GNU bug report logs - #45559
Cuirass has not successfully evaluated the stagig branch in 3 weeks

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 45559 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 45559 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Cuirass has not successfully evaluated the stagig branch in 3 weeks
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:34:10 -0500

The Cuirass instance at ci.guix.gnu.org has not successfully evaluated
the staging branch since December 6:

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/staging-staging

Is there anything we can do?

Does anyone have advice for continuing with Guix development?

Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: Cuirass has not successfully evaluated the stagig branch in 3
 weeks
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 17:14:18 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I was granted shell access to the Berlin server.

I have been building substitutes for the staging branch from the Git
tree at /home/lfam/staging

I noticed that Cuirass is doing *something* with the staging branch, but
it doesn't seem to have any result that I can observe from the interface
at ci.guix.gnu.org, and package substitutes do not appear.

------
$ ps aux | grep staging
[...]
cuirass   54325  0.0  0.1 509928 223724 ?       Sl    2020   0:21 /gnu/store/0w76khfspfy8qmcpjya41chj3bgfcy0k-guile-3.0.4/bin/guile --no-auto-compile -e main -s /gnu/store/q2qkcwd82p52x8kdar5kmmhrx464p0vk-cuirass-dev-0.0.1-57.697fa14/bin/evaluate ((#:name . "staging-staging") (#:load-path-inputs) (#:package-path-inputs) (#:proc-input . "staging") (#:proc-file . "build-aux/cuirass/gnu-system.scm") (#:proc . cuirass-jobs) (#:proc-args (systems "x86_64-linux" "i686-linux" "aarch64-linux" "armhf-linux")) (#:inputs ((#:name . "staging") (#:url . "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git") (#:load-path . ".") (#:branch . "staging") (#:tag . #f) (#:commit . #f) (#:no-compile? . #t))) (#:build-outputs)) (((#:input . "staging") (#:directory . "/gnu/store/13961d848pgzrbqw4bs4kniv4i4cch9z-guix-64e995b") (#:commit . "64e995b4cf473c7f52bad0dea8c27eea6eee662c") (#:timestamp . 1609327975) (#:load-path . ".") (#:no-compile? . #t)))
cuirass   62079  0.0  0.1 507644 233260 pts/8   Sl   Jan02   0:17 /gnu/store/5iisqr9wn9bgg9h52fw86why1xih1gvi-profile/bin/guile --no-auto-compile -e main -s /home/mathieu/cuirass/bin/evaluate ((#:name . "staging-staging") (#:load-path-inputs) (#:package-path-inputs) (#:proc-input . "staging") (#:proc-file . "build-aux/cuirass/gnu-system.scm") (#:proc . cuirass-jobs) (#:proc-args (systems "x86_64-linux" "i686-linux" "aarch64-linux")) (#:inputs ((#:name . "staging") (#:url . "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git") (#:load-path . ".") (#:branch . "staging") (#:tag . #f) (#:commit . #f) (#:no-compile? . #t))) (#:build-outputs) (#:priority . 3)) (((#:input . "staging") (#:directory . "/gnu/store/13961d848pgzrbqw4bs4kniv4i4cch9z-guix-64e995b") (#:commit . "64e995b4cf473c7f52bad0dea8c27eea6eee662c") (#:timestamp . 1609610295) (#:load-path . ".") (#:no-compile? . #t)))
------

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #11 received at 45559 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 45559 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45559: Cuirass has not successfully evaluated the stagig
 branch in 3 weeks
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 10:19:08 +0100

Hello,

I've restarted an evaluation of the staging branch, the matching process
on berlin has been running for 11 hours and is now stuck. That could be
caused by a circular dependency between modules.

Thanks,

Mathieu

Message #14 received at 45559 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 45559 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45559: Cuirass has not successfully evaluated the stagig
 branch in 3 weeks
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 09:08:21 -0500

On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 10:19:08AM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
> I've restarted an evaluation of the staging branch, the matching process
> on berlin has been running for 11 hours and is now stuck. That could be
> caused by a circular dependency between modules.

Is there any documentation on how to reproduce the problems caused by
this? Or any advice on debugging?

`guix pull` and `make` work okay.

Message #17 received at 45559 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 45559 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45559: Cuirass has not successfully evaluated the stagig
 branch in 3 weeks
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 15:35:25 +0100

Hey Leo,

> Is there any documentation on how to reproduce the problems caused by
> this? Or any advice on debugging?
>
> `guix pull` and `make` work okay.

I'm currently running:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(use-modules (gnu ci) (guix))
(hydra-jobs (open-connection) '())
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

which is replication the evaluation process.

Thanks,

Mathieu

Message #22 received at 45559-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 45559-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45559: Cuirass has not successfully evaluated the stagig
 branch in 3 weeks
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 22:59:23 -0500

On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 03:35:25PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
> I'm currently running:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (use-modules (gnu ci) (guix))
> (hydra-jobs (open-connection) '())
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> which is replication the evaluation process.

Thanks, this was helpful!

AFAICT, the evaluation failures were caused by a package collision while
building a profile from the zabbix system test.

Fixed in 48d8d92c51f64256bba2bdbb2a1027a5fab71a3d

Message #25 received at 45559 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
To: 45559 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: leo <at> famulari.name
Subject: Re: bug#45559: Cuirass has not successfully evaluated the stagig
 branch in 3 weeks
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 07:39:53 +0100

> AFAICT, the evaluation failures were caused by a package collision while
> building a profile from the zabbix system test.
>
> Fixed in 48d8d92c51f64256bba2bdbb2a1027a5fab71a3d

Nice catch, thanks!

Mathieu

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.