GNU logs - #44953, boring messages


Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs)
Resent-From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:04:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.44953.B.16066838401313 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 44953
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16066838401313
          (code B ref -1); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:04:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2020 21:04:00 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52762 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kjTrR-0000L2-V8
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:04:00 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39828)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1kjTrJ-0000Kc-Br
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:53 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59668)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1kjTrJ-0004eO-3p
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:49 -0500
Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:55058)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1kjTrD-0000qN-7u
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:48 -0500
Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kjTqz-0005wa-KA; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:29 -0500
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:02:47 -0500
Message-ID: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.112.178.59; envelope-from=mhw@HIDDEN;
 helo=world.peace.net
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

In the 'lsof' test suite, the 'LTlock' test consistently fails on my
system, possibly related to the fact that I use 'btrfs' for my local
filesystems.  Here's the relevant build log excerpt:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Optional tests:
LTbigf ... OK
LTdnlc ... /tmp/guix-build-lsof-4.94.0.drv-0/lsof-4.94.0-checkout/tests found: 100.00%
           OK
LTlock ... lock mismatch: expected W, got " "
           lock mismatch: expected R, got " "
           lock mismatch: expected w, got " "
           lock mismatch: expected r, got " "
Failed tests: 1

make: *** [Makefile:118: opt] Error 1
command "make" "standard" "optional" failed with status 2
note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-lsof-4.94.0.drv-0'
builder for `/gnu/store/cgkl1prkfmaz7b7j37xlzyhh8nhqkdyw-lsof-4.94.0.drv' failed with exit code 1
build of /gnu/store/cgkl1prkfmaz7b7j37xlzyhh8nhqkdyw-lsof-4.94.0.drv failed
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The following commit made this into a fatal build error, which I agree
is an improvement:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
commit 2bf502138c9c8cad945866061772fe0e1f4b7175
Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Date:   Mon Nov 23 05:05:41 2020 +0100

  gnu: lsof: Make test failures fatal.
  
  * gnu/packages/lsof.scm (lsof)[source]: Add patch to make test suite
  failures stop the build.
  * gnu/packages/patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch: New file.
  * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Previously, the same test failure occurred on my system with lsof-4.91,
but the failure was ignored and I didn't notice it until now.  Before
that, our lsof-4.89 package did not run the test suite, so I do not know
if it had the same bug.

     Mark




Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#44953: Acknowledgement (lsof: LTlock test consistently fails
 (possibly due to btrfs))
Message-ID: <handler.44953.B.16066838401313.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 44953
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:04:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
44953: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D44953
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems


Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs)
References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN>
Resent-From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:27:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.44953.B44953.16066851633274 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 44953-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B44953.16066851633274
          (code B ref 44953); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:27:02 +0000
Received: (at 44953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2020 21:26:03 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52774 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kjUCo-0000qk-W7
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:26:03 -0500
Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:37598)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1kjUCn-0000qF-MP
 for 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:26:02 -0500
Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kjUCh-0006NN-7w; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:25:55 -0500
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:25:13 -0500
Message-ID: <87wny3dfe3.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

I should mention that 'gnome' depends on 'lsof' via the following
dependency path (among others):

gnome -> gnome-shell -> ruby-sass -> ruby-sass-spec -> ruby-terminfo ->
   ruby-rdoc -> ruby-rubocop -> ruby-parallel -> lsof

