GNU bug report logs - #43431
superfluous bury-buffer needed due to earlier gnus-summary-select-article-buffer

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 43431 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 43431 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (The Gnus Bugfixing Girls + Boys)
Subject: superfluous bury-buffer needed due to earlier
 gnus-summary-select-article-buffer
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 02:57:34 +0800

When using C-d [gnus-summary-enter-digest-group] why does one need three
q's instead of two, to return to the (Highest, not just that of the
digest) *Summary* buffer?

 C-d [gnus-summary-enter-digest-group]
 <return> [gnus-summary-scroll-up]
 h [gnus-summary-select-article-buffer]
 q [gnus-summary-expand-window]
 q [gnus-summary-exit]
 q [bury-buffer]

You know, between q number 2 and q number 3, what is on the screen does
not change at all, giving the impression that emacs is dumb.

Same here, three q's:

 C-d [gnus-summary-enter-digest-group]
 SPC [gnus-summary-next-page]
 n [gnus-summary-next-unread-article]
 h [gnus-summary-select-article-buffer]
 n [gnus-article-read-summary-keys]
 n n [gnus-article-read-summary-keys]
 n q [gnus-summary-expand-window]
 q [gnus-summary-exit]
 q [bury-buffer]

Ah. we see it is all related to that critical "h". If we never used the
"h", we would never encounter the problem:

 C-d [gnus-summary-enter-digest-group]
 SPC [gnus-summary-next-page]
 n [gnus-summary-next-unread-article]
 n [gnus-summary-next-unread-article]
 n [gnus-summary-next-unread-article]
 q [gnus-summary-exit]

Wow, only one q to get back to the (Highest, not just that of the
digest) *Summary* buffer.

Anyway, for the h cases, please make it use two q's instead of three.
Thanks.

P.S., it may be due to my
https://www.jidanni.org/comp/configuration/.emacs
https://www.jidanni.org/comp/configuration/.gnus.el

Gnus v5.13
GNU Emacs 26.3 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.20)
 of 2020-05-17, modified by Debian

Message #8 received at 43431 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
Cc: 43431 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43431: superfluous bury-buffer needed due to earlier
 gnus-summary-select-article-buffer
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:18:07 +0200

積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org> writes:

> When using C-d [gnus-summary-enter-digest-group] why does one need three
> q's instead of two, to return to the (Highest, not just that of the
> digest) *Summary* buffer?
>
>  C-d [gnus-summary-enter-digest-group]
>  <return> [gnus-summary-scroll-up]
>  h [gnus-summary-select-article-buffer]
>  q [gnus-summary-expand-window]
>  q [gnus-summary-exit]
>  q [bury-buffer]

I'm unable to reproduce this -- q isn't bound to
gnus-summary-expand-window for me.  Is this a local customisation you've
done?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message #11 received at 43431 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 43431 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43431: superfluous bury-buffer needed due to earlier
 gnus-summary-select-article-buffer
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 00:32:55 +0800

>>>>> "LI" == Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
LI> 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org> writes:

>> When using C-d [gnus-summary-enter-digest-group] why does one need three
>> q's instead of two, to return to the (Highest, not just that of the
>> digest) *Summary* buffer?
>> 
>> C-d [gnus-summary-enter-digest-group]
>> <return> [gnus-summary-scroll-up]
>> h [gnus-summary-select-article-buffer]
>> q [gnus-summary-expand-window]
>> q [gnus-summary-exit]
>> q [bury-buffer]

LI> I'm unable to reproduce this -- q isn't bound to
LI> gnus-summary-expand-window for me.  Is this a local customisation you've
LI> done?

Yes I see my https://www.jidanni.org/comp/configuration/.gnus.el has
(define-key gnus-article-mode-map [?q] 'gnus-summary-expand-window); #35876

"So try that and see how it feels." Thanks.

Message #14 received at 43431 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
Cc: 43431 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43431: superfluous bury-buffer needed due to earlier
 gnus-summary-select-article-buffer
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 18:41:12 +0200

積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org> writes:

> Yes I see my https://www.jidanni.org/comp/configuration/.gnus.el has
> (define-key gnus-article-mode-map [?q] 'gnus-summary-expand-window); #35876
>
> "So try that and see how it feels." Thanks.

You're welcome, I'm sure.

So there doesn't seem to be a bug here, and I'm closing this bug report.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.