GNU bug report logs - #45238
The section [[info:guix#Invoking guix package]] contradicts itself

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: "Jorge P. de Morais Neto" <jorge+list <at> disroot.org>

Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:07:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 45238 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 45238 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#45238; Package guix. (Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:07:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to "Jorge P. de Morais Neto" <jorge+list <at> disroot.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:07:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Jorge P. de Morais Neto" <jorge+list <at> disroot.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: The section [[info:guix#Invoking guix package]] contradicts itself
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 14:06:30 -0300
Hi.  The last paragraph of [[info:guix#Invoking guix package]] says:

    However, note that package transformations are lost when upgrading;
    to preserve transformations across upgrades, you should define your
    own package variant in a Guile module and add it to
    ‘GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH’ (*note Defining Packages::).

This contradicts the earlier information, in the same section, about
`guix package -u':

    When upgrading, package transformations that were originally applied
    when creating the profile are automatically re-applied (*note Package
    Transformation Options::).

Regards

-- 
- <https://jorgemorais.gitlab.io/justice-for-rms/>
- If an email of mine arrives at your spam box, please notify me.
- Please adopt free/libre formats like PDF, ODF, Org, LaTeX, Opus, WebM and 7z.
- Free/libre software for Replicant, LineageOS and Android: https://f-droid.org
- [[https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html][What is free software?]]




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#45238; Package guix. (Thu, 10 Jun 2021 11:40:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 45238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: "Jorge P. de Morais Neto" <jorge+list <at> disroot.org>
Cc: 45238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45238: The section [[info:guix#Invoking guix package]]
 contradicts itself
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:33:53 +0200
Hi,

On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 14:06, "Jorge P. de Morais Neto" <jorge+list <at> disroot.org> wrote:
> Hi.  The last paragraph of [[info:guix#Invoking guix package]] says:
>
>     However, note that package transformations are lost when upgrading;
>     to preserve transformations across upgrades, you should define your
>     own package variant in a Guile module and add it to
>     ‘GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH’ (*note Defining Packages::).
>
> This contradicts the earlier information, in the same section, about
> `guix package -u':
>
>     When upgrading, package transformations that were originally applied
>     when creating the profile are automatically re-applied (*note Package
>     Transformation Options::).

I think it is fixed with the recent version of the manual.  Could you
confirm?

All the best,
simon




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#45238; Package guix. (Sat, 12 Jun 2021 11:01:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 45238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jorge P. de Morais Neto <jorge+list <at> disroot.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 45238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45238: The section [[info:guix#Invoking guix package]]
 contradicts itself
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 07:59:52 -0300
Hi,

Em [2021-06-10 qui 13:33:53+0200], zimoun escreveu:

> I think it is fixed with the recent version of the manual.  Could you
> confirm?

Yes, the problem I reported is fixed in the latest version of the
manual.

Thank you!

-- 
- https://stallmansupport.org "In Support of Richard Stallman"
- I am Brazilian.  I hope my English is correct and I welcome feedback.
- Free Software Supporter: https://www.fsf.org/free-software-supporter
- If an email of mine arrives at your spam box, please notify me.




bug closed, send any further explanations to 45238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and "Jorge P. de Morais Neto" <jorge+list <at> disroot.org> Request was from Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 12 Jun 2021 11:41:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#45238; Package guix. (Mon, 14 Jun 2021 06:53:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at 45238-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: "Jorge P. de Morais Neto" <jorge+list <at> disroot.org>
Cc: 45238-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45238: The section [[info:guix#Invoking guix package]]
 contradicts itself
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 08:41:40 +0200
Hi,

On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 07:59, Jorge P. de Morais Neto <jorge+list <at> disroot.org> wrote:

> Yes, the problem I reported is fixed in the latest version of the
> manual.

Thanks, so closing.

All the best,
simon




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 12 Jul 2021 11:24:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 287 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.