GNU logs - #43585, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#43585: Order in manifest and command-line differs
Resent-From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:39:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.43585.B.160090433527764 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 43585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 01:38:46 +0200
Message-ID: <86v9g4kqrd.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::429;
 envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN; helo=mail-wr1-x429.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

Dear,

It is probably more a feature than a bug (and it is expected, I guess).
However, it can be misleading.  For example,

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix package -i busybox diffutils -p /tmp/foo
$ ls -l /tmp/foo/bin
[..]
 df -> /gnu/store/=E2=80=A6-busybox-1.31.1/bin/df
 diff -> /gnu/store/=E2=80=A6-diffutils-3.7/bin/diff
 diff3 -> /gnu/store/=E2=80=A6-diffutils-3.7/bin/diff3
 dirname -> /gnu/store/=E2=80=A6-busybox-1.31.1/bin/dirname
[..]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

And the same result is obtained with the manifest.scm file:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(specifications->manifest '("diffutils" "busybox"))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---


This difference could be counter-intuitive.  One of the two lists should
be internally reverse=E2=80=99d.  WDYT?


(Even if it is a corner-case, 2 packages providing the same tool, but it
matters for <profile>/manifest.)

All the best,
simon

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#43585: Acknowledgement (Order in manifest and command-line
 differs)
Message-ID: <handler.43585.B.160090433527764.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <86v9g4kqrd.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 43585
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 43585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:39:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 43585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
43585: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D43585
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#43585: Order in manifest and command-line differs
Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:09:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.43585.B43585.160095293130754 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Cc: 43585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
References: <86v9g4kqrd.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:08:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: <86v9g4kqrd.fsf@HIDDEN> (zimoun's message of "Thu, 24 Sep 2020
 01:38:46 +0200")
Message-ID: <871rir725l.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>


Hello zimoun,

> $ guix package -i busybox diffutils -p /tmp/foo
> $ ls -l /tmp/foo/bin
> [..]
>  df -> /gnu/store/=E2=80=A6-busybox-1.31.1/bin/df
>  diff -> /gnu/store/=E2=80=A6-diffutils-3.7/bin/diff
>  diff3 -> /gnu/store/=E2=80=A6-diffutils-3.7/bin/diff3
>  dirname -> /gnu/store/=E2=80=A6-busybox-1.31.1/bin/dirname
> [..]

The order of what appears in "bin" depends on both the name of the
binaries provided by both packages and also how the "ls" command decides
to sort its output. I'm not sure that much can be done here.

Thanks,

Mathieu

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#43585: Order in manifest and command-line differs
Resent-From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:09:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.43585.B43585.16009565075940 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
Cc: 43585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <86v9g4kqrd.fsf@HIDDEN> <871rir725l.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <871rir725l.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:08:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ0xME_8sN-D5H7jPFjQx=RAxpw9K+3sZvfec0JyB+0Ghg@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi Mathieu,

On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 15:08, Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN> wrote:

> The order of what appears in "bin" depends on both the name of the
> binaries provided by both packages and also how the "ls" command decides
> to sort its output. I'm not sure that much can be done here.

I have badly worded.  The point is that "diffutils" and "busybox"
provide both the 'diff' binary.  Therefore, depending on the order,
'diff' is provided by one or the other.  Compare:

    guix package -i busybox diffutils -p /tmp/busybox-diffutils
   /tmp/busybox-diffutils/bin/diff

and

    guix package -i diffutils busybox -p /tmp/diffutils-busybox
   /tmp/diffutils-busybox/bin/diff

In the same time, compare the manifest.scm files:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
  ;;; busybox-diffutils.scm
  (specifications->manifest '("busybox" "diffutils"))

  ;;; diffutils-busybox.scm
  (specifications->manifest '("diffutils" "busybox"))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

then

    guix package -m busybox-diffutils.scm -p /tmp/busybox-diffutils-m
   /tmp/busybox-diffutils-m/bin/diff

and

    guix package -m diffutils-busybox.scm -p /tmp/diffutils-busybox-m
   /tmp/diffutils-busybox-m/bin/diff


Concretely, "guix package" processes command-line arguments from right
to left.  And the manifest.scm file read the list in order (so from
left to right).

All the best,
simon

PS:
For another example not related:

$ guix package --show=diffutils --show=busybox | recsel -C -p name
name: busybox
name: diffutils

and  "guix show" corrects that, processing from left to right.

