Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2020 09:14:57 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 19 04:14:57 2020 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38165 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kfg1p-00054E-FZ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:14:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1kfg1l-00053y-PZ for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:14:55 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49035) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1kfg1g-0004Of-24; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:14:48 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:b0e9:5d53:5d5c:ccf2] (port=42894 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1kfg1e-0006dh-Ox; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:14:47 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN> To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable (502) References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN> <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN> <878saxixf9.fsf@HIDDEN> <86blft3fev.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:14:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86blft3fev.fsf@HIDDEN> (zimoun's message of "Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:43:36 +0100") Message-ID: <87mtzdpv22.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723 Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hey zimoun, > Where is the configuration? Repo maintenance? Elsewhere? Yes it's here: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/tree/hydra/modules/sysadmin/services.scm Thanks, Mathieu
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#44723; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2020 08:46:47 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 19 03:46:47 2020 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kffaZ-0004Kk-6Z for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:46:47 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com ([209.85.128.49]:38222) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1kffaW-0004KT-4R for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:46:45 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 1so5963679wme.3 for <44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:46:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sZHUHspXR2mOUsW8lfvNqMEG83ATBCPZVvVQRLGzml8=; b=aruKSBKIRj0xM+CuQN3cUj57fxVKtiyKjMKr7PB02hFBRx3UR4kSz0ISn+Qzhu0sEM Ief7ojhsadg0Ck/iBHp8QDxqJldR5Hm2b+Qfb7vzD++JZ6nUqY0qt+/nE2IFJda01ST7 7FEtDovj3zd/S+pUq/OOpCsmSzHUA7LJuS5rxEm0I5t5tMde/GUjVHkQh4NseE3czFI5 sYXRZcsiT/3upAgDluA1sYtFiD4Ly/cwin6XSiZqjX/USnrlB0Mv3J4gnoqJg2567FaK Jf4alohQJQMHSNCRnUFi6panrsVJnUq+7gWLArvVuyd+HM8cKF+RvxK3GsZrp5ygcZ5+ en3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sZHUHspXR2mOUsW8lfvNqMEG83ATBCPZVvVQRLGzml8=; b=q3nwJ7nUo8A6SCxdo2jbgyl6Ss09nCLJQ/tJzJDO5Z26THXCLRE+jL/p8LfO7k0Jho MHCUD+iznb2a23RnV7fKQVVN7zSfa5+4Sm2Ik36oCqdvjzHu+yTfaPBiH4QhdRqheAy6 zOXNCdxBYFkB2Bu4uX2blIME9JognS+4aGkDRVvAXf7xzCGqVtpsFVpXEulVkexnioQ/ MMLo7AEJEpbx65vHY2WZHdXltoiQm5yj9rCjHmdbPntd/PPY6xgXEkw2Qi6Bf6udP85q ZIPDHZ7CxFTxGzz1NcAQCbU/6sS2NpSACi4n17miF4vykYeuQ0Z8iXUvIntgc1aYrndA v6lQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532a7DXM7/O0EA1LVu6dhhJ0z+pHAqcYoaqxvPcZ+UCKT6cswG1U ihyseYZiOEJ6pqNDBwznfsxsm/V8dWsDmg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOWHlBPOMpZ8igY+5mWS16tbiK1sjNPLl9BWUpzWrvkCDMjDCMPpMlOjSGTjA+0Lk/fF/PbQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1d82:: with SMTP id d124mr3495589wmd.12.1605775597837; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:46:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d15sm5876810wrx.93.2020.11.19.00.46.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:46:37 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable (502) In-Reply-To: <878saxixf9.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN> <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN> <878saxixf9.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:43:36 +0100 Message-ID: <86blft3fev.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723 Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 09:05, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote: >> Does it make sense to only keep the latest? And GC all the older one >> except the stable one (pinned). > > We could change =E2=80=98cleanup-cuirass-roots=E2=80=99 (the mcron job I = showed) to keep > at least one =E2=80=98hurd-barebones.qcow2=E2=80=99 root. Help welcome! Where is the configuration? Repo maintenance? Elsewhere? All the beest, simon
