GNU bug report logs - #44723
Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable (502)

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>; dated Wed, 18 Nov 2020 16:41:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2020 09:14:57 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 19 04:14:57 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38165 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kfg1p-00054E-FZ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:14:57 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59306)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1kfg1l-00053y-PZ
 for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:14:55 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49035)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kfg1g-0004Of-24; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:14:48 -0500
Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:b0e9:5d53:5d5c:ccf2] (port=42894 helo=cervin)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kfg1e-0006dh-Ox; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:14:47 -0500
From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable
 (502)
References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN>
 <878saxixf9.fsf@HIDDEN> <86blft3fev.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:14:45 +0100
In-Reply-To: <86blft3fev.fsf@HIDDEN> (zimoun's message of "Thu, 19 Nov 2020
 09:43:36 +0100")
Message-ID: <87mtzdpv22.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723
Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)


Hey zimoun,

> Where is the configuration?  Repo maintenance?  Elsewhere?

Yes it's here: 
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/tree/hydra/modules/sysadmin/services.scm

Thanks,

Mathieu




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#44723; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2020 08:46:47 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 19 03:46:47 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kffaZ-0004Kk-6Z
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:46:47 -0500
Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com ([209.85.128.49]:38222)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1kffaW-0004KT-4R
 for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:46:45 -0500
Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 1so5963679wme.3
 for <44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:46:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=sZHUHspXR2mOUsW8lfvNqMEG83ATBCPZVvVQRLGzml8=;
 b=aruKSBKIRj0xM+CuQN3cUj57fxVKtiyKjMKr7PB02hFBRx3UR4kSz0ISn+Qzhu0sEM
 Ief7ojhsadg0Ck/iBHp8QDxqJldR5Hm2b+Qfb7vzD++JZ6nUqY0qt+/nE2IFJda01ST7
 7FEtDovj3zd/S+pUq/OOpCsmSzHUA7LJuS5rxEm0I5t5tMde/GUjVHkQh4NseE3czFI5
 sYXRZcsiT/3upAgDluA1sYtFiD4Ly/cwin6XSiZqjX/USnrlB0Mv3J4gnoqJg2567FaK
 Jf4alohQJQMHSNCRnUFi6panrsVJnUq+7gWLArvVuyd+HM8cKF+RvxK3GsZrp5ygcZ5+
 en3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=sZHUHspXR2mOUsW8lfvNqMEG83ATBCPZVvVQRLGzml8=;
 b=q3nwJ7nUo8A6SCxdo2jbgyl6Ss09nCLJQ/tJzJDO5Z26THXCLRE+jL/p8LfO7k0Jho
 MHCUD+iznb2a23RnV7fKQVVN7zSfa5+4Sm2Ik36oCqdvjzHu+yTfaPBiH4QhdRqheAy6
 zOXNCdxBYFkB2Bu4uX2blIME9JognS+4aGkDRVvAXf7xzCGqVtpsFVpXEulVkexnioQ/
 MMLo7AEJEpbx65vHY2WZHdXltoiQm5yj9rCjHmdbPntd/PPY6xgXEkw2Qi6Bf6udP85q
 ZIPDHZ7CxFTxGzz1NcAQCbU/6sS2NpSACi4n17miF4vykYeuQ0Z8iXUvIntgc1aYrndA
 v6lQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532a7DXM7/O0EA1LVu6dhhJ0z+pHAqcYoaqxvPcZ+UCKT6cswG1U
 ihyseYZiOEJ6pqNDBwznfsxsm/V8dWsDmg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOWHlBPOMpZ8igY+5mWS16tbiK1sjNPLl9BWUpzWrvkCDMjDCMPpMlOjSGTjA+0Lk/fF/PbQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1d82:: with SMTP id d124mr3495589wmd.12.1605775597837; 
 Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:46:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d15sm5876810wrx.93.2020.11.19.00.46.36
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:46:37 -0800 (PST)
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable
 (502)
In-Reply-To: <878saxixf9.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN>
 <878saxixf9.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:43:36 +0100
Message-ID: <86blft3fev.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723
Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi,
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 09:05, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote:

>> Does it make sense to only keep the latest?  And GC all the older one
>> except the stable one (pinned).
>
> We could change =E2=80=98cleanup-cuirass-roots=E2=80=99 (the mcron job I =
showed) to keep
> at least one =E2=80=98hurd-barebones.qcow2=E2=80=99 root.  Help welcome!

Where is the configuration?  Repo maintenance?  Elsewhere?