      Mark




Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs)
Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:34:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.44953.B.16066855973959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Cc: 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@HIDDEN, 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16066855973959
          (code B ref -1); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:34:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2020 21:33:17 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52782 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kjUJp-00011m-0H
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:17 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60138)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kjUJn-00011f-Fq
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:15 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35806)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kjUJn-0006u3-8e
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:15 -0500
Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:57746)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kjUJl-0002Ks-1h
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:14 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018;
 bh=awLYcMJp3wtgYf7DYBiJ17Zp/ro5qgz1k0r1aHB+VEI=; h=date:in-reply-to:
 references:subject:cc:to:from; b=A09MKSgPNZ39fe1caQomcVPTMSDedGL8Q9Dj2
 RWL+8vOEBO44a7gmoSui8R1c/8hZ5b2ZzcQZJfj2t7ygWCRbyQmFLwjSD5Bw5xkCdzzOso
 dNi+9ZeyuI1Hkm6xnr71QP007SId8X5a9/uKyG8mkp8jTVSFEE23mgO4YfQL06IWcuK4J/
 zmEApcJFG9kQ5s9Ob8qh6e+Vtho9B9SyS45pyCqe2h4nQnnXS8t+tJORsfsS7Bszuy16RH
 wwFZCkOd+WOgCEYY5NaaF/ry6CGTYeyLNddMz/nq/26kyJYsWZ8zt7EXHkhpNm9gcfkELI
 hCrUaIWuKjPnkhJvxXnWNyh2A==
Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 23d08061
 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); 
 Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:33:22 +0000 (UTC)
BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default;
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-reply-to: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 22:33:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@HIDDEN;
 helo=tobias.gr
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mark,

Mark H Weaver =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> In the 'lsof' test suite, the 'LTlock' test consistently fails=20
> on my
> system, possibly related to the fact that I use 'btrfs' for my=20
> local
> filesystems.

Thanks for the report!  I can reproduce this by formatting a btrfs=20
image file and loop-mounting it to /tmp.

This looks like an upstream bug to me.  Do you have time to file=20
one?  We're using the <https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof> upstream=20
since Victor Abell retired.

Alternatively we could disable this test in Guix =E2=80=98for now=E2=80=99 =
with a=20
comment--but we both know how long it will remain unfixed.

Side note: I tried to implement upstream's test workflow[0] but=20
got new failures (i.e. we're not running all the tests yet).  I=20
haven't tried fixing those yet.

Kind regards,

T G-R

[0]:=20
https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/pull/144#issuecomment-732204193

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX8QTkQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15IcAA/0Q+oA76FwdyxAASLpvDtTBJJIZuivTWpLs1dCMI
KPtWAQDBYcCYfqjkTTw9tFviD11U38ePYC3oxSE1RlBgt0AhAA==
=msE2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs)
Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:34:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.44953.B44953.16066855943942 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Cc: 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@HIDDEN, 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 44953-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B44953.16066855943942
          (code B ref 44953); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:34:02 +0000
Received: (at 44953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2020 21:33:14 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52779 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kjUJl-00011W-Pk
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:13 -0500
Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:47700)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <me@HIDDEN>) id 1kjUJj-00011M-Qk
 for 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:12 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018;
 bh=awLYcMJp3wtgYf7DYBiJ17Zp/ro5qgz1k0r1aHB+VEI=; h=date:in-reply-to:
 references:subject:cc:to:from; b=A09MKSgPNZ39fe1caQomcVPTMSDedGL8Q9Dj2
 RWL+8vOEBO44a7gmoSui8R1c/8hZ5b2ZzcQZJfj2t7ygWCRbyQmFLwjSD5Bw5xkCdzzOso
 dNi+9ZeyuI1Hkm6xnr71QP007SId8X5a9/uKyG8mkp8jTVSFEE23mgO4YfQL06IWcuK4J/
 zmEApcJFG9kQ5s9Ob8qh6e+Vtho9B9SyS45pyCqe2h4nQnnXS8t+tJORsfsS7Bszuy16RH
 wwFZCkOd+WOgCEYY5NaaF/ry6CGTYeyLNddMz/nq/26kyJYsWZ8zt7EXHkhpNm9gcfkELI
 hCrUaIWuKjPnkhJvxXnWNyh2A==
Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 23d08061
 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); 
 Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:33:22 +0000 (UTC)
BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default;
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-reply-to: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 22:33:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mark,

Mark H Weaver =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> In the 'lsof' test suite, the 'LTlock' test consistently fails=20
> on my
> system, possibly related to the fact that I use 'btrfs' for my=20
> local
> filesystems.

Thanks for the report!  I can reproduce this by formatting a btrfs=20
image file and loop-mounting it to /tmp.

This looks like an upstream bug to me.  Do you have time to file=20
one?  We're using the <https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof> upstream=20
since Victor Abell retired.

