GNU bug report logs - #45575
gnu: Update ocaml-merlin

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu>

Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:55:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 45575 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 45575 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#45575; Package guix-patches. (Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:55:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Thu, 31 Dec 2020 19:55:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: gnu: Update ocaml-merlin
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 11:54:33 -0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Guix,

After working with ocaml a little, I felt the need to have a current
merlin.  I kept the 4.07 variants of packages but I don't understand why
they exist.

Thanks!

John


[0001-gnu-Add-ocaml-dot-merlin-reader.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[0002-gnu-Add-ocaml-version.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[0003-gnu-Add-ocaml-sexplib0.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[0004-gnu-Add-ocaml-mdx.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[0005-gnu-Add-ocaml-parsexp.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[0006-gnu-Add-ocaml-sexplib.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[0007-gnu-Add-ocaml-base.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[0008-gnu-Add-ocaml-odoc.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[0009-gnu-Add-ocaml-merlin.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#45575; Package guix-patches. (Thu, 31 Dec 2020 22:01:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 45575 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu>
To: 45575 <at> debbugs.gnu.org 
Subject: Add emacs-merlin
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 14:00:48 -0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I wanted to make autoloads and byte-compile the elisp provided by
merlin.  After fiddling with the emacs output of ocaml-merlin, I found
it much easier to just make an emacs package for merlin.  There is
further work to do to make a vim merlin package but I am not familiar
enough with vim to continue.

- John

[0001-gnu-Add-emacs-merlin.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#45575; Package guix-patches. (Thu, 31 Dec 2020 22:06:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 45575 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu>
To: 45575 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Add emacs-merlin
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 14:05:40 -0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Oops, I forgot to update the description of ocaml-merlin to reflect the
emacs package name.

[0001-gnu-Add-emacs-merlin.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#45575; Package guix-patches. (Thu, 31 Dec 2020 22:14:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 45575 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu>
To: 45575 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Add emacs-merlin
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 14:13:04 -0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Another oops, I forgot to put the base32 hash string on the same line as
base32.

[0001-gnu-Add-emacs-merlin.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#45575; Package guix-patches. (Thu, 31 Dec 2020 22:33:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 45575 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
To: John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu>
Cc: 45575 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#45575] gnu: Update ocaml-merlin
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 23:32:42 +0100
Le Thu, 31 Dec 2020 11:54:33 -0800,
John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu> a écrit :

> Hi Guix,
> 
> After working with ocaml a little, I felt the need to have a current
> merlin.  I kept the 4.07 variants of packages but I don't understand
> why they exist.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> John
> 
> 

Hi John,

thanks for the patches! I have pushed a series of patches from
Pukkamustard a few days ago that already add ocaml-merlin for the
latest OCaml compiler. Could you rebase your patches on master and
check if any of your patches is still relevant?

Thanks!




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#45575; Package guix-patches. (Thu, 31 Dec 2020 23:51:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 45575 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu>
To: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
Cc: 45575 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#45575: gnu: Update ocaml-merlin
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 15:50:45 -0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Julien,

Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> writes:

> thanks for the patches! I have pushed a series of patches from
> Pukkamustard a few days ago that already add ocaml-merlin for the
> latest OCaml compiler. Could you rebase your patches on master and
> check if any of your patches is still relevant?

Oops!  I have too many unmerged patches and rebasing is getting to be a
chore.  ocaml-merlin on master looks good to me.  The only thing I would
like to see is the emacs-merlin package.  Having emacs-merlin as a
package is nice because it takes advantage of the guix autoload
machinery.

Here's a rebased patch. I understand if it needs more thought.

Thanks a lot!

- John

[0001-gnu-Add-emacs-merlin.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Reply sent to John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sun, 24 Jan 2021 18:41:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sun, 24 Jan 2021 18:41:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #25 received at 45575-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu>
To: 45575-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Already done
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 10:40:15 -0800
Thanks for the patches!




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:24:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 56 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.