All the beest,
simon




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#44723; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2020 08:05:40 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 19 03:05:40 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38015 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kfewm-0003Jn-6A
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:05:40 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40458)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfewk-0003JZ-Np
 for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:05:39 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47917)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kfewf-0004TK-HA; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:05:33 -0500
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=52988 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kfewe-000125-HS; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:05:32 -0500
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable
 (502)
References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 29 Brumaire an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:05:30 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN>
 (zimoun's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:50:03 +0100")
Message-ID: <878saxixf9.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723
Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> skribis:

> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 18:46, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote:
>
>> I guess it=E2=80=99s OK for Guix System ISO images because a fresh one g=
ets
>> built at each evaluation, roughly, but perhaps the Hurd images are not
>> rebuilt frequently enough and the changes that they=E2=80=99re GC=E2=80=
=99d are higher.
>>
>> I don=E2=80=99t have a good solution for that, we=E2=80=99re consuming s=
torage space too
>> quickly with all these images currently.  :-/
>
> Does it make sense to only keep the latest?  And GC all the older one
> except the stable one (pinned).

We could change =E2=80=98cleanup-cuirass-roots=E2=80=99 (the mcron job I sh=
owed) to keep
at least one =E2=80=98hurd-barebones.qcow2=E2=80=99 root.  Help welcome!

Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#44723; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 20:14:09 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 15:14:09 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36569 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kfTqD-0001n5-9d
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:14:09 -0500
Received: from imta-35.everyone.net ([216.200.145.35]:42786
 helo=imta-38.everyone.net)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <bokr@HIDDEN>) id 1kfTqA-0001mw-Ri
 for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:14:07 -0500
Received: from pps.filterd (m0004961.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
 by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 0AIK2sJq025963;
 Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:14:05 -0800
X-Eon-Originating-Account: x5FHpmYZonyXjFBM9o-NytcvKq_1znB6-gIAOjngVPk
X-Eon-Dm: m0117124.ppops.net
Received: by m0117124.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 53b92589)
 id m0117124.5f8a0284.6195e8; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:14:04 -0800
X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJftYCMe/dG/AIAAAAD,a4168ea89f005019468d83bfd0284e0a
X-Eip: ry-4th0OpTOYYA678Ficj2_xVYH-qWfytsEyZ7lKloc
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 21:13:55 +0100
From: Bengt Richter <bokr@HIDDEN>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable
 (502)
Message-ID: <20201118201355.GA2833@LionPure>
References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312, 18.0.737
 definitions=2020-11-18_08:2020-11-17,
 2020-11-18 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999
 spamscore=0
 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1034
 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0
 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000
 definitions=main-2011180140
X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723
Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Bengt Richter <bokr@HIDDEN>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)

Hi,

On +2020-11-18 18:50:03 +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 18:46, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote:
> 
> > I guess it’s OK for Guix System ISO images because a fresh one gets
> > built at each evaluation, roughly, but perhaps the Hurd images are not
> > rebuilt frequently enough and the changes that they’re GC’d are higher.
> >
> > I don’t have a good solution for that, we’re consuming storage space too
> > quickly with all these images currently.  :-/
>
Eric Blake from Red Hat is IIUC working on qemu features to share clean parts
of images without duplicating [1] and LWN has an article re his work [2]
(I hope posting this [2] subsriberlink here is Ok with LWN -- I would think so)

Perhaps their incremental chaining technology can help consolidate "all these images" ?

> Does it make sense to only keep the latest?  And GC all the older one
> except the stable one (pinned).
> 
> Cheers,
> simon
> 
> 
> 
[1] https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/kvmforum2020/92/kvmforum_2020_Bitmaps_and_NBD.pdf
[2] https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/837053/06072931fc4162bf/
    ([2] should be available freely to all as [3] in less than a week)
[3] https://lwn.net/Articles/837053/ 
-- 
Regards,
Bengt Richter




