GNU bug report logs - #45439
Mistake in string

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: diffutils; Reported by: Daniel Tisi <daniel.tisi@HIDDEN>; dated Fri, 25 Dec 2020 22:15:02 UTC; Maintainer for diffutils is bug-diffutils@HIDDEN.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2020 22:14:35 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 25 17:14:35 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58370 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ksvM2-00040o-MZ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 17:14:34 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44070)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <daniel.tisi@HIDDEN>) id 1ksu1q-00087g-J6
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 15:49:38 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43246)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <daniel.tisi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ksu1q-0000T3-Ak
 for bug-diffutils@HIDDEN; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 15:49:38 -0500
Received: from mail-oln040092064065.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 ([40.92.64.65]:44679 helo=EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <daniel.tisi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ksu1o-0006VS-K0
 for bug-diffutils@HIDDEN; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 15:49:37 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none;
 b=c5F+sRAWMUVK7UCZw8JTt8nQv9R8d5sfILsySpDv8JevmBTeB0gDDZIT47bbQptxPKzxFXOJz+uSAau5HYmy6McWeJ3dMe/c0NNuIid3cPgCF4F0PnWdhLrodAAnna9tTII0g7OyU89CuO2jYzdqn0QOyUtwuumV/30d702qVfG2FaRJYZaeOMmtfg/xNL5eiLpTSmzRIr9vKSqlFtIavjdgg3OeNt57j/GOdgZIa0V7bdjufR0RR566+IR7CEEh6e4UVeqKuoO68UEaxvueV0898QgsyyAL3NfvI1DunDPw0sljXbSQ4vjh1be8qDb/ZWutNEF+uGo2xxjGTBqCAg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; 
 s=arcselector9901;
 h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
 bh=3wl+S3N3jlPD/t3aTxPl+e+Dupj6emZD/5cz9aOqHuU=;
 b=lwerGSLK37r7Fpb+8F4WygQMOdsRvcxViy0KJkl2+pJHP5pWou9u0iTh1xUQu4naSbUJwW6gbtUpBmVO+PjMxlV/5OFSJU8dLg4fzBi9H4WDdgOfnN1jh+OZSEH/4FbrXNdkAjGSRdVQr5JbKy5trQ09TSZCjm9IxSRUorOtCp2wWanj+2DX1JmL2ltps6wd0IUGsc6MLs/jOxU5lb1IP0qrlAwYaBDzn6Gv7LRlIjAn3E51qoBFej33nXbQsOOhcb8+Up69qHTVYMFhK7Ct5WDABeWcqdo9UMLFBC/uuBSsqdulmKhGYBzDGxXXnIoFHgqeF6jaOfZu/HjL0P24Cg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none;
 dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com;
 s=selector1;
 h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
 bh=3wl+S3N3jlPD/t3aTxPl+e+Dupj6emZD/5cz9aOqHuU=;
 b=JGDHwtdW95jz8eBNU3DeGOSZTx/BFJCe2ivXowAv3LD8xnDg/tLqYg+HjFizjRGzpoA/5P8UDKFElByeOhfzRXvPT0aH0qe/PVUDN4eSz8D50UFtQ08alinEBQZDA0A5FAA/ESpo4f7DisI1aTeNpaBA58HSNAjOPzs11J7dssDAHULPU+JSDKXE4uMaloCODm1RqFKk+wisdsE6ERs0zmhBol3h02E3s+NZ7+gYsiofukelxx5QG6U9ry9xlaxSwiGaWUFdf1KfnjbD16XMExUaTrVeuvlNjWG6GeBwc7W3AOpMnOAprGmRDu0DO7QSojewXueAQR0ESZe+AqHldQ==
Received: from VE1EUR01FT008.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com
 (2a01:111:e400:7e19::4a) by
 VE1EUR01HT149.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e19::487)
 with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3700.27; Fri, 25 Dec
 2020 20:34:32 +0000
Received: from AM0PR09MB4468.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com
 (2a01:111:e400:7e19::51) by VE1EUR01FT008.mail.protection.outlook.com
 (2a01:111:e400:7e19::67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3700.27 via Frontend
 Transport; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 20:34:32 +0000
Received: from AM0PR09MB4468.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com
 ([fe80::dc84:510a:9df7:1310]) by AM0PR09MB4468.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com
 ([fe80::dc84:510a:9df7:1310%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3700.026; Fri, 25 Dec 2020
 20:34:31 +0000
From: Daniel Tisi <daniel.tisi@HIDDEN>
To: "bug-diffutils@HIDDEN" <bug-diffutils@HIDDEN>
Subject: Mistake in string
Thread-Topic: Mistake in string
Thread-Index: AQHW2vpeDz1BSNWStU+KfeJvKZBxOg==
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 20:34:31 +0000
Message-ID: <AM0PR09MB44687A7C254F572581BBF8FCFEDC0@HIDDEN>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN, el-GR, es-ES
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:DCC8481A5053242114A71223405BC0EA1DDF445CFD2C53255DA8136B2B6AB2E1;
 UpperCasedChecksum:7D8ABAC5AE2022F5EB8CB940C7725324BC8D55CA09FE7A2379158EB7C72FE20E;
 SizeAsReceived:6599; Count:41
x-tmn: [NcAeDCtVxkBJjN+ve+nG78JlPj7wad8V]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 41
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e2774b1f-6f30-44d5-fe8c-08d8a9147bf3
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1EUR01HT149:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: YYxJwIvLTL2z+asWt1Gt8ep/kjhjp/MOUKiODjWlOEc3knpKQYPr9jdi0IPL+YhmKwH2hsdSFxTt7RLuLqt+r9CWkmdvuU568bP3/Ak7RbIfcM9n5a0XJO8eiWOw6rT0gxmtYkedcZj74xkQ9y09Eo/ra0ro0ZigFuMzYRon4w7RepAJZOzX0HA1QDWA818poBintEtOSkwFISCWVGJJAWlOTGgZAmCt6G89LXbrrjV7XIvYXx62QKw5zJpJEAXC
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: GyR9OeblELzTzgoeBmCwq7M5Q3XZ2aIYPvgb/q60v0yNUTd3TwjWTNca7CZ8dL1Ibi58H/1Oe+OK2xh+lTUUA11sp03a3PrR5ZjYanK93yX0eq0rzC4lbHSdrmdYRb0WsmfuE9EnDZVsv0OgIGzMhw==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="_000_AM0PR09MB44687A7C254F572581BBF8FCFEDC0AM0PR09MB4468eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: VE1EUR01FT008.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e2774b1f-6f30-44d5-fe8c-08d8a9147bf3
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Dec 2020 20:34:31.6515 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1EUR01HT149
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=40.92.64.65; envelope-from=daniel.tisi@HIDDEN;
 helo=EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
X-Spam_score_int: 43
X-Spam_score: 4.3
X-Spam_bar: ++++
X-Spam_report: (4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_50=0.8, DEAR_SOMETHING=1.973,
 DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Dear Sirs, I spotted a mistake in the ¡°diff¡± command¡¯s
   simplified Chinese interface. When comparing two identical files with the
   ¡°-s¡± flag, the command displays a string saying the files are actually identical.
    If the system language is simplified Chinese, the terminal language chan
   [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.2 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                             medium trust
                             [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  1.7 DEAR_SOMETHING         BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
                             provider (daniel.tisi[at]outlook.com)
  1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4      RBL: Very Good reputation (+4)
                             [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
  1.8 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL       No description available.
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 17:14:33 -0500
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)