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#44723; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2020 08:05:40 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 19 03:05:40 2020 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38015 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kfewm-0003Jn-6A for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:05:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfewk-0003JZ-Np for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:05:39 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47917) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfewf-0004TK-HA; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:05:33 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=52988 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfewe-000125-HS; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:05:32 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable (502) References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN> <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 29 Brumaire an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:05:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN> (zimoun's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:50:03 +0100") Message-ID: <878saxixf9.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723 Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> skribis: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 18:46, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote: > >> I guess it=E2=80=99s OK for Guix System ISO images because a fresh one g= ets >> built at each evaluation, roughly, but perhaps the Hurd images are not >> rebuilt frequently enough and the changes that they=E2=80=99re GC=E2=80= =99d are higher. >> >> I don=E2=80=99t have a good solution for that, we=E2=80=99re consuming s= torage space too >> quickly with all these images currently. :-/ > > Does it make sense to only keep the latest? And GC all the older one > except the stable one (pinned). We could change =E2=80=98cleanup-cuirass-roots=E2=80=99 (the mcron job I sh= owed) to keep at least one =E2=80=98hurd-barebones.qcow2=E2=80=99 root. Help welcome! Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#44723; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 20:14:09 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 15:14:09 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36569 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1kfTqD-0001n5-9d
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:14:09 -0500
Received: from imta-35.everyone.net ([216.200.145.35]:42786
helo=imta-38.everyone.net)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <bokr@HIDDEN>) id 1kfTqA-0001mw-Ri
for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:14:07 -0500
Received: from pps.filterd (m0004961.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 0AIK2sJq025963;
Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:14:05 -0800
X-Eon-Originating-Account: x5FHpmYZonyXjFBM9o-NytcvKq_1znB6-gIAOjngVPk
X-Eon-Dm: m0117124.ppops.net
Received: by m0117124.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 53b92589)
id m0117124.5f8a0284.6195e8; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:14:04 -0800
X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJftYCMe/dG/AIAAAAD,a4168ea89f005019468d83bfd0284e0a
X-Eip: ry-4th0OpTOYYA678Ficj2_xVYH-qWfytsEyZ7lKloc
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 21:13:55 +0100
From: Bengt Richter <bokr@HIDDEN>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable
(502)
Message-ID: <20201118201355.GA2833@LionPure>
References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN>
<CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312, 18.0.737
definitions=2020-11-18_08:2020-11-17,
2020-11-18 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999
spamscore=0
lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1034
malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0
classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000
definitions=main-2011180140
X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723
Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Bengt Richter <bokr@HIDDEN>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
Hi,
On +2020-11-18 18:50:03 +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 18:46, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote:
>
> > I guess it’s OK for Guix System ISO images because a fresh one gets
> > built at each evaluation, roughly, but perhaps the Hurd images are not
> > rebuilt frequently enough and the changes that they’re GC’d are higher.
> >
> > I don’t have a good solution for that, we’re consuming storage space too
> > quickly with all these images currently. :-/
>
Eric Blake from Red Hat is IIUC working on qemu features to share clean parts
of images without duplicating [1] and LWN has an article re his work [2]
(I hope posting this [2] subsriberlink here is Ok with LWN -- I would think so)
Perhaps their incremental chaining technology can help consolidate "all these images" ?
> Does it make sense to only keep the latest? And GC all the older one
> except the stable one (pinned).