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#44723; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 19:16:27 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 14:16:27 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36531 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kfSwN-0000PQ-DZ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:16:27 -0500
Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:47790)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kfSw4-0000Ok-Ue
 for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:16:24 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018;
 bh=MOm0QgCwfJiKCy78PpIKexeIdHMJHx7oekGKUieGdGk=; h=date:in-reply-to:
 references:subject:cc:to:from; b=V34Jt8YPrO6UR/5WdqeMsLWMQtI0iT0CE/h8l
 zhEACi/wSM0tDrIReUZf/DPfKlwSbv5ksrI4FrHxOk9HFEa58E3BAMR6AEl5OwxQwaTm4+
 ygdM0kVjQ9EAi30tw3OXcQrR6zGB6DTkay9hKwYT9Ld8fRBoJcqzxGFuOvUwIrivYUvCQx
 8yW5GDWOK6ZjMEzrbQXuHj83lV7tfhifOvh3Fvc4g/s/285ErJFMPsjoE4c5YIkvwlkBXr
 E5d+cWwbXtZjBR9aduPkrSEdguKxrJuKk6mzfxwW1x5NtRWycADr2xusn+ipyfmwY8q5su
 OHTlrWP7/4nIYk5C2QGDDEN+A==
Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 102f106b
 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); 
 Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:16:13 +0000 (UTC)
BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default;
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable
 (502)
References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN>
In-reply-to: <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:16:03 +0100
Message-ID: <87sg96v5l8.fsf@nckx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723
Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>,
 bug-guix@HIDDEN
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Simon,

zimoun =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> Does it make sense to only keep the latest?  And GC all the=20
> older one
> except the stable one (pinned).

It absolutely makes sense.  But knowing how much of a baroque=20
spaghetti painting some of this stuff is behind the scenes, it=20
might not be as trivial as it sounds.

Kind regards,

T G-R

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX7Vy8w0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15P9QBAJJsgqgqjdizF2KF/XQx3cj+Sl6tWTxJUwsilmTO
hu8wAP9yF2+7gFwl69NlLvezkE1PTS+vKI+gNFiXlsGTGpO8AQ==
=Nvtn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#44723; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 19:16:25 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 14:16:25 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36529 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kfSwL-0000PH-4B
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:16:25 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50120)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kfSwI-0000P4-Sp
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:16:23 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42024)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kfSwH-0004nZ-6L
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:16:22 -0500
Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:57830)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kfSwB-0001dk-Vh; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:16:20 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018;
 bh=MOm0QgCwfJiKCy78PpIKexeIdHMJHx7oekGKUieGdGk=; h=date:in-reply-to:
 references:subject:cc:to:from; b=V34Jt8YPrO6UR/5WdqeMsLWMQtI0iT0CE/h8l
 zhEACi/wSM0tDrIReUZf/DPfKlwSbv5ksrI4FrHxOk9HFEa58E3BAMR6AEl5OwxQwaTm4+
 ygdM0kVjQ9EAi30tw3OXcQrR6zGB6DTkay9hKwYT9Ld8fRBoJcqzxGFuOvUwIrivYUvCQx
 8yW5GDWOK6ZjMEzrbQXuHj83lV7tfhifOvh3Fvc4g/s/285ErJFMPsjoE4c5YIkvwlkBXr
 E5d+cWwbXtZjBR9aduPkrSEdguKxrJuKk6mzfxwW1x5NtRWycADr2xusn+ipyfmwY8q5su
 OHTlrWP7/4nIYk5C2QGDDEN+A==
Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 102f106b
 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); 
 Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:16:13 +0000 (UTC)
BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default;
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable
 (502)
References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN>
In-reply-to: <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:16:03 +0100
Message-ID: <87sg96v5l8.fsf@nckx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@HIDDEN;
 helo=tobias.gr
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache.
 That's all we know.
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>,
 bug-guix@HIDDEN
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Simon,

zimoun =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> Does it make sense to only keep the latest?  And GC all the=20
> older one
> except the stable one (pinned).

It absolutely makes sense.  But knowing how much of a baroque=20
spaghetti painting some of this stuff is behind the scenes, it=20
might not be as trivial as it sounds.

