GNU bug report logs - #42741
[PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add python-outcome.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 42741 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 42741 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vinicius Monego <monego <at> posteo.net>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Vinicius Monego <monego <at> posteo.net>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add python-outcome.
Date: Fri,  7 Aug 2020 10:24:13 -0300

* gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm (python-outcome): New variable.
---
 gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm
index e4a83a2f37..e15f1a495e 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm
@@ -18929,6 +18929,39 @@ easy-to-extend subclass system, and lots of primitive constructs to
 make your work easier.")
     (license license:expat)))
 
+(define-public python-outcome
+  (package
+    (name "python-outcome")
+    (version "1.0.1")
+    (source
+     (origin
+       (method url-fetch)
+       (uri (pypi-uri "outcome" version))
+       (sha256
+        (base32 "0vxn04vspmlkkyijjkjnsc46f93ki8g62hr7ag10zpd7ic324y7w"))))
+    (build-system python-build-system)
+    (arguments
+     `(#:phases
+       (modify-phases %standard-phases
+         (replace 'check
+           (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys)
+             (add-installed-pythonpath inputs outputs)
+             (invoke "pytest" "-vv"))))))
+    (native-inputs
+     `(("python-pytest" ,python-pytest)
+       ("python-pytest-cov" ,python-pytest-cov)
+       ("python-pytest-asyncio" ,python-pytest-asyncio)))
+    (propagated-inputs
+     `(("python-async-generator" ,python-async-generator)
+       ("python-attrs" ,python-attrs)))
+    (home-page "https://github.com/python-trio/outcome")
+    (synopsis "Capture the outcome of Python function calls")
+    (description
+     "Capture the outcome of Python function calls.  Extracted from the Trio
+project.")
+    ;; Either license applies.
+    (license (list license:expat license:asl2.0))))
+
 (define-public python-humanize
   (package
     (name "python-humanize")
-- 
2.20.1

Message #8 received at 42741 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Brett Gilio <brettg <at> gnu.org>
To: Vinicius Monego <monego <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 42741 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#42741] [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add python-outcome.
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 13:45:24 -0500

Hi Vinicius!

Thanks for your patch series. I just wanted to let you know that best
practice is to send patch series all to the same bug number instead of
opening a new bug number for each patch in the series. Thanks! :)

Message #11 received at 42741 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vinicius Monego <monego <at> posteo.net>
To: Brett Gilio <brettg <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 42741 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#42741] [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add python-outcome.
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 16:30:47 -0300

Brett Gilio writes:

> Hi Vinicius!
>
> Thanks for your patch series. I just wanted to let you know that best
> practice is to send patch series all to the same bug number instead of
> opening a new bug number for each patch in the series. Thanks! :)

Hello Brett.

Sure, but that's a problem I'm having with git. I use `git format-patch
[branch] -o folder/` and `git send-email --to="[this list]"
folder/`. Sometimes it sends to one number, sometimes it sends to
different numbers.

I sent two different series for python-h2 and python-sniffio two days
ago using the very same procedure for both. The latter was sent correctly while
the former was sent to different numbers.

Am I missing something?

Message #14 received at 42741 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vinicius Monego <monego <at> posteo.net>
To: Brett Gilio <brettg <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 42741 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#42741] [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add python-outcome.
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2020 10:35:51 -0300

Vinicius Monego writes:

> Am I missing something?

I double checked the documentation for submitting a patch series. I
thought that Git would have tools to automate this (I saw a --thread
flag in the git manpage, but it still didn't group the thread as
expected).

Anyways, I will follow the documentation more closely from now on. Apologies
for the inconvenience :-)

Message #19 received at 42741-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Vinicius Monego <monego <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 42741-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#42741] [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add python-outcome.
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2020 14:55:17 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Thanks! Pushed as 7d7ad3c946897014cc1ccb7094382b21a8f7b45c


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.