Alternatively we could disable this test in Guix =E2=80=98for now=E2=80=99 =
with a=20
comment--but we both know how long it will remain unfixed.

Side note: I tried to implement upstream's test workflow[0] but=20
got new failures (i.e. we're not running all the tests yet).  I=20
haven't tried fixing those yet.

Kind regards,

T G-R

[0]:=20
https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/pull/144#issuecomment-732204193

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX8QTkQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15IcAA/0Q+oA76FwdyxAASLpvDtTBJJIZuivTWpLs1dCMI
KPtWAQDBYcCYfqjkTTw9tFviD11U38ePYC3oxSE1RlBgt0AhAA==
=msE2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs)
Resent-From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:32:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.44953.B.160669987925745 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Cc: 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@HIDDEN, 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.160669987925745
          (code B ref -1); Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:32:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2020 01:31:19 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52955 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kjY2B-0006hA-4e
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:31:19 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:54936)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1kjY26-0006gs-0L
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:31:14 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50286)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1kjY25-0005cj-Q9
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:31:13 -0500
Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:34188)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1kjY21-0007bv-Qx
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:31:13 -0500
Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kjY1x-0002bl-G6; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:31:05 -0500
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx>
References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN> <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:30:20 -0500
Message-ID: <87r1obd41k.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.112.178.59; envelope-from=mhw@HIDDEN;
 helo=world.peace.net
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

Hi Tobias,

Thanks for the super quick response and for reproducing the bug.

> This looks like an upstream bug to me.

Agreed.

> Do you have time to file=20
> one?  We're using the <https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof> upstream=20
> since Victor Abell retired.

I have time, but there's another problem: it appears that I cannot file
a bug report on Github without first creating an account, which in turn
requires me to formally agree to their legal agreement.  Among other
things, it includes an indemnification clause, meaning that I would have
to promise to pay their legal fees if some dispute arises involving me
and they decide to retain laywers to deal with it.  They also claim the
right to change the terms of the agreement at any time without notifying
me, and by continuing to use the service I would implicitly agree to
those new terms.

I refuse to sign that agreement, which means that I cannot file bug
reports on Github.  Oh well.

I don't actually care about 'lsof', except for the fact that our 'gnome'
package depends on it.  For now, I'll just disable the 'lsof' test suite
on my private branch.

> Alternatively we could disable this test in Guix =E2=80=98for now=E2=80=
=99 with a
> comment--but we both know how long it will remain unfixed.

Sounds fine to me, unless someone who has already has a Github account
wants to use it to file a bug.

  Thanks again,
      Mark




Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs)
Resent-From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:32:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.44953.B44953.160669987525733 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Cc: 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@HIDDEN, 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 44953-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B44953.160669987525733
          (code B ref 44953); Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:32:02 +0000
Received: (at 44953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2020 01:31:15 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52953 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kjY26-0006gz-U8
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:31:15 -0500
Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:44340)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1kjY25-0006gh-JO
 for 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:31:13 -0500
Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kjY1x-0002bl-G6; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:31:05 -0500
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx>
References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN> <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:30:20 -0500
Message-ID: <87r1obd41k.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi Tobias,

Thanks for the super quick response and for reproducing the bug.

> This looks like an upstream bug to me.

Agreed.

> Do you have time to file=20
> one?  We're using the <https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof> upstream=20
> since Victor Abell retired.

I have time, but there's another problem: it appears that I cannot file
a bug report on Github without first creating an account, which in turn
requires me to formally agree to their legal agreement.  Among other
things, it includes an indemnification clause, meaning that I would have
to promise to pay their legal fees if some dispute arises involving me
and they decide to retain laywers to deal with it.  They also claim the
right to change the terms of the agreement at any time without notifying
me, and by continuing to use the service I would implicitly agree to
those new terms.

I refuse to sign that agreement, which means that I cannot file bug
reports on Github.  Oh well.

I don't actually care about 'lsof', except for the fact that our 'gnome'
package depends on it.  For now, I'll just disable the 'lsof' test suite
on my private branch.

