Received: (at 45836) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2021 11:28:48 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 13 06:28:48 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1kzeKV-0006CE-Vy
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:28:48 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45442)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1kzeKR-0006Bi-7e
for 45836 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:28:46 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54767)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
id 1kzeKK-00008I-Mj; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:28:36 -0500
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=37312 helo=ribbon)
by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
id 1kzeKK-00083k-BS; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:28:36 -0500
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#45836: cups-service-type duplicates lp group
References: <a8a72caf989dc39752a4025c6035d82f346fe116.camel@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:28:34 +0100
In-Reply-To: <a8a72caf989dc39752a4025c6035d82f346fe116.camel@HIDDEN>
(Leo Prikler's message of "Wed, 13 Jan 2021 02:09:23 +0100")
Message-ID: <874kjlcbz1.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 45836
Cc: 45836 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
Hi Leo,
Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@HIDDEN> skribis:
> it has come to my attention due to the recent reporting of #45830 and
> some conversation in IRC, that cups-service-type adds an lp group,
> which is already defined in %base-groups. Since both share the same
> definition, this is not too big an issue, but it prohibits us from
> using a hard error for #45770.
>
> I can currently think of two solutions: Either remove the lp group from
> cups-service-type or remove it from base-groups. Neither sounds
> particularly awesome. Perhaps we could also delete identical
> duplicates before asserting that there are none for #45770, but that
> sounds like a little much effort. Any ideas how else to solve this?
I=E2=80=99d be pragmatic here:
1. Ignore duplicates that are identical (don=E2=80=99t report them).
2. Remove =E2=80=9Clp=E2=80=9D from %base-groups since it has no use with=
out CUPS
(right?).
Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#45836; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2021 01:09:37 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 12 20:09:37 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33789 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kzUfI-0007gE-Vc for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:09:37 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:58030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1kzUfG-0007g6-Vw for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:09:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1kzUfG-0000mt-Gx for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:09:34 -0500 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:51935) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1kzUfD-0002dx-MN for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:09:33 -0500 Received: from nijino.local (217-149-169-137.nat.highway.telekom.at [217.149.169.137]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DFq903pNQz1LLyL for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 02:09:24 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4DFq903pNQz1LLyL DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1610500164; bh=6zpLu0yACTIbWD5lTrWyYuBXbDk4Ep03JvHJrH3I8wE=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:From; b=Q5Dg20k1l0QuPqyYV/y1ePCVCZKWXkoq9lNUVugsKTDVfJbDsHrUf6p9umlMfF548 QcAbXOA8tlvAMR9h3qzfPXXbGfHM6UeUXazS4uZ0Z+a4IH0A27C2fLRjUD7UoqxgqE b8cRnW09FTd+RUJ2FrLp8C2DfdXu85Wc6vJvZliU= Message-ID: <a8a72caf989dc39752a4025c6035d82f346fe116.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: cups-service-type duplicates lp group From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 02:09:23 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=129.27.2.202; envelope-from=leo.prikler@HIDDEN; helo=mailrelay.tugraz.at X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello Guix, it has come to my attention due to the recent reporting of #45830 and some conversation in IRC, that cups-service-type adds an lp group, which is already defined in %base-groups. Since both share the same definition, this is not too big an issue, but it prohibits us from using a hard error for #45770. I can currently think of two solutions: Either remove the lp group from cups-service-type or remove it from base-groups. Neither sounds particularly awesome. Perhaps we could also delete identical duplicates before asserting that there are none for #45770, but that sounds like a little much effort. Any ideas how else to solve this? Regards, Leo
Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#45836; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.