Kind regards,

T G-R

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX7Vy8w0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15P9QBAJJsgqgqjdizF2KF/XQx3cj+Sl6tWTxJUwsilmTO
hu8wAP9yF2+7gFwl69NlLvezkE1PTS+vKI+gNFiXlsGTGpO8AQ==
=Nvtn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#44723; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 17:50:22 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 12:50:22 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36413 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kfRb4-0004ca-3I
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:50:22 -0500
Received: from mail-qt1-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:42317)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1kfRb2-0004cK-2k
 for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:50:20 -0500
Received: by mail-qt1-f174.google.com with SMTP id z3so2232912qtw.9
 for <44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:50:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=HwIBr3tQSpix1jXWn3l88SFmj0Pqjb9TYgI0EZHYT+Q=;
 b=FFyG/RhjYjOc70RZMEAjE7wsg0VlmhqrR+0vzJGnUGIn6dZEkWvXbhjjWTDF3xNQLf
 0Il5FL89L2Fc8d6V3vi47FODS6b3Fi8+pNzUY/mJwlvCbhXgzUvGAmG2GoaccQcahIPc
 8JgalLebfMebB5rVMbBGSlwfLunmpsusIkL4j29PfKJHJONn/tTBEi0jC5IXIo4ys2+I
 TtIaQcyDxp7s/fPPqrrZMV4o8D7/JNjHWLy+Au1sQb7gJQMiu6C5gt6baliytdx8uML0
 UcUGdRpqt2BhhdUZsk+nSDw3ukDUIXuDa4FCCb6znyXQCT11PBd54CWvUudXswve/NFr
 SxGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=HwIBr3tQSpix1jXWn3l88SFmj0Pqjb9TYgI0EZHYT+Q=;
 b=LNmM5SMANS2D674+JAk2Rte75gdmo7yTSHQfTiQgXAO4TeWFAKnjHx4IP7Lg8RaahT
 ghhjpsjEf583u6TCr8t4WfIiiiqCZ8SaQeBKv9QriVbmuatcxEfVoM/JHjbbkFGeokGk
 AcC8eJv6HYF1P978E6Wl9VvMoNd+QfgO3hAs6e99ewr2D6viuyJTKOUQQ79j/+3emadX
 q8OXsbKHpHPWenc5iGUcQX2Z220sd5aHSL17D3kWsV5L/QH7PRwwW0aQLDQ5tVWl2Dpq
 0gyoGeLm7KKnzD0vfxn9T/MZz63yM/ubEnE1evrS7jJPIcEYW47m0AwsY0CtQ/5/eSsP
 MxxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531EgcunlYcHO7rwQU0z2krDrCgS9MEYkD9P3rsDaFDBMn3mViZE
 RPuER/q5R0K3O6YoIXqr/uNuG7Xi+hWh0knClwIgmKUQ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyruDY5M60OsYcZyHG88H02qWD3Yja+hNrY48ehxyUZN84iovUnkMgWn/vr2RL+qF3tJfcKWUNQEJLLgHAtUoI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:188:: with SMTP id
 s8mr5438596qtw.186.1605721814505; 
 Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:50:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:50:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable
 (502)
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723
Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi,

On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 18:46, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote:

> I guess it=E2=80=99s OK for Guix System ISO images because a fresh one ge=
ts
> built at each evaluation, roughly, but perhaps the Hurd images are not
> rebuilt frequently enough and the changes that they=E2=80=99re GC=E2=80=
=99d are higher.
>
> I don=E2=80=99t have a good solution for that, we=E2=80=99re consuming st=
orage space too
> quickly with all these images currently.  :-/

Does it make sense to only keep the latest?  And GC all the older one
except the stable one (pinned).

Cheers,
simon




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#44723; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 17:45:20 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 12:45:20 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36393 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kfRWC-0004To-AO
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:20 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45620)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfRW9-0004TO-Sk
 for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:18 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58124)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kfRW3-0005YM-PP; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:11 -0500
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=60866 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kfRVv-0000YJ-CP; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:10 -0500
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable
 (502)
References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 28 Brumaire an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:45:01 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports
 for's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:39:53 +0100")
Message-ID: <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723
Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi,

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
skribis:

> The binary tarball and Hurd qcow2 links on
> <http://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/>, which resolve to=20
> <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/download/1385> and
> <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/download/1450> respectively, return 502.
>
> Here's why:
>
>  2020-11-18T17:31:24 GET /download/1450
>  Uncaught exception in fiber ##f:
>  In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>    1669:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>  ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
>  In procedure open-file: No such file or directory:
>  "/gnu/store/vd5y7hmvgqc1hwmqyiwqa171r0iz1wib-hurd-barebones.qcow2"
>
> The file really is gone.  It seems that Cuirass is no longer creating
> sufficient GC roots.  I vaguely remember some changes to image GC'ing
> being discussed but not what (if anything) changed.

QCOW2 images get GC=E2=80=99d rather quickly, because they take up a lot of
space; see in particular:

  https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=3D4a720=
a03f9d190f7b1abc883f49d51a95a5f58a9
  https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=3D0bf82=
02de811364ebd79e390fcd039f7936b6ea7

I guess it=E2=80=99s OK for Guix System ISO images because a fresh one gets
built at each evaluation, roughly, but perhaps the Hurd images are not
rebuilt frequently enough and the changes that they=E2=80=99re GC=E2=80=99d=
 are higher.

