GNU bug report logs -
#45627
Disabling static libraries by default?
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 45627 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#45627
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 03 Jan 2021 15:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 03 Jan 2021 15:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Guix,
One-liners like this[0] one are about as fun to commit as they are
to see spam up your -commits@ mailbox, and make me wonder why we
don't pass ‘--disable-static’ (&c. for other build systems) by
default in the absence of a :static output. Has this been
discussed and rejected?
Guix plays so poorly with static linkage that I'm surprised we
keep these things lying around at all, like rakes to step on one
fun day.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[0]:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=c2c954afb2df5b9926f52b5c14d0213827e3401f
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#45627
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi!
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
skribis:
> One-liners like this[0] one are about as fun to commit as they are to
> see spam up your -commits@ mailbox, and make me wonder why we don't
> pass ‘--disable-static’ (&c. for other build systems) by default in
> the absence of a :static output. Has this been discussed and
> rejected?
I don’t think it’s been discussed but I think it’s a good idea!
Hand-written ‘configure’ script will fail when passed
‘--disable-static’, but hopefully those already have a custom phase
because of the other flags we pass by default.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#45627
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#45627
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:19:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 45627 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Hi!
>
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
> skribis:
>
>> One-liners like this[0] one are about as fun to commit as they are to
>> see spam up your -commits@ mailbox, and make me wonder why we don't
>> pass ‘--disable-static’ (&c. for other build systems) by default in
>> the absence of a :static output. Has this been discussed and
>> rejected?
Seconded, and +1 for humor.
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 53 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.