GNU bug report logs -
#44558
Mesa isn't update to date
Previous Next
Reported by: romulasry <romulasry <at> protonmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:30:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 44558 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 44558 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44558
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:30:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
romulasry <romulasry <at> protonmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:30:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Mesa 20.2.2 is released
November 6, 2020
https://docs.mesa3d.org/relnotes/20.2.2.html
Also it would be nice to see it built with lllvm 11
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44558
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:40:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 44558 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
I think this email went to the wrong place, because you only sent a "bug
report" not a patch. I think it's better to send these kind of things to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Best regards,
Barnabas Beres
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44558
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:25:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 44558 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hullo!
Barnabás Béres 写道:
> I think this email went to the wrong place, because you only
> sent a "bug
> report" not a patch. I think it's better to send these kind of
> things to
> bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Does your mail client mark it as a patch? Strange. I've deleted
the original, but bug-guix@ delivered the list copy to my inbox
and I don't see ‘patches’ in the header.
That said, it's not really a bug report either, or the bug is
missing...
Romulasry, are you suffering from specific Mesa 20.0.7 problems
that 20.2.2 might fix? Please let us know. An otherwise working
package not being at the latest upstream version isn't a bug.
romulasry via Bug reports for GNU Guix 写道:
> Mesa 20.2.2 is released
The core-updates branch updates Mesa to 20.1.9. Would you like to
submit a (tested) core-updates patch updating it to 20.2.2?
> Also it would be nice to see it built with lllvm 11
Same for this! All help is appreciated.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44558
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:09:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 44558 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Yes it marked as a patch
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. nov. 11.,
Sze, 13:24):
> Hullo!
>
> Barnabás Béres 写道:
> > I think this email went to the wrong place, because you only
> > sent a "bug
> > report" not a patch. I think it's better to send these kind of
> > things to
> > bug-guix <at> gnu.org
>
> Does your mail client mark it as a patch? Strange. I've deleted
> the original, but bug-guix@ delivered the list copy to my inbox
> and I don't see ‘patches’ in the header.
>
> That said, it's not really a bug report either, or the bug is
> missing...
>
> Romulasry, are you suffering from specific Mesa 20.0.7 problems
> that 20.2.2 might fix? Please let us know. An otherwise working
> package not being at the latest upstream version isn't a bug.
>
> romulasry via Bug reports for GNU Guix 写道:
> > Mesa 20.2.2 is released
>
> The core-updates branch updates Mesa to 20.1.9. Would you like to
> submit a (tested) core-updates patch updating it to 20.2.2?
>
> > Also it would be nice to see it built with lllvm 11
>
> Same for this! All help is appreciated.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> T G-R
>
--
Barnus
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44558
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 44558 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Barnabás Béres 写道:
> Yes it marked as a patch
Thanks for letting me know. That shouldn't happen, but I can't
say more without knowing more about your MUA and veering
off-topic.
I can say only that it was sent to bug-guix[0], not
guix-patches[0], and never had [PATCH] in the topic. Both Web
interfaces and emacs-debbugs agree.
A mystery,
T G-R
[0]:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2020-11/threads.html
[1]:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2020-11/threads.html
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44558
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 44558 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Thanks for the feedback!
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. nov. 11.,
Sze, 14:25):
> Barnabás Béres 写道:
> > Yes it marked as a patch
>
> Thanks for letting me know. That shouldn't happen, but I can't
> say more without knowing more about your MUA and veering
> off-topic.
>
> I can say only that it was sent to bug-guix[0], not
> guix-patches[0], and never had [PATCH] in the topic. Both Web
> interfaces and emacs-debbugs agree.
>
> A mystery,
>
> T G-R
>
> [0]:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2020-11/threads.html
> [1]:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2020-11/threads.html
>
Best Regards,
Barnabas Beres
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44558
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 44558 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> skribis:
> Romulasry, are you suffering from specific Mesa 20.0.7 problems that 20.2.2
> might fix? Please let us know. An otherwise working package not being at the
> latest upstream version isn't a bug.
>
> romulasry via Bug reports for GNU Guix 写道:
>> Mesa 20.2.2 is released
>
> The core-updates branch updates Mesa to 20.1.9. Would you like to submit
> a (tested) core-updates patch updating it to 20.2.2?
Hi,
Mesa 20.2 brings direct OpenGL rendering support for Nvidia RTX 20xx
graphic cards with the nouveau driver, whereas with our current version
these cards have to use LLVMpipe.
