GNU logs - #45121, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45121: 27.1; gnu-elpa: "=?UTF-8?Q?Can=E2=80=99t?= find the autoload call!"
Resent-From: Simen =?UTF-8?Q?Heggest=C3=B8yl?= <simenheg@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 14:37:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45121.B.160743820110439 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 45121
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 45121 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.160743820110439
          (code B ref -1); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 14:37:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2020 14:36:41 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57061 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kme6b-0002iJ-1g
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 09:36:41 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45360)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <simenheg@HIDDEN>) id 1kme6V-0002i6-Gu
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 09:36:38 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58542)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <simenheg@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kme6U-0002g4-RB
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 09:36:35 -0500
Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:42860)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <simenheg@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kme6Q-00025G-HJ
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 09:36:34 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=runbox.com; 
 s=selector1;
 h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:
 Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From;
 bh=8iUZEAs9y/jU0RSIYz7HiMfT8XMm+RqR47NK4n89mCo=; b=nSOaubQwNdkX+Z8MPgdoVIep32
 mKj7iG/iJ316rkvknKtpBFuJ1Bu7snvBvT8j9Wsj2gk/UkKcrDs8v0Eil/ZdWjkZL95NgBviVEqKw
 cbYnuZVBKb4MpJqynJ74/Tg7QcAnJ3dyJv9EUXLXvFiNpgBzmzLh/48IL90LvQzlTfUuc9wxwZT/8
 1mwvcZl24HVXaWyaColYion1pMzJVZUMTSOxKOV+26BVBIyTGzb3u05fxVb48MFti81PbRrJJnncP
 jhQL4p2J7v7UJKK0EqveDuyA8CHy5dN1Tigvju1uPIlByzQfNmCotuwp7YDlmOaxkRLeY0CcPrPZW
 Mf1gzMzA==;
Received: from [10.9.9.74] (helo=submission03.runbox)
 by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <simenheg@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kme6K-0000iw-8j; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:36:24 +0100
Received: by submission03.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated alias (963757)]
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1)
 id 1kme6D-0005QC-OC; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:36:17 +0100
From: Simen =?UTF-8?Q?Heggest=C3=B8yl?= <simenheg@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:36:17 +0100
Message-ID: <877dpsqs9q.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=91.220.196.211; envelope-from=simenheg@HIDDEN;
 helo=aibo.runbox.com
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

After installing gnu-elpa from GNU ELPA, I tried running 'M-x sml-mode',
which resulted in the following error:

Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Can=E2=80=99t find the autoload call!=
")
  signal(error ("Can=E2=80=99t find the autoload call!"))
  error("Can't find the autoload call!")
  gnu-elpa--autoloaded-function()
  gnu-elpa--perform-autoload()
  byte-code("\300\301!\210\302 \207" [require gnu-elpa-utils gnu-elpa--perf=
orm-autoload] 2)
  autoload-do-load((autoload "gnu-elpa" "Major mode for editing Standard ML=
 code.\nThis mode..." t nil) sml-mode)
  command-execute(sml-mode record)
  execute-extended-command(nil "sml-mode" "sml-mo")
  funcall-interactively(execute-extended-command nil "sml-mode" "sml-mo")
  call-interactively(execute-extended-command nil nil)
  command-execute(execute-extended-command)

Not sure whether that's a bug or if I'm using the package wrong.

Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Simen =?UTF-8?Q?Heggest=C3=B8yl?= <simenheg@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#45121: Acknowledgement (27.1; gnu-elpa: "=?UTF-8?Q?Can=E2=80=99t?=
 find the autoload call!")
Message-ID: <handler.45121.B.160743820110439.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <877dpsqs9q.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 45121
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 45121 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 14:37:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 45121 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
45121: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D45121
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#45121: 27.1; gnu-elpa: "=?UTF-8?Q?Can=E2=80=99t?= find the autoload call!"
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:22:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.45121.B.16074408768899 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45121
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Simen =?UTF-8?Q?Heggest=C3=B8yl?= <simenheg@HIDDEN>
Cc: 45121 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16074408768899
          (code B ref -1); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:22:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2020 15:21:16 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59199 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1kmenj-0002JT-Lz
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:21:15 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:35736)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1kmeng-0002JJ-BP
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:21:14 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43712)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kmeng-0001J7-33
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:21:12 -0500
Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:6124)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>)
 id 1kmend-0001mL-Ge
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:21:11 -0500
Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AF70A81155;
 Tue,  8 Dec 2020 10:21:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1])
 by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 12DD080ACD;
 Tue,  8 Dec 2020 10:21:06 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca;
 s=mail; t=1607440866;
 bh=SO2dwTykEV7SKBO8FCWigX6bBdBsFXzK5H48+k2p1aY=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=n405i8TqUUR3EkiSGj0QRcPaZxuWlXHXY/GJJ4ElSBNY/LokCV0tb0Sx9VABqxbzR
 W2rNhUPjsmgU/C+g2McjZ5hLMYFTA5hlPn3PQzBIjJDeeMNJYtKJkpawlmVINLQ/Up
 x2ZWFJadzaMeMEZC31EGGsK+wUgymXK1R/8ro+JHwALk+Ot03eJFh7ZpgSTZ84TlFd
 BEFDwYGc/HIERqb3yl50HNSr8Szk/yjHowMpMfu7xP88+oi8It/Zc0RGMAs1fzHk+0
 cLCQ3V3f8L9GoZZpMO7YaA1n8p23F/vnkfRdvPS0kToBI9rksgDsYHvz/dYZq+H2fR
 F1AREDtQ1ibOQ==
Received: from alfajor (69-165-136-52.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.165.136.52])
 by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB97212026E;
 Tue,  8 Dec 2020 10:21:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <jwvv9dc49a4.fsf-monnier+emacs@HIDDEN>
References: <877dpsqs9q.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:20:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <877dpsqs9q.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Simen =?UTF-8?Q?Heggest=C3=B8yl?="'s message of
 "Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:36:17 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results:  0
 ALL_TRUSTED                -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 AWL -0.074 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
X-SPAM-LEVEL: 
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50;
 envelope-from=monnier@HIDDEN; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca
X-Spam_score_int: -42
X-Spam_score: -4.3
X-Spam_bar: ----
X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

> After installing gnu-elpa from GNU ELPA, I tried running 'M-x sml-mode',
> which resulted in the following error:
>
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Can=E2=80=99t find the autoload cal=
l!")
>   signal(error ("Can=E2=80=99t find the autoload call!"))
>   error("Can't find the autoload call!")
>   gnu-elpa--autoloaded-function()
>   gnu-elpa--perform-autoload()
>   byte-code("\300\301!\210\302 \207" [require gnu-elpa-utils gnu-elpa--pe=
rform-autoload] 2)
>   autoload-do-load((autoload "gnu-elpa" "Major mode for editing Standard =
ML
> code.\nThis mode..." t nil) sml-mode)
>   command-execute(sml-mode record)
>   execute-extended-command(nil "sml-mode" "sml-mo")
>   funcall-interactively(execute-extended-command nil "sml-mode" "sml-mo")
>   call-interactively(execute-extended-command nil nil)
>   command-execute(execute-extended-command)
>
> Not sure whether that's a bug or if I'm using the package wrong.

That'd be a bug.  And thanks for the recipe which I can reproduce here
fine.  Not sure yet what's the problem, but looking at the stacktrace it
looks like there's no visible funcall to `sml-mode` which is explains
why `gnu-elpa` can't figure out which function is to be autoloaded.


        Stefan
Last modified: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:30:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.