GNU bug report logs - #43432
trilinos source vanished

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 43432 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 43432 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: trilinos source vanished
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 22:24:09 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

The source page for trilinos (gnu packages engineering) now points to a
Github page and the previous tarballs no longer seem to be available.
There's a content addressed substitute available from Berlin but I don't
see an original tarball from Debian to point to.


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #8 received at 43432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 43432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43432: trilinos source vanished
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:37:48 +0200

Hi,

On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 22:24, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
> The source page for trilinos (gnu packages engineering) now points to a
> Github page and the previous tarballs no longer seem to be available.
> There's a content addressed substitute available from Berlin but I don't
> see an original tarball from Debian to point to.

Ouch!

Well, Github delivers this tarball:

  <https://github.com/trilinos/Trilinos/archive/trilinos-release-12-12-1.tar.gz>

but yes, the hash does not match (guix download).  Does it matter?  Is
it not possible to replace the vanished tarball by this one?


And it seems better to switch to git-fetch with commit.  Some arguments
are exposed in this thread:

  <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-05/msg00224.html>

BTW, since the Tarball Heritage is not ready yet, currently the easiest
is to use ’git-fetch’, via “guix lint” to queue to SWH and with the
right content-address, the fallback works.


All the best,
simon

Message #11 received at 43432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 43432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43432: trilinos source vanished
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:09:07 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:37:48AM +0200, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 22:24, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
> > The source page for trilinos (gnu packages engineering) now points to a
> > Github page and the previous tarballs no longer seem to be available.
> > There's a content addressed substitute available from Berlin but I don't
> > see an original tarball from Debian to point to.
> 
> Ouch!
> 
> Well, Github delivers this tarball:
> 
>   <https://github.com/trilinos/Trilinos/archive/trilinos-release-12-12-1.tar.gz>
> 
> but yes, the hash does not match (guix download).  Does it matter?  Is
> it not possible to replace the vanished tarball by this one?

That's one of the autogenerated tarballs, so it wouldn't work in any
case.

> And it seems better to switch to git-fetch with commit.  Some arguments
> are exposed in this thread:
> 
>   <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-05/msg00224.html>
> 
> BTW, since the Tarball Heritage is not ready yet, currently the easiest
> is to use ’git-fetch’, via “guix lint” to queue to SWH and with the
> right content-address, the fallback works.
> 
> 
> All the best,
> simon

I think it might be better to see about updating it to a newer version
and switch it to git-fetch at the same time.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #14 received at 43432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 43432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43432: trilinos source vanished
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 17:38:40 +0200

Hi,

I think it is a duplicate of #40074 [1].  I am in favour to close both.

1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/40074>


Cheers,
simon

Message #17 received at 43432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 43432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43432: trilinos source vanished
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 16:23:20 +0000

On October 18, 2022 3:38:40 PM UTC, zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I think it is a duplicate of #40074 [1].  I am in favour to close both.
>
>1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/40074>
>
>
>Cheers,
>simon

Works for me
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.