--_000_AM0PR09MB44687A7C254F572581BBF8FCFEDC0AM0PR09MB4468eurp_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
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--_000_AM0PR09MB44687A7C254F572581BBF8FCFEDC0AM0PR09MB4468eurp_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dgb2312">
<style type=3D"text/css" style=3D"display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bo=
ttom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir=3D"ltr">
<div style=3D"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; c=
olor: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Dear Sirs,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I spotted a mistake in the =A1=B0diff=A1=B1 command=A1=AFs simplified =
Chinese interface.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>When comparing two identical files with the =A1=B0-s=A1=B1 flag, the c=
ommand displays a string saying the files are actually identical. If the sy=
stem language is simplified Chinese, the terminal language changes accordin=
gly. In this case, the string mentioned above
 starts with the character =A1=B0=99n=A1=B1 but it should be =A1=B0=B5=B5=
=A1=B1: =A1=B0=99n=A1=B1 is traditional Chinese, not simplified Chinese. Pl=
ease fix the bug.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
Daniel Tisi<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>

--_000_AM0PR09MB44687A7C254F572581BBF8FCFEDC0AM0PR09MB4468eurp_--




Acknowledgement sent to Daniel Tisi <daniel.tisi@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-diffutils@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-diffutils@HIDDEN:
bug#45439; Package diffutils. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 22:30:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.