>
> Cheers,
> simon
>
>
>
[1] https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/kvmforum2020/92/kvmforum_2020_Bitmaps_and_NBD.pdf
[2] https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/837053/06072931fc4162bf/
([2] should be available freely to all as [3] in less than a week)
[3] https://lwn.net/Articles/837053/
--
Regards,
Bengt Richter
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#44723; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 19:16:27 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 14:16:27 2020 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36531 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kfSwN-0000PQ-DZ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:16:27 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:47790) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kfSw4-0000Ok-Ue for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:16:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=MOm0QgCwfJiKCy78PpIKexeIdHMJHx7oekGKUieGdGk=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=V34Jt8YPrO6UR/5WdqeMsLWMQtI0iT0CE/h8l zhEACi/wSM0tDrIReUZf/DPfKlwSbv5ksrI4FrHxOk9HFEa58E3BAMR6AEl5OwxQwaTm4+ ygdM0kVjQ9EAi30tw3OXcQrR6zGB6DTkay9hKwYT9Ld8fRBoJcqzxGFuOvUwIrivYUvCQx 8yW5GDWOK6ZjMEzrbQXuHj83lV7tfhifOvh3Fvc4g/s/285ErJFMPsjoE4c5YIkvwlkBXr E5d+cWwbXtZjBR9aduPkrSEdguKxrJuKk6mzfxwW1x5NtRWycADr2xusn+ipyfmwY8q5su OHTlrWP7/4nIYk5C2QGDDEN+A== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 102f106b (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:16:13 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable (502) References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN> <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN> In-reply-to: <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:16:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87sg96v5l8.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723 Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, bug-guix@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Simon, zimoun =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Does it make sense to only keep the latest? And GC all the=20 > older one > except the stable one (pinned). It absolutely makes sense. But knowing how much of a baroque=20 spaghetti painting some of this stuff is behind the scenes, it=20 might not be as trivial as it sounds. Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX7Vy8w0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15P9QBAJJsgqgqjdizF2KF/XQx3cj+Sl6tWTxJUwsilmTO hu8wAP9yF2+7gFwl69NlLvezkE1PTS+vKI+gNFiXlsGTGpO8AQ== =Nvtn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#44723; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 19:16:25 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 14:16:25 2020 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36529 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kfSwL-0000PH-4B for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:16:25 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50120) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kfSwI-0000P4-Sp for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:16:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42024) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kfSwH-0004nZ-6L for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:16:22 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:57830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kfSwB-0001dk-Vh; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:16:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=MOm0QgCwfJiKCy78PpIKexeIdHMJHx7oekGKUieGdGk=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=V34Jt8YPrO6UR/5WdqeMsLWMQtI0iT0CE/h8l zhEACi/wSM0tDrIReUZf/DPfKlwSbv5ksrI4FrHxOk9HFEa58E3BAMR6AEl5OwxQwaTm4+ ygdM0kVjQ9EAi30tw3OXcQrR6zGB6DTkay9hKwYT9Ld8fRBoJcqzxGFuOvUwIrivYUvCQx 8yW5GDWOK6ZjMEzrbQXuHj83lV7tfhifOvh3Fvc4g/s/285ErJFMPsjoE4c5YIkvwlkBXr E5d+cWwbXtZjBR9aduPkrSEdguKxrJuKk6mzfxwW1x5NtRWycADr2xusn+ipyfmwY8q5su OHTlrWP7/4nIYk5C2QGDDEN+A== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 102f106b (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:16:13 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable (502) References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN> <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN> In-reply-to: <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:16:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87sg96v5l8.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@HIDDEN; helo=tobias.gr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, bug-guix@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Simon, zimoun =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Does it make sense to only keep the latest? And GC all the=20 > older one > except the stable one (pinned). It absolutely makes sense. But knowing how much of a baroque=20 spaghetti painting some of this stuff is behind the scenes, it=20 might not be as trivial as it sounds. Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX7Vy8w0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15P9QBAJJsgqgqjdizF2KF/XQx3cj+Sl6tWTxJUwsilmTO hu8wAP9yF2+7gFwl69NlLvezkE1PTS+vKI+gNFiXlsGTGpO8AQ== =Nvtn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#44723; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 17:50:22 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 12:50:22 2020 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36413 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kfRb4-0004ca-3I for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:50:22 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:42317) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1kfRb2-0004cK-2k for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:50:20 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f174.google.com with SMTP id z3so2232912qtw.9 for <44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:50:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HwIBr3tQSpix1jXWn3l88SFmj0Pqjb9TYgI0EZHYT+Q=; b=FFyG/RhjYjOc70RZMEAjE7wsg0VlmhqrR+0vzJGnUGIn6dZEkWvXbhjjWTDF3xNQLf 0Il5FL89L2Fc8d6V3vi47FODS6b3Fi8+pNzUY/mJwlvCbhXgzUvGAmG2GoaccQcahIPc 8JgalLebfMebB5rVMbBGSlwfLunmpsusIkL4j29PfKJHJONn/tTBEi0jC5IXIo4ys2+I TtIaQcyDxp7s/fPPqrrZMV4o8D7/JNjHWLy+Au1sQb7gJQMiu6C5gt6baliytdx8uML0 UcUGdRpqt2BhhdUZsk+nSDw3ukDUIXuDa4FCCb6znyXQCT11PBd54CWvUudXswve/NFr SxGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HwIBr3tQSpix1jXWn3l88SFmj0Pqjb9TYgI0EZHYT+Q=; b=LNmM5SMANS2D674+JAk2Rte75gdmo7yTSHQfTiQgXAO4TeWFAKnjHx4IP7Lg8RaahT ghhjpsjEf583u6TCr8t4WfIiiiqCZ8SaQeBKv9QriVbmuatcxEfVoM/JHjbbkFGeokGk AcC8eJv6HYF1P978E6Wl9VvMoNd+QfgO3hAs6e99ewr2D6viuyJTKOUQQ79j/+3emadX q8OXsbKHpHPWenc5iGUcQX2Z220sd5aHSL17D3kWsV5L/QH7PRwwW0aQLDQ5tVWl2Dpq 0gyoGeLm7KKnzD0vfxn9T/MZz63yM/ubEnE1evrS7jJPIcEYW47m0AwsY0CtQ/5/eSsP MxxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531EgcunlYcHO7rwQU0z2krDrCgS9MEYkD9P3rsDaFDBMn3mViZE RPuER/q5R0K3O6YoIXqr/uNuG7Xi+hWh0knClwIgmKUQ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyruDY5M60OsYcZyHG88H02qWD3Yja+hNrY48ehxyUZN84iovUnkMgWn/vr2RL+qF3tJfcKWUNQEJLLgHAtUoI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:188:: with SMTP id s8mr5438596qtw.186.1605721814505; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:50:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN> From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:50:03 +0100 Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ3fawBARjyc+0q-hG468MooXEk2Gy5c38YG89VqErhM7A@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable (502) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723 Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 18:46, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote: > I guess it=E2=80=99s OK for Guix System ISO images because a fresh one ge= ts > built at each evaluation, roughly, but perhaps the Hurd images are not > rebuilt frequently enough and the changes that they=E2=80=99re GC=E2=80= =99d are higher. > > I don=E2=80=99t have a good solution for that, we=E2=80=99re consuming st= orage space too > quickly with all these images currently. :-/ Does it make sense to only keep the latest? And GC all the older one except the stable one (pinned). Cheers, simon
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#44723; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 44723) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 17:45:20 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 12:45:20 2020 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36393 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kfRWC-0004To-AO for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45620) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfRW9-0004TO-Sk for 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:18 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfRW3-0005YM-PP; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:11 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=60866 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfRVv-0000YJ-CP; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:10 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable (502) References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 28 Brumaire an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:45:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:39:53 +0100") Message-ID: <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44723 Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> skribis: > The binary tarball and Hurd qcow2 links on > <http://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/>, which resolve to=20 > <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/download/1385> and > <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/download/1450> respectively, return 502. > > Here's why: > > 2020-11-18T17:31:24 GET /download/1450 > Uncaught exception in fiber ##f: > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1669:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception: > In procedure open-file: No such file or directory: > "/gnu/store/vd5y7hmvgqc1hwmqyiwqa171r0iz1wib-hurd-barebones.qcow2" > > The file really is gone. It seems that Cuirass is no longer creating > sufficient GC roots. I vaguely remember some changes to image GC'ing > being discussed but not what (if anything) changed. QCOW2 images get GC=E2=80=99d rather quickly, because they take up a lot of space; see in particular: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=3D4a720= a03f9d190f7b1abc883f49d51a95a5f58a9 https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=3D0bf82= 02de811364ebd79e390fcd039f7936b6ea7 I guess it=E2=80=99s OK for Guix System ISO images because a fresh one gets built at each evaluation, roughly, but perhaps the Hurd images are not rebuilt frequently enough and the changes that they=E2=80=99re GC=E2=80=99d= are higher. I don=E2=80=99t have a good solution for that, we=E2=80=99re consuming stor= age space too quickly with all these images currently. :-/ Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#44723; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 17:45:16 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 12:45:16 2020 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36390 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kfRW7-0004TY-UZ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:16 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:51600) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfRW5-0004TQ-Pb for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45722) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfRW4-0000E7-Tm for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:13 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfRW3-0005YM-PP; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:11 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=60866 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kfRVv-0000YJ-CP; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:45:10 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#44723: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable (502) References: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 28 Brumaire an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:45:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:39:53 +0100") Message-ID: <875z62muea.