I tested the update quickly on my local staging branch using glxgears
and vlc, and it worked fine. When reading a video the CPU usage dropped
from 30% to 2%, which is nice.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44558
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 12 Nov 2020 21:28:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 44558 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> writes:
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> Romulasry, are you suffering from specific Mesa 20.0.7 problems that 20.2.2
>> might fix? Please let us know. An otherwise working package not being at the
>> latest upstream version isn't a bug.
>>
>> romulasry via Bug reports for GNU Guix 写道:
>>> Mesa 20.2.2 is released
>>
>> The core-updates branch updates Mesa to 20.1.9. Would you like to submit
>> a (tested) core-updates patch updating it to 20.2.2?
>
> Hi,
>
> Mesa 20.2 brings direct OpenGL rendering support for Nvidia RTX 20xx
> graphic cards with the nouveau driver, whereas with our current version
> these cards have to use LLVMpipe.
> I tested the update quickly on my local staging branch using glxgears
> and vlc, and it worked fine. When reading a video the CPU usage dropped
> from 30% to 2%, which is nice.
That is great news.
The current 'staging' branch is just about ready for merge[*], so a Mesa
update will have to wait until the next round.
However, I think libGL is fairly ABI-stable, so you may be able to
"graft" this version in the mean time, like in commit
fdd883509301845ddb4dc90e70e58b469afb5441.
[*] gst-plugins-good fails on armhf and i686, not sure what to do about
it yet: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-plugins-good/-/issues/803
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44558
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:58:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #29 received at 44558 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org> skribis:
> Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> writes:
>
>> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> skribis:
>>
>>> Romulasry, are you suffering from specific Mesa 20.0.7 problems that 20.2.2
>>> might fix? Please let us know. An otherwise working package not being at the
>>> latest upstream version isn't a bug.
>>>
>>> romulasry via Bug reports for GNU Guix 写道:
>>>> Mesa 20.2.2 is released
>>>
>>> The core-updates branch updates Mesa to 20.1.9. Would you like to submit
>>> a (tested) core-updates patch updating it to 20.2.2?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Mesa 20.2 brings direct OpenGL rendering support for Nvidia RTX 20xx
>> graphic cards with the nouveau driver, whereas with our current version
>> these cards have to use LLVMpipe.
>> I tested the update quickly on my local staging branch using glxgears
>> and vlc, and it worked fine. When reading a video the CPU usage dropped
>> from 30% to 2%, which is nice.
>
> That is great news.
>
> The current 'staging' branch is just about ready for merge[*], so a Mesa
> update will have to wait until the next round.
>
> However, I think libGL is fairly ABI-stable, so you may be able to
> "graft" this version in the mean time, like in commit
> fdd883509301845ddb4dc90e70e58b469afb5441.
>
> [*] gst-plugins-good fails on armhf and i686, not sure what to do about
> it yet: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-plugins-good/-/issues/803
I'll try this grafting trick, thanks for the pointer.
I saw that issue 803 of gst-plugin-good has been closed with patch
2ce5909f; are there other things blocking the merge of the 'staging'
branch into 'master'?
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#44558
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #32 received at 44558 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> writes:
> I saw that issue 803 of gst-plugin-good has been closed with patch
> 2ce5909f; are there other things blocking the merge of the 'staging'
> branch into 'master'?
Now 'gst-plugins-bad' fails on i686:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-plugins-bad/-/issues/1463
There are not a lot of packages depending on it, so maybe it can be
ignored. However 'gnome' is one of the affected packages (through
'cheese').
Other than these I don't know any serious regressions, but it's hard to
tell because Cuirass has not been very cooperative:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/staging-staging
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sun, 14 Nov 2021 01:27:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
romulasry <romulasry <at> protonmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sun, 14 Nov 2021 01:27:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #37 received at 44558-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> writes:
>
>> I saw that issue 803 of gst-plugin-good has been closed with patch
>> 2ce5909f; are there other things blocking the merge of the 'staging'
>> branch into 'master'?
>
> Now 'gst-plugins-bad' fails on i686:
>
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-plugins-bad/-/issues/1463
>
> There are not a lot of packages depending on it, so maybe it can be
> ignored. However 'gnome' is one of the affected packages (through
> 'cheese').
>
> Other than these I don't know any serious regressions, but it's hard to
> tell because Cuirass has not been very cooperative:
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/staging-staging
The soon to be merged core-updates-frozen has a recent mesa (21.2.4).
Closing.
Thanks for the report!
Maxim
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:24:09 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 97 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.