$ guix show diffutils busybox | recsel -C -p name
name: diffutils
name: busybox

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#43585: Order in manifest and command-line differs
Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:55:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.43585.B43585.160103487024941 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43585
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Cc: 43585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 43585-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B43585.160103487024941
          (code B ref 43585); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:55:02 +0000
Received: (at 43585) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2020 11:54:30 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42924 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kLmJ3-0006UC-Rr
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 07:54:30 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56486)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1kLmJ0-0006Tx-PL
 for 43585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 07:54:28 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33454)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kLmIv-0002Np-DT; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 07:54:21 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:ec26:a22:2e08:e47e] (port=45796 helo=cervin)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kLmIu-0001yh-SS; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 07:54:21 -0400
From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
References: <86v9g4kqrd.fsf@HIDDEN> <871rir725l.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CAJ3okZ0xME_8sN-D5H7jPFjQx=RAxpw9K+3sZvfec0JyB+0Ghg@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:54:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ0xME_8sN-D5H7jPFjQx=RAxpw9K+3sZvfec0JyB+0Ghg@HIDDEN>
 (zimoun's message of "Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:08:06 +0200")
Message-ID: <87h7rmdqc4.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)


Hey zimoun,

Oh I see, thanks for explaining!

It would be nice if the `guix package -i` command could also operate
from left to right then.  Would you like to give it a try?

Thanks,

Mathieu
-- 
https://othacehe.org

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#43585: Order in manifest and command-line differs
Resent-From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 13:15:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.43585.B43585.16232444899365 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43585
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
Cc: 43585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 43585-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B43585.16232444899365
          (code B ref 43585); Wed, 09 Jun 2021 13:15:03 +0000
Received: (at 43585) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2021 13:14:49 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60789 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lqy2i-0002Qs-QY
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:14:49 -0400
Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com ([209.85.221.41]:42961)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1lqy2b-0002PT-Hw
 for 43585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:14:43 -0400
Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id c5so25403664wrq.9
 for <43585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 06:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
 :user-agent:mime-version;
 bh=DiiV4jx+OhbCRoLvUsvaOar8qdVVKqSpji2DVvb6+kM=;
 b=vGXiIO4c42rCnpvfXz8ldM0zAVcxagIFDr13Cuh8asenRPFLs3WyloUdkVCSKYko8s
 MbW5tFpXAikOGAyyviCL3RsgiOZFfNfl44UfupIONY7U9JPnmkKMCUjcFbkZkyVS0Pg4
 dYHUH7SEen7dLJXvnp3W+LitnILEBXlVg8vkSe1YY5AxGVUFpGA/m5vDXKDgO+uyiuxg
 M+wxrMoShhMQzd2G3/80V/1HdoccWPQvVTFBn8AAdg8cuLnSsYMuOTBfdtgOLM060b6b
 mQW9+O6Mo+a7NcdI51JSEPnvqu6B059oMbp3gIFoxeMDHwZzRINDnw0kUhWv3osTKQAj
 47EA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
 :message-id:user-agent:mime-version;
 bh=DiiV4jx+OhbCRoLvUsvaOar8qdVVKqSpji2DVvb6+kM=;
 b=NChKBx49u7/zWo1TC3uf+j2w88ruwBoAVKR38+GxvtPQrgk2m0s2gvT/PjGf7vOys1
 nEW9essD+wX5KYoJ4LdEe/HjnmPBOCcIpflZ/a/Yk+jFm9Je53chuP8H04lM+9QpghZs
 HfoCURtmyrGwjGTbnCgerp7IXG8YxOPTzC1vXdafnp5FljZLmuVWVZz8einYNjfqDeVw
 dEyH++KAx/TPTKuIjn2Jj+6KviK2MDFmmdGX3uAVQxRHyro1gSbwHe7YbeYnwvkx/ZvI
 hrNbe+peOnZI5L0RPoEuH/FxL30unUxIU8sAASZ28g0cfbNjyb/uLGya7OEgrcsjhgVT
 e+Sg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532tQzoNja50AEbv4CShQiqbc6u+BCBlBeWwaW2MOZmZKWj71rao
 ntey8jH0CSIBGj8Di1jdl1UyqcXNYgA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhfIDRphvbQ1HEbuDIND24GCIIPyc/D1uhQs3DPzOJHxTIaLNkmXcfa9bztiHHOarFZ073nQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6da9:: with SMTP id u9mr28337614wrs.264.1623244476036; 
 Wed, 09 Jun 2021 06:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pfiuh02 ([193.48.40.241])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j12sm14817722wrt.69.2021.06.09.06.14.35
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Wed, 09 Jun 2021 06:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
References: <86v9g4kqrd.fsf@HIDDEN> <871rir725l.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CAJ3okZ0xME_8sN-D5H7jPFjQx=RAxpw9K+3sZvfec0JyB+0Ghg@HIDDEN>
 <87h7rmdqc4.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:13:09 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87h7rmdqc4.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Fri, 25
 Sep 2020 13:54:19 +0200")
Message-ID: <87r1jvfouy.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Hi, On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 13:54, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
 > It would be nice if the `guix package -i` command could also operate > from
 left to right then. Would you like to give it a try? 
 Content analysis details:   (2.1 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com)
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 2.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX     Date: is 96 hours or more before Received:
 date -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
 [209.85.221.41 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust [209.85.221.41 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Hi, On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 13:54, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
   > It would be nice if the `guix package -i` command could also operate > from
    left to right then. Would you like to give it a try? 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.1 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                              no trust
                             [209.85.221.41 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
                             [209.85.221.41 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
                             provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com)
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  2.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX     Date: is 96 hours or more before Received:
                             date
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

Hi,

On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 13:54, Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN> wrote:

> It would be nice if the `guix package -i` command could also operate
> from left to right then.  Would you like to give it a try?

