don't have hello built on current core-updates (it also wants to start
> from make-boot0), but I have confirmed that guix build --no-grafts -d
> hello returns the same derivation path before and after the commit.
> %bootstrap-gcc is not present at all in the package graph on x86.
>
> Regards,
> Jakub Kądziołka
I was able to successfully build all the way out to hello on
aarch64-linux.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent
to
Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:35:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:35:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 42681-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 09:00:06AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 01:03:52PM +0200, Jakub Kądziołka wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 09:40:26AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 10:34:21PM +0200, Jakub Kądziołka wrote:
> > > I'm building out to hello on my aarch64 board now, starting from
> > > make-boot0 apparently. Guile is only listed once so hopefully it won't
> > > take too long.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > > I assume this doesn't break anything on x86_64?
> >
> > I don't have hello built on current core-updates (it also wants to start
> > from make-boot0), but I have confirmed that guix build --no-grafts -d
> > hello returns the same derivation path before and after the commit.
> > %bootstrap-gcc is not present at all in the package graph on x86.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jakub Kądziołka
>
> I was able to successfully build all the way out to hello on
> aarch64-linux.
This is great news! Patch pushed.
Regards,
Jakub Kądziołka
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#42681
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 05 Aug 2020 08:57:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 42681-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 02:34:35PM +0200, Jakub Kądziołka wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 09:00:06AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 01:03:52PM +0200, Jakub Kądziołka wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 09:40:26AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 10:34:21PM +0200, Jakub Kądziołka wrote:
> > > > I'm building out to hello on my aarch64 board now, starting from
> > > > make-boot0 apparently. Guile is only listed once so hopefully it won't
> > > > take too long.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > > I assume this doesn't break anything on x86_64?
> > >
> > > I don't have hello built on current core-updates (it also wants to start
> > > from make-boot0), but I have confirmed that guix build --no-grafts -d
> > > hello returns the same derivation path before and after the commit.
> > > %bootstrap-gcc is not present at all in the package graph on x86.
> > >
> >
> > I was able to successfully build all the way out to hello on
> > aarch64-linux.
>
> This is great news! Patch pushed.
>
Continued testing shows that this also worked on my aarch64 board when
building for armhf.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 02 Sep 2020 11:24:12 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 208 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.