GNU bug report logs - #45013
Using a different tags program

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>

Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:02:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 45013 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 45013 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#45013; Package automake. (Wed, 02 Dec 2020 18:02:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-automake <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 02 Dec 2020 18:02:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
To: bug-automake <bug-automake <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Using a different tags program
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:01:09 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
There doesn't seem to be a way for the user to configure a different ctags
program, unless I'm overlooking something? Passing "CTAGS=foo" to configure
has no effect; it seems that all one can do is pass "CTAGS=foo" to make
every time one runs "make tags".

-- 
https://rrt.sc3d.org
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#45013; Package automake. (Thu, 03 Dec 2020 22:18:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 45013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
To: rrt <at> sc3d.org
Cc: 45013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45013: Using a different tags program
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:17:34 -0700
Hi Reuben,

    There doesn't seem to be a way for the user to configure a different
    ctags program

I don't know of anything to the contrary. So ... would you be up for
making a patch to support it :)? Etags too, I guess? At least they seem
to be treated in the same way. --thanks, karl.




Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#45013; Package automake. (Thu, 03 Dec 2020 22:27:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 45013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
To: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
Cc: 45013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45013: Using a different tags program
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 22:26:06 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 22:17, Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org> wrote:

> Hi Reuben,
>
>     There doesn't seem to be a way for the user to configure a different
>     ctags program
>
> I don't know of anything to the contrary. So ... would you be up for
> making a patch to support it :)? Etags too, I guess? At least they seem
> to be treated in the same way. --thanks, karl.
>

Happy to look into it.

-- 
https://rrt.sc3d.org
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#45013; Package automake. (Fri, 04 Dec 2020 23:19:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 45013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
To: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
Cc: 45013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45013: Using a different tags program
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 23:18:04 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 22:26, Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org> wrote:

>
> Happy to look into it.
>

I have looked into it and attach a trivial patch, which works nicely.

It's not obvious to me whether any documentation is required; I rather
expected that these variables would behave like others (CC, CXX etc.). I've
actually struggled to find other variables which work similarly. CYGPATH_W
does, but it's not documented at all.

-- 
https://rrt.sc3d.org
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[0001-tags-add-support-for-CTAGS-ETAGS-and-CSCOPE-to-be-se.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#45013; Package automake. (Sun, 06 Dec 2020 02:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 45013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
To: rrt <at> sc3d.org
Cc: 45013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45013: Using a different tags program
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 19:14:22 -0700
    I have looked into it and attach a trivial patch, which works nicely.

Excellent, thanks much.

    It's not obvious to me whether any documentation is required; 

Yeah. The existing Tags node was rather inconsistent about mentioning
the various variables. I took the opportunity to tweak the text
there, and committed it all together (hope you don't mind).

BTW, it seems you reversed which file got which change (and it's tags.am
not tags.m4). I just changed the text around.

Thanks again (and closing),
Karl




Reply sent to Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sun, 06 Dec 2020 02:15:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sun, 06 Dec 2020 02:15:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 03 Jan 2021 12:24:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 113 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.