GNU bug report logs - #43398
r-rgraphviz is not Reproducible

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:22:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 43398 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 43398 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#43398; Package guix. (Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:22:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:22:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: r-rgraphviz is not Reproducible
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:21:42 +0200
Dear,

The package ’r-rgraphivz’ does not seems reproducible with Guix 4a2cb3f.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
guix build r-rgraphivz
guix build r-rgraphivz --check --no-grafts -K
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Then:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
diff -r --no-dereference \
/gnu/store/rxp72c7yh1q1m1wc7wqr5gv4dfnp53d0-r-rgraphviz-2.32.0{,-check}

Binary files /gnu/store/rxp72c7yh1q1m1wc7wqr5gv4dfnp53d0-r-rgraphviz-2.32.0/site-library/Rgraphviz/libs/Rgraphviz.so
and /gnu/store/rxp72c7yh1q1m1wc7wqr5gv4dfnp53d0-r-rgraphviz-2.32.0-check/site-library/Rgraphviz/libs/Rgraphviz.so
differ
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Well, I am not sure to correctly use diffoscope… it reports a lot of
differences.


All the best,
simon




Reply sent to Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>:
You have taken responsibility. (Mon, 14 Sep 2020 19:26:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Mon, 14 Sep 2020 19:26:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 43398-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 43398-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43398: r-rgraphviz is not Reproducible
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 21:27:00 +0200
Hi simon,

> The package ’r-rgraphivz’ does not seems reproducible with Guix 4a2cb3f.

It is now with commit 62881beb4d.

-- 
Ricardo




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#43398; Package guix. (Mon, 14 Sep 2020 19:49:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 43398-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: 43398-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43398: r-rgraphviz is not Reproducible
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 21:47:55 +0200
Hey,

On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 at 21:25, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> wrote:

> > The package ’r-rgraphivz’ does not seems reproducible with Guix 4a2cb3f.
>
> It is now with commit 62881beb4d.

Cool!
Thank you.

For my learning process, how do you find it is a date issue?  Read the
source and look for something?  Or first have a clue with diffoscope?

Cheers,
simon




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#43398; Package guix. (Mon, 14 Sep 2020 21:42:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at 43398-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 43398-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43398: r-rgraphviz is not Reproducible
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 23:42:37 +0200
zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:

> For my learning process, how do you find it is a date issue?  Read the
> source and look for something?  Or first have a clue with diffoscope?

I guessed it would be one of the usual suspects, so I unpacked the
sources and grep’ed for DATE.  I only use diffoscope when there’s
nothing obvious in the source code.

-- 
Ricardo




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#43398; Package guix. (Mon, 14 Sep 2020 21:58:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #19 received at 43398-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: 43398-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43398: r-rgraphviz is not Reproducible
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 23:57:21 +0200
Thanks for explaining.

Cheers,
simon




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:24:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 167 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.