I don=E2=80=99t have a good solution for that, we=E2=80=99re consuming stor=
age space too
quickly with all these images currently.  :-/

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#44723; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 17:45:16 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 12:45:16 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36390 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kfRW7-0004TY-UZ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:16 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:51600)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfRW5-0004TQ-Pb
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:14 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45722)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfRW4-0000E7-Tm
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:13 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58124)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kfRW3-0005YM-PP; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:11 -0500
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=60866 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kfRVv-0000YJ-CP; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:10 -0500
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable
 (502)
References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 28 Brumaire an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:45:01 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports
 for's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:39:53 +0100")
Message-ID: <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi,

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
skribis:

> The binary tarball and Hurd qcow2 links on
> <http://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/>, which resolve to=20
> <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/download/1385> and
> <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/download/1450> respectively, return 502.
>
> Here's why:
>
>  2020-11-18T17:31:24 GET /download/1450
>  Uncaught exception in fiber ##f:
>  In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>    1669:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>  ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
>  In procedure open-file: No such file or directory:
>  "/gnu/store/vd5y7hmvgqc1hwmqyiwqa171r0iz1wib-hurd-barebones.qcow2"
>
> The file really is gone.  It seems that Cuirass is no longer creating
> sufficient GC roots.  I vaguely remember some changes to image GC'ing
> being discussed but not what (if anything) changed.

QCOW2 images get GC=E2=80=99d rather quickly, because they take up a lot of
space; see in particular:

  https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=3D4a720=
a03f9d190f7b1abc883f49d51a95a5f58a9
  https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=3D0bf82=
02de811364ebd79e390fcd039f7936b6ea7

I guess it=E2=80=99s OK for Guix System ISO images because a fresh one gets
built at each evaluation, roughly, but perhaps the Hurd images are not
rebuilt frequently enough and the changes that they=E2=80=99re GC=E2=80=99d=
 are higher.

I don=E2=80=99t have a good solution for that, we=E2=80=99re consuming stor=
age space too
quickly with all these images currently.  :-/

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#44723; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 16:40:12 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 11:40:12 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36200 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kfQV9-0000di-MO
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:40:11 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38162)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kfQV4-0000dX-MM
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:40:10 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55736)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kfQV4-00069V-AF
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:40:06 -0500
Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:40940)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kfQV2-0004yQ-6z
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:40:06 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018;
 bh=RcNFCPEO5jS+NsnzYlh5oCWm6Na3LFj/FimTnmJpQAY=; h=date:subject:to:
 from; b=guIiE6pHBj8RZ4zmTsjRLh4asZZSrHnu1sC6Gaa4kMXbL6tf8zemnHzogpps07
 WjsY2wxP0zdCE7yq2zMRLCJx1fTEmClqT3DI+9NaoeAnmTzrAxMQUtBT9UmT5a3TkNoAt7
 KvTTH0uv9nCCaL40jU0dP+SA4jubs+FeBWiVVBgxx87jYcEVBYnYLPZ8PHMxtpQNU+l1Iw
 m8MnsK1kykXjF48doriqNgl3IKj51etaIPtzm7WneWG2GwfX2b3vKhXg1HTd2WwmKMU8Q3
 D9Hwek6IjOBnosdTj7LT3pKzC1NL8lGPpW9znqWpOMNCcw2jrq95UV4c9KudLHjSg9Zhog
 ==
Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 72a9cfeb
 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO)
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 16:40:06 +0000 (UTC)
BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default;
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
To: Bug Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Subject: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable (502)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:39:53 +0100
Message-ID: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@HIDDEN;
 helo=tobias.gr
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache.
 That's all we know.
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

Guix,

The binary tarball and Hurd qcow2 links on 
<http://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/>, which resolve to 
<https://ci.guix.gnu.org/download/1385> and 
<https://ci.guix.gnu.org/download/1450> respectively, return 502.

Here's why:

  2020-11-18T17:31:24 GET /download/1450
  Uncaught exception in fiber ##f:
  In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
    1669:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
  ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
  In procedure open-file: No such file or directory:
  "/gnu/store/vd5y7hmvgqc1hwmqyiwqa171r0iz1wib-hurd-barebones.qcow2"

The file really is gone.  It seems that Cuirass is no longer 
creating sufficient GC roots.  I vaguely remember some changes to 
image GC'ing being discussed but not what (if anything) changed.

Thanks to zimoun for pointing out the broken links.

Kind regards,

T G-R

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX7VOWQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15C7wBAMBSliYVOfM/xiE/1XSBxMHNq86C2kD1GzqK7cp4
lLHKAQC04LAqqwJLLYBsIdkdYAyrdyJg053xzo+qjO7wruiYCA==
=pqAB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Acknowledgement sent to Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#44723; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:30:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.