> Alternatively we could disable this test in Guix =E2=80=98for now=E2=80=
=99 with a
> comment--but we both know how long it will remain unfixed.

Sounds fine to me, unless someone who has already has a Github account
wants to use it to file a bug.

  Thanks again,
      Mark




Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs)
Resent-From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 02:02:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.44953.B44953.160713367313696 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>, 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 44953-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B44953.160713367313696
          (code B ref 44953); Sat, 05 Dec 2020 02:02:01 +0000
Received: (at 44953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2020 02:01:13 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46242 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1klMsr-0003Yq-CI
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 21:01:13 -0500
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:41038)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1klMsl-0003Ye-6T
 for 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 21:01:11 -0500
Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Cnt8c42dRzFd7h;
 Fri,  4 Dec 2020 18:01:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1607133664; bh=HncSRmfF2IFxQsz5uqYIOLUOqSZEjIuidOhb7x8gNZ0=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=lTKzBLmnq6xKdwJrWtuI/NeG5/kHEhVW4Cgw2aoyeQAVRYA3FRGlRS4jvw5G56Ovj
 fBPhmA1z+2J2anIvNn0YYnpHPpljhsPz7W3zl7bH3ogCiLXlQY5yMs3KL2+JXUmfig
 xnQwOxn4/J+46VkLhFwBTknXlakPNAaxRQF1gDLI=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 400ED16BBD707AD9FED00AF9D574A500520AE4C69580575C79C834FA275788A6
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Cnt8Y2sv0zJn9m;
 Fri,  4 Dec 2020 18:00:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 02:57:36 +0100
From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <20201205025736.50b83726@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87r1obd41k.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN> <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx>
 <87r1obd41k.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:30:20 -0500
Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> wrote:

> Hi Tobias,
>=20
> Thanks for the super quick response and for reproducing the bug.
>=20
> > This looks like an upstream bug to me. =20
>=20
> Agreed.
>=20
> > Do you have time to file=20
> > one?  We're using the <https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof> upstream=20
> > since Victor Abell retired. =20
>=20
> I have time, but there's another problem: it appears that I cannot
> file a bug report on Github without first creating an account, which
> in turn requires me to formally agree to their legal agreement.
> Among other things, it includes an indemnification clause, meaning
> that I would have to promise to pay their legal fees if some dispute
> arises involving me and they decide to retain laywers to deal with
> it.  They also claim the right to change the terms of the agreement
> at any time without notifying me, and by continuing to use the
> service I would implicitly agree to those new terms.
>=20
> I refuse to sign that agreement, which means that I cannot file bug
> reports on Github.  Oh well.
>=20
> I don't actually care about 'lsof', except for the fact that our
> 'gnome' package depends on it.  For now, I'll just disable the 'lsof'
> test suite on my private branch.
>=20
> > Alternatively we could disable this test in Guix =E2=80=98for now=E2=80=
=99 with a
> > comment--but we both know how long it will remain unfixed. =20
>=20
> Sounds fine to me, unless someone who has already has a Github account
> wants to use it to file a bug.
>=20
>   Thanks again,
>       Mark
>=20
>=20
>=20

My usual workaround to this is to do a shallow clone (git clone --depth
1) and look for frequently occuring email addresses in git log.
Then I just send the bug/patch to them. It hasn't failed so far.




Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs)
Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 04:16:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.44953.B44953.163427133013188 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>, 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 44953-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B44953.163427133013188
          (code B ref 44953); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 04:16:01 +0000
Received: (at 44953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2021 04:15:30 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37654 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mbEd0-0003Qe-LL
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:15:30 -0400
Received: from mail-qt1-f181.google.com ([209.85.160.181]:43782)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>) id 1mbEcy-0003QO-ND
 for 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:15:28 -0400
Received: by mail-qt1-f181.google.com with SMTP id r17so7732284qtx.10
 for <44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
 :user-agent:mime-version;
 bh=JPzE/xmxAX6/4kJCAp9n/Ft44RaTg15KiSA+FEiUhXM=;
 b=Ct3zckmDfaAmZNhfg0keNfJK9PVphlkTogxly5Xj7jXDsdZLzIYClh+S7LvPlvIOQT
 QgVxqkr8GFf4r4kh+Ivo/1Z8UiP3ELpNiVjeuYuB52pS09BKJCiIk0bXbXcsFtStsRWh
 xqkJcE+XZhPPuVlkTuJ8cl9FlsbX8MhIANY+NyvhMM+5szNyXupM2zX/4QmC9GQqDd6l
 DxU4R9XY1lxRbBOJaCevBcJoBFuZJF4/B6KgHEeDiZ8J2ukVqWFoe4WoTrzDsISC80FC
 m37HVqgj+Q68MSRb38jRDLIHfxP/kbs6vvjmXcmK5maXyvrwhXlSV4OCK8sAnQx+2nLT
 FrzA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
 :message-id:user-agent:mime-version;
 bh=JPzE/xmxAX6/4kJCAp9n/Ft44RaTg15KiSA+FEiUhXM=;
 b=vb0DwWuVoRMSShS9lwmE58zv/hkRGL+pCbo7ZaPDVY+PVYNE/8Ri/BXAFrqQ1dZj3W
 JoknCUoqlg9ETTlbik+7qhmsJdR3SEjOR56T/dS15fFnOXvlTDa5T8TvNmZzTz60KPsJ
 UED9+H3Az6ABbeqjTjH9xFSdBYRTW2UsyGXOn/MRKQN94CyC2CVrmfPYpUAF2oghDXLa
 azO9FLNXNR2UfPxSuR0vrNkePkvlndZs1I3dj3UcvA4cix73l7nhRj1YlMCdGyN4ZTcT
 9Go0b4B0Y/9H8MPFmxOnXzBxg4YxEi6/kmhRITuJAsCvpWG3GTFQkuUGCLUzPUqa6xJo
 3Ndw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531LQoQ0Die249yOZkXEjKmXbkJ1c8SXEJ32rc6YfZcVcrbZcf9/
 gypADoQkWPCg60HeVEDn3X5tqGbLw6Vm9Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMIAmCDkgA5p8XMyu7oWg3205sV/x0NbC2RQmawZo+b0gQ4SzWkjGv0Cb8GpuhS5l6Nq5hBQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1992:: with SMTP id
 u18mr11305308qtc.111.1634271322816; 
 Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hurd (dsl-236-123-199.b2b2c.ca. [207.236.123.199])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u28sm1600447qtc.48.2021.10.14.21.15.21
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN> <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx>
 <87r1obd41k.fsf@HIDDEN> <20201205025736.50b83726@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:15:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20201205025736.50b83726@HIDDEN> (raingloom@HIDDEN's
 message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2020 02:57:36 +0100")
Message-ID: <87zgranctj.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hello,

For the record it seems Tobias had gotten around filing a bug here:
https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/issues/152.

It seems the issue is real and a new Linux-specific tool lsfd is being
devised.  I guess we should disable the test, as the package is still
probably mostly functional on Btrfs, and wait for a proper resolution
from upstream?

Mark, could you share your patch disabling the test if you still have it
handy?

