GNU bug report logs -
#44179
can't build proot-static
Previous Next
Reported by: luhux <luhux <at> outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:44:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 44179 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 44179 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44179
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:44:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
luhux <luhux <at> outlook.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:44:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
If it can be fixed, I can run my packaged Emacs environment on my Android phone.
I executed this command on my x86_64-linux:
guix pack -s aarch64-linux -RR busybox
but it fail:
[build.log (text/plain, attachment)]
Reply sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Thu, 05 Aug 2021 03:27:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
luhux <luhux <at> outlook.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Thu, 05 Aug 2021 03:27:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 44179-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
luhux <luhux <at> outlook.com> writes:
> If it can be fixed, I can run my packaged Emacs environment on my Android phone.
>
> I executed this command on my x86_64-linux:
>
> guix pack -s aarch64-linux -RR busybox
>
> but it fail:
[...]
> starting phase `build'
> make: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-proot-static-5.1.0.drv-0/proot-5.1.0-checkout/src'
> GEN build.h
> CC cli/cli.o
> CC cli/proot.o
> CC cli/note.o
> CC execve/enter.o
> ./execve/enter.c: In function ‘compute_load_addresses’:
> ./execve/enter.c:335:36: error: ‘EXEC_PIC_ADDRESS’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> add_load_base(tracee->load_info, EXEC_PIC_ADDRESS);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./execve/enter.c:335:36: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> ./execve/enter.c:349:44: error: ‘INTERP_PIC_ADDRESS’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘EXEC_PIC_ADDRESS’?
> add_load_base(tracee->load_info->interp, INTERP_PIC_ADDRESS);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> EXEC_PIC_ADDRESS
I fixed that one some time ago with commit
c881516d4834cc628864bfc193cfb061c3dcde42.
Closing.
Thank you,
Maxim
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 02 Sep 2021 11:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 229 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.