I will not do.  I am not interested any more.  Closing?

Cheers,
simon

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2025 11:50:22 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 16 07:50:22 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43655 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uR8M2-0008MO-51
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 07:50:22 -0400
Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::430]:58540)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>)
 id 1uR8LX-00089l-G1
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 07:49:52 -0400
Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id
 ffacd0b85a97d-3a53359dea5so2982779f8f.0
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 04:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1750074584; x=1750679384; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=subject:from:to:message-id:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
 :reply-to; bh=QAa0DA7tAVX6nlFehoWfEBctDXGEfiokWCeVDPl9BSE=;
 b=jyTFW2SBEPtiJ0XMrB0jhbJoKX8UNgM2gJKzdlYYLoZiNNL+2vy0kuklHytmCEASIe
 1aBwuCuLTa3lmYTYDJ3EQ05VXYxe2myNb7DcGbNBX6IRIIkPWSxvTokT+uMBMmKnhuxi
 Cs26qvErI/MfLJgBTo2Tv6Uz1YPHavm9adImsqjEZ38jkStPKNSdVKOvY65dLUuQI6PC
 JL3ZnQZYop/5aPs/eAWqtRGizI8DqxFfsICzD88EqwNUV7zZvL3ELjePRaVUvEC8IiDX
 A366rt4VHDc/t6yKqSXnmvpII5ADEJxunmS8DGpyHe2qf2/73BOFoPkL/Bo3RE9lCkBf
 V2ig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750074584; x=1750679384;
 h=subject:from:to:message-id:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=QAa0DA7tAVX6nlFehoWfEBctDXGEfiokWCeVDPl9BSE=;
 b=bOjp2rAF5GSU9SCp0Q5oUHjnzqh0ev81eEctJGiTQH2LVTOCZxNhlrFPIpQM8yJaxj
 vVabC4+WupmEPn0+a9HswIMrv+rgTK2Z51uTQJoHL/IJyyithGkOhJnRD9LJ2kTJPGc2
 P5PUENuFKr4yJo1fQEbw1irW03Ygff/XgYUkdQtDG1TjBwXha6R/AtmXM8gl9HdbFzc0
 96eHzWMTWwYX5PEfqAnJM6sHzbKoUCgUAqog+sGDOOWjPjwFwjf0aF2PEB9Zn39OzUkM
 cYKsLgx0JMg9Td+HVNdp8xcADl1F6n+9PDsAiDKsS0AjL9VuQXZXX0dKGggN/Id2b2EY
 mEsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yytich1cfnim96gXDYOxkluShRFANCLzCz/ghdYFfKj98iSbErW
 FNIAIt1NZXKHZ3LEoviw4WLwzGS8j3fquZWl+M9TLFqxnZAbzUp2VcF22aQqBDoS
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs+AkeZkg41hSQmxgY1AF6DBvLV339RVqtOSf+2xAOfJsWsC0knjBzIaakT6YF
 9/33/UDxQZollnJy5yNRlerxUIZ22qEMhNCqcnJxaaAPqBYFdUVIR0n16P5emy3kd5U1OH0rUar
 x5L4H+jiLmYH5aAXGl0DQLI0A1FhnapLBHZi73KNQyPoO52wf1rkyHcSE3+KxXoITo1Iyb8eXKc
 v7LCGMraHER8aMbK7owOwSINZkEjsf9Z6GK4aCTfmBoWdGr4IQrg85FHff5sKqZzfQpq3RUShUs
 XdwdRJL+EYAekHBvIdBVraTH0U50nrFOv/48DBgtBcqIdG6tbwnavYzTkCa4CD2SLFT3riMn0Z+
 NvJZ1Xw96WJS692uFqF8ztTBLbkIsOO/eLA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGIwGEPmVdYiKvcl3Ryq+Bo/hOAXOjPExZqwvoa4wTGkJCjlgM5N41NfWh0mgWS1aLSBr7IiQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2003:b0:3a4:e6d7:6160 with SMTP id
 ffacd0b85a97d-3a5723679cdmr6424218f8f.6.1750074583929; 
 Mon, 16 Jun 2025 04:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lili (nat-dsi-209.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr. [81.194.30.209])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 ffacd0b85a97d-3a568b628ecsm10993341f8f.92.2025.06.16.04.49.43
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Mon, 16 Jun 2025 04:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 12:40:49 +0200
Message-Id: <87wm9c6kb2.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #43585
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

merge 43585 40382
quit

Last modified: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.