Thanks,

Maxim




Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs)
Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 04:30:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.44953.B44953.163427218914496 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>, 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 44953-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B44953.163427218914496
          (code B ref 44953); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 04:30:02 +0000
Received: (at 44953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2021 04:29:49 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37665 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mbEqq-0003lk-U3
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:29:49 -0400
Received: from mail-qk1-f173.google.com ([209.85.222.173]:36448)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>) id 1mbEqo-0003lT-SI
 for 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:29:47 -0400
Received: by mail-qk1-f173.google.com with SMTP id p4so7530280qki.3
 for <44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
 :user-agent:mime-version;
 bh=LCY2BhPzGxnRfgMTDVcEP2DNVdkqJ0cz1IGq7odFCVg=;
 b=Yz4BkKKDURfgbRwUhcP4UhjgqVQ5ZqUGZ4hCpk/D01wUgafyWvzSZXnOQL0ivVgJ3i
 uFyy9dLwMQ2b8BBCH3c7E8OxJb8fafyv6IdLmdkQQD2/l9YtkheD/y3sa3aUZvhZoWLo
 FmKdW3O57QqzqSY363JmypfGxqQdJebTyQmmlxUyATCBZMSZTJMI7iIEutSyjuD7i+hD
 bCN/9y7kOCJaHqVZftoT0u++17hY+C/uskl6M6lH7C5/PrSrNmlOv78lpfGlJN81RpqZ
 K5HGS0YrCqwUDvrvnAaCbqpNMKNq1tR+h/fTZrixZDz9MKDgG+DICBwFHWIehuZOd6jr
 OVWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
 :message-id:user-agent:mime-version;
 bh=LCY2BhPzGxnRfgMTDVcEP2DNVdkqJ0cz1IGq7odFCVg=;
 b=cwiIefz38SNx/YyHsyTY8q9mWXWTGsVTDbfOwoWS0IPDvTWjLAN+KufPnG8pzYVUOY
 NmX1L+GJsdB/YLZ42EEmSM+z9E3qS82kQ6Yjap40soXswfftSrRB58kfF67E+X4e9eti
 zwDBVNnP9CHGH45bUuImXMtlQWXhL0+CefgfLXf1mEtZNjo5jQ1XlUsdp/1w1IH/tpTM
 iUQ+ppsiMorZXcIvUkIR4ljpWnpfWeFB0gltC+v/sfrZyQXHtHjzoPMtumBOKXnoBrtw
 4UgrPTmY2q6T5nCdsWIpby6r5J1uxjt6p6WKNIDxe9GI1nnmFlmKPOlsjcqBPtTI6ui1
 6ayg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531YWo3qo0ZGnEOLYywezRGS6ERkGeGzBbJFuhEGoBrGJU7Cq2go
 ZZ6usJ22aWc+WBdLdc7+XE3YP6abwiNevg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6wAIiBVAB9B+X4UEh42Se5MfKDmNQzvsLJ61hEG7E+twbQ60ESgnGvmbXnClmCHVerImSqg==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:ac2:: with SMTP id 185mr8160388qkk.446.1634272181128; 
 Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hurd (dsl-236-123-199.b2b2c.ca. [207.236.123.199])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v22sm2152651qkf.79.2021.10.14.21.29.40
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN> <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx>
 <87r1obd41k.fsf@HIDDEN> <20201205025736.50b83726@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:29:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20201205025736.50b83726@HIDDEN> (raingloom@HIDDEN's
 message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2020 02:57:36 +0100")
Message-ID: <87v91ync5t.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hello again,

Mark, I've figured it out and disabled it locally.  Will push shortly to
core-updates-frozen.

Thanks!

Maxim




Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs)
Resent-From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:14:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.44953.B44953.163428921311159 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>, raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>, 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 44953-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B44953.163428921311159
          (code B ref 44953); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:14:01 +0000
Received: (at 44953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2021 09:13:33 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38082 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mbJHQ-0002tv-Iq
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:13:32 -0400
Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:51484)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1mbJHM-0002te-2R
 for 44953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:13:31 -0400
Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mbJHF-0003Mj-8a; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:13:21 -0400
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87zgranctj.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@HIDDEN> <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx>
 <87r1obd41k.fsf@HIDDEN> <20201205025736.50b83726@HIDDEN>
 <87zgranctj.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:11:20 -0400
Message-ID: <871r4mbqjw.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Hi Maxim,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> writes:

> For the record it seems Tobias had gotten around filing a bug here:
> https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/issues/152.
>
> It seems the issue is real and a new Linux-specific tool lsfd is being
> devised.  I guess we should disable the test, as the package is still
> probably mostly functional on Btrfs, and wait for a proper resolution
> from upstream?
>
> Mark, could you share your patch disabling the test if you still have it
> handy?

Here's what I did on my private branch, which has diverged quite a bit
from master, so I don't know whether it will apply cleanly.


--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/x-patch
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename=0001-Revert-gnu-lsof-Make-test-failures-fatal.patch
Content-Description: [PATCH] Revert "gnu: lsof: Make test failures fatal."

