GNU bug report logs -
#44399
Cuirass problem with building from manifest file
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 44399 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 44399 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44399
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 02 Nov 2020 19:46:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
david larsson <david.larsson <at> selfhosted.xyz>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 02 Nov 2020 19:46:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi!
I am unable to build a simple manifest containing the hello package, see
below. I tried imitating the manual
https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Continuous-Integration.html but
perhaps the manifest.scm is not supposed to contain a regular manifest
or maybe that config example is outdated?
============================
The hello.scm file - works fine using guix package -m hello.scm
============================
cat /home/cuirass/my-guixsd-config.sh/manifests/hello.scm
(specifications->manifest
(append (list "hello")
'()))
============================
From /var/log/cuirass.log
============================
2020-11-02T20:06:25 fetching input 'my-guixsd-config' of spec 'my-pkgs'
2020-11-02T20:06:25 fetching input 'my-guix-packages' of spec 'my-pkgs'
2020-11-02T20:06:25 fetching input 'guix' of spec 'my-pkgs'
2020-11-02T20:06:26 fetched input 'my-guixsd-config' of spec 'my-pkgs'
(commit "fb3001bd453583b4638bf6ec7187b5758d7b0715")
2020-11-02T20:06:26 fetched input 'my-guix-packages' of spec 'my-pkgs'
(commit "9f9c644076b088aabee76626598115c0fe6bfbde")
2020-11-02T20:06:26 fetched input 'guix' of spec 'my-pkgs' (commit
"7c02eb6c8d7d050ecb8f3082c4a754ad32211403")
2020-11-02T20:06:26 next evaluation in 36000 seconds
2020-11-02T20:06:26 evaluating spec 'my-pkgs'
Uncaught exception in fiber ##f:
In cuirass/base.scm:
785:13 3 (_)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1736:10 2 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
1669:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
1667:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1667:16: In procedure raise-exception:
ERROR:
1. &evaluation-error:
name: "my-pkgs"
id: 1
============================
My cuirass-specs
============================
(define %cuirass-specs
#~(
list
'((#:name . "my-pkgs")
(#:load-path-inputs . ("guix"))
(#:package-path-inputs . ("my-guix-packages"))
(#:proc-input . "guix")
(#:proc-file . "build-aux/cuirass/gnu-system.scm")
(#:proc . cuirass-jobs)
(#:proc-args .
((subset . manifests)
;; This builds fine!
;;(subset . ("hello" "cowsay" "orgmk" "fwknop" "python-on-guile"
"libxml2-xpath0" "guile-bash-parallel" "guile-base64" "perl-data-ical"
"python-pydotplus"))
(systems . ("x86_64-linux"))
;; This fails on 7c02eb6
(manifests . (("my-guixsd-config" . "hello.scm")))
))
(#:inputs . (
((#:name . "guix")
(#:url . "git://git.savannah.gnu.org/guix.git")
(#:load-path . ".")
;;(#:branch . "master")
(#:commit .
"7c02eb6c8d7d050ecb8f3082c4a754ad32211403")
((#:name . "my-guix-packages")
(#:url . "file:///home/cuirass/my-guix-packages")
(#:load-path . "packages")
(#:branch . "master")
(#:no-compile? . #t))
((#:name . "my-guixsd-config")
(#:url . "file:///home/cuirass/my-guixsd-config.sh")
(#:load-path . "manifests")
(#:branch . "master")
(#:no-compile? . #t))
))
(#:build-outputs . ()))
))
============================
And the evaluations file content
============================
gzip --decompress -c /var/log/cuirass/evaluations/1.gz
warning:
building things during evaluation
'build-things' arguments:
(("/gnu/store/qhm7xsikyykvjisi8kbmzp8ny3cmf370-compute-guix-derivation.drv")
0)
Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'...
warning:
building things during evaluation
'build-things' arguments:
(("/gnu/store/ps30mn7xq0ymcrdzlwim8pkv1czgv2zf-profile.drv") 0)
ERROR: In procedure read:
In procedure scm_lreadr: #<unknown port>:16:634: Unknown # object: #\<
Best regards,
David Larsson
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44399
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 02 Nov 2020 20:13:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 44399 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello David,
> (("/gnu/store/ps30mn7xq0ymcrdzlwim8pkv1czgv2zf-profile.drv") 0)
> ERROR: In procedure read:
> In procedure scm_lreadr: #<unknown port>:16:634: Unknown # object: #\<
This is probably a consequence of me breaking things today. I restored
the original handling of package licenses with b5f2a035.
This means that you need to uses non "#f" licenses in your custom
packages to avoid the issue you encountered in
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/44370.
Could you please confirm that it works?
Thanks,
Mathieu
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44399
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 03 Nov 2020 07:09:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 44399 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2020-11-02 20:12, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
>
> Could you please confirm that it works?
>
It does not. Building from manifest gives no error at all but goes
stale. The last output line in /var/log/cuirass.log is just:
2020-11-03T07:57:46 evaluating spec 'my-pkgs'
htop shows no cpu usage.
Building packages with #f licenses throws the same error again as in
#44370.
Packages are otherwise built but reported as failed, as in
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/44390
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44399
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 03 Nov 2020 16:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 44399 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2020-11-02 20:12, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
>
> Could you please confirm that it works?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
Things do work now. I had made a mistake in my config.
In case it helps someone; to fix it, I changed my-guixsd-config input
load path to ".":
((#:name . "config")
(#:url . "file:///home/cuirass/my-guixsd-config.sh")
(#:load-path . ".")
(#:branch . "master")
(#:no-compile? . #t))
and in proc-args I changed the manifests path, and made sure "manifests"
has quotes around it, so I changed it to:
(#:proc-args .
((subset . "manifests")
(systems . ("x86_64-linux"))
(manifests . (("config" . "manifests/user1.scm")))
))
which now built over 200 packages successfully, yay!
Thanks for your help Mathieu!
Best regards,
David
Reply sent
to
Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Thu, 25 Mar 2021 13:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
david larsson <david.larsson <at> selfhosted.xyz>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Thu, 25 Mar 2021 13:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 44399-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
As the specification format is completely new and the evaluation process
has been rewritten, I think we can close this one.
Thanks,
Mathieu
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:24:14 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 340 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.