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 44723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> skribis: > The binary tarball and Hurd qcow2 links on > <http://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/>, which resolve to=20 > <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/download/1385> and > <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/download/1450> respectively, return 502. > > Here's why: > > 2020-11-18T17:31:24 GET /download/1450 > Uncaught exception in fiber ##f: > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1669:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception: > In procedure open-file: No such file or directory: > "/gnu/store/vd5y7hmvgqc1hwmqyiwqa171r0iz1wib-hurd-barebones.qcow2" > > The file really is gone. It seems that Cuirass is no longer creating > sufficient GC roots. I vaguely remember some changes to image GC'ing > being discussed but not what (if anything) changed. QCOW2 images get GC=E2=80=99d rather quickly, because they take up a lot of space; see in particular: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=3D4a720= a03f9d190f7b1abc883f49d51a95a5f58a9 https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=3D0bf82= 02de811364ebd79e390fcd039f7936b6ea7 I guess it=E2=80=99s OK for Guix System ISO images because a fresh one gets built at each evaluation, roughly, but perhaps the Hurd images are not rebuilt frequently enough and the changes that they=E2=80=99re GC=E2=80=99d= are higher. I don=E2=80=99t have a good solution for that, we=E2=80=99re consuming stor= age space too quickly with all these images currently. :-/ Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#44723; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 16:40:12 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 11:40:12 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36200 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1kfQV9-0000di-MO
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:40:11 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38162)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kfQV4-0000dX-MM
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:40:10 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55736)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kfQV4-00069V-AF
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:40:06 -0500
Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:40940)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kfQV2-0004yQ-6z
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:40:06 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018;
bh=RcNFCPEO5jS+NsnzYlh5oCWm6Na3LFj/FimTnmJpQAY=; h=date:subject:to:
from; b=guIiE6pHBj8RZ4zmTsjRLh4asZZSrHnu1sC6Gaa4kMXbL6tf8zemnHzogpps07
WjsY2wxP0zdCE7yq2zMRLCJx1fTEmClqT3DI+9NaoeAnmTzrAxMQUtBT9UmT5a3TkNoAt7
KvTTH0uv9nCCaL40jU0dP+SA4jubs+FeBWiVVBgxx87jYcEVBYnYLPZ8PHMxtpQNU+l1Iw
m8MnsK1kykXjF48doriqNgl3IKj51etaIPtzm7WneWG2GwfX2b3vKhXg1HTd2WwmKMU8Q3
D9Hwek6IjOBnosdTj7LT3pKzC1NL8lGPpW9znqWpOMNCcw2jrq95UV4c9KudLHjSg9Zhog
==
Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 72a9cfeb
(TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO)
for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 16:40:06 +0000 (UTC)
BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default;
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
To: Bug Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Subject: Latest binary tarball & Hurd qcow2 image unavailable (502)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:39:53 +0100
Message-ID: <87y2iyvcti.fsf@nckx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@HIDDEN;
helo=tobias.gr
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache.
That's all we know.
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Guix,
The binary tarball and Hurd qcow2 links on
<http://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/>, which resolve to
<https://ci.guix.gnu.org/download/1385> and
<https://ci.guix.gnu.org/download/1450> respectively, return 502.
Here's why:
2020-11-18T17:31:24 GET /download/1450
Uncaught exception in fiber ##f:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1669:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
In procedure open-file: No such file or directory:
"/gnu/store/vd5y7hmvgqc1hwmqyiwqa171r0iz1wib-hurd-barebones.qcow2"
The file really is gone. It seems that Cuirass is no longer
creating sufficient GC roots. I vaguely remember some changes to
image GC'ing being discussed but not what (if anything) changed.
Thanks to zimoun for pointing out the broken links.
Kind regards,
T G-R
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX7VOWQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15C7wBAMBSliYVOfM/xiE/1XSBxMHNq86C2kD1GzqK7cp4
lLHKAQC04LAqqwJLLYBsIdkdYAyrdyJg053xzo+qjO7wruiYCA==
=pqAB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#44723; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.