From 1a658341538b8ea1470ef1bd02dfb3922011df79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:57 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "gnu: lsof: Make test failures fatal."

This reverts commit 2bf502138c9c8cad945866061772fe0e1f4b7175.
---
 gnu/local.mk                                  |  1 -
 gnu/packages/lsof.scm                         |  3 +-
 .../patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch    | 58 -------------------
 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 61 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch

diff --git a/gnu/local.mk b/gnu/local.mk
index eaa358266a..f53ceb35e9 100644
--- a/gnu/local.mk
+++ b/gnu/local.mk
@@ -1378,7 +1378,6 @@ dist_patch_DATA =						\
   %D%/packages/patches/lm-sensors-hwmon-attrs.patch		\
   %D%/packages/patches/lrcalc-includes.patch    		\
   %D%/packages/patches/lsh-fix-x11-forwarding.patch		\
-  %D%/packages/patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch		\
   %D%/packages/patches/lua-CVE-2014-5461.patch                      \
   %D%/packages/patches/lua-pkgconfig.patch                      \
   %D%/packages/patches/lua51-liblua-so.patch                    \
diff --git a/gnu/packages/lsof.scm b/gnu/packages/lsof.scm
index b317902ee7..3e527a272f 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lsof.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lsof.scm
@@ -41,8 +41,7 @@
             (commit version)))
       (file-name (git-file-name name version))
       (sha256
-       (base32 "0yxv2jg6rnzys49lyrz9yjb4knamah4xvlqj596y6ix3vm4k3chp"))
-      (patches (search-patches "lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch"))))
+       (base32 "0yxv2jg6rnzys49lyrz9yjb4knamah4xvlqj596y6ix3vm4k3chp"))))
    (build-system gnu-build-system)
    (native-inputs
     `(("groff" ,groff)                  ; for soelim
diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index e874ba6ad4..0000000000
--- a/gnu/packages/patches/lsof-fatal-test-failures.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 05:36:53 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] gnu: lsof: Make test failures fatal.
-
-Submitted upstream[0].
-
-[0]: https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/pull/144
-
-diff --git a/tests/Makefile b/tests/Makefile
-index 08574a0..2923bb8 100644
---- a/tests/Makefile
-+++ b/tests/Makefile
-@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ all:	${CKTSTDB} ${BASTST} ${STDTST} FRC
- 	  exit 1 ;\
- 	fi
- 	@rm -f config.LT*
--	-@err=0; \
-+	@err=0; \
- 	echo ""; \
- 	echo "Basic test:"; \
- 	./${BASTST}; \
-@@ -54,8 +54,11 @@ all:	${CKTSTDB} ${BASTST} ${STDTST} FRC
- 	    echo "Suggestion: try the optional tests: \"make opt\""; \
- 	    echo ""; \
- 	  fi; \
--	fi;
--	@rm -f config.LT*
-+	fi; \
-+	rm -f config.LT*; \
-+	if [ $$err -ne 0 ]; then \
-+	  exit 1; \
-+	fi
- 
- auto:	ckDB silent FRC
- 
-@@ -112,7 +115,7 @@ LTunix: LTunix.c ${CONFIG} ${LIBOBJ} ${HDR} config.ldflags
- 
- opt:	${CKTSTDB} ${OPTTST} FRC
- 	@rm -f config.LT*
--	-@err=0; \
-+	@err=0; \
- 	echo ""; \
- 	echo "Optional tests:"; \
- 	for i in ${OPTTST}; do \
-@@ -126,8 +129,11 @@ opt:	${CKTSTDB} ${OPTTST} FRC
- 	else \
- 	  echo "All optional tests succeeded."; \
- 	fi; \
--	echo "";
--	@rm -f config.LT*
-+	echo ""; \
-+	rm -f config.LT*; \
-+	if [ $$err -ne 0 ]; then \
-+	  exit 1; \
-+	fi
- 
- optional: opt
- 
-- 
2.31.1


--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


-- 
Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
but very few check the facts.  Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>.

--=-=-=